Neurath wrote: » I don't get how I see so many people saying people will exploit the corruption system...How would they exploit the corruption system? The only way I can see an exploit is if someone blocks access to a door, there is a fight and someone gets turned corrupted. I don't see any other way it can be exploited.
Neurath wrote: » Edit: Corrupted Players have a chance to kill Bounty Hunters, it would not be in a corrupted's interest to leave their gear behind, because if they left their gear behind they'd stand no chance at all.
Neurath wrote: » Causes the least conflict? You are aware you become corrupted through conflict right? There are sever death penalties a corrupted player receives. It would take forever to work off the experience debt if they regularly go corrupted. Its not like a quick-e-mart where they can kill whoever, die for freedom and have no repercussions.
phdmonster wrote: » It is important to note that YOU DO NOT DELEVEL. Essencially you get locked experience and that reduces your combat efficiency.
Nagash wrote: » Here we go again
noaani wrote: » I believe corrupt players are unable to trade with others. There is also the probability that corrupt players won't be able to unequip items. These two things should completely negate the above ways to "game" the system.
Namil wrote: » Nagash wrote: » Here we go again Thankyou for sharing your absolutely stout intellect and perspective with me for the sake of this DISCUSSION. I'm not shitting on the game, I'm being realistic about the players and if you really don't have anything to add then what is the point of you commenting?
Nagash wrote: » Namil wrote: » Nagash wrote: » Here we go again Thankyou for sharing your absolutely stout intellect and perspective with me for the sake of this DISCUSSION. I'm not shitting on the game, I'm being realistic about the players and if you really don't have anything to add then what is the point of you commenting? And I'm just sharing the mind-numbing pain that I have gotten from reading all of the corruption threads of the past three years. Right now we can only go on what the devs have said, and it's pointless for every tom, dick and harry saying that "their views are the best" when in fact nothing new is being said. If you want to make real change test the game in alpha or beta and then fix the problems so you can help the devs if not then shut up.
Nagash wrote: » And I'm just sharing the mind-numbing pain that I have gotten from reading all of the corruption threads of the past three years. Right now we can only go on what the devs have said, and it's pointless for every tom, dick and harry saying that "their views are the best" when in fact nothing new is being said. If you want to make real change test the game in alpha or beta and then fix the problems so you can help the devs if not then shut up.
Aardvark wrote: » Nagash wrote: » Namil wrote: » Nagash wrote: » Here we go again Thankyou for sharing your absolutely stout intellect and perspective with me for the sake of this DISCUSSION. I'm not shitting on the game, I'm being realistic about the players and if you really don't have anything to add then what is the point of you commenting? And I'm just sharing the mind-numbing pain that I have gotten from reading all of the corruption threads of the past three years. Right now we can only go on what the devs have said, and it's pointless for every tom, dick and harry saying that "their views are the best" when in fact nothing new is being said. If you want to make real change test the game in alpha or beta and then fix the problems so you can help the devs if not then shut up. The issue is the corruption system is one of the biggest things for many to decide if they want the game and to do the testing you say they have to buy an expensive package that includes that testing access. what is it like $350 for alpha 2 or something like that? Most people aren't going to plop down several hundred dollars without knowing if something as important as corruption is going to work in a way they find acceptable.
Nagash wrote: » Aardvark wrote: » Nagash wrote: » Namil wrote: » Nagash wrote: » Here we go again Thankyou for sharing your absolutely stout intellect and perspective with me for the sake of this DISCUSSION. I'm not shitting on the game, I'm being realistic about the players and if you really don't have anything to add then what is the point of you commenting? And I'm just sharing the mind-numbing pain that I have gotten from reading all of the corruption threads of the past three years. Right now we can only go on what the devs have said, and it's pointless for every tom, dick and harry saying that "their views are the best" when in fact nothing new is being said. If you want to make real change test the game in alpha or beta and then fix the problems so you can help the devs if not then shut up. The issue is the corruption system is one of the biggest things for many to decide if they want the game and to do the testing you say they have to buy an expensive package that includes that testing access. what is it like $350 for alpha 2 or something like that? Most people aren't going to plop down several hundred dollars without knowing if something as important as corruption is going to work in a way they find acceptable. And why is your acceptable view better than the devs or another player?
Aardvark wrote: » Nagash wrote: » Aardvark wrote: » Nagash wrote: » Namil wrote: » Nagash wrote: » Here we go again Thankyou for sharing your absolutely stout intellect and perspective with me for the sake of this DISCUSSION. I'm not shitting on the game, I'm being realistic about the players and if you really don't have anything to add then what is the point of you commenting? And I'm just sharing the mind-numbing pain that I have gotten from reading all of the corruption threads of the past three years. Right now we can only go on what the devs have said, and it's pointless for every tom, dick and harry saying that "their views are the best" when in fact nothing new is being said. If you want to make real change test the game in alpha or beta and then fix the problems so you can help the devs if not then shut up. The issue is the corruption system is one of the biggest things for many to decide if they want the game and to do the testing you say they have to buy an expensive package that includes that testing access. what is it like $350 for alpha 2 or something like that? Most people aren't going to plop down several hundred dollars without knowing if something as important as corruption is going to work in a way they find acceptable. And why is your acceptable view better than the devs or another player? All the corruption threads prove while we don't all agree on what it should be lots and lots of us consider it to be a critial issue and maybe even a deal breaker depending on how it does or does not turn out.