We need to provide some more feedback on multiboxing

There's still at least half of the front General Discussions page that isn't about multiboxing, so i feel we need to make some more threads and have 30 individual discussions about it to make sure we adequately cover the topic.

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Nagash

STOP!!!

Songcaller

We have trolls but where are the bridges?

Nagash

Neurath wrote: »

We have trolls but where are the bridges?

we burned them in the last forums

Whiskiz

To be real though multiboxing is never a good idea, you can try and control or balance it all you want (saying no script/macro, saying 1 account per PC etc) but it's hard to enforce and just an allround bad idea.

Seriously the only misstep i've seen them make so far and the only thing that's made me uneasy about their priorities.

Jakobe

A concern I have with multiboxing is the potential issue it brings to PvP players. It's common for rogue classes to venture out and PvP solo. Having a second account gives the convenience of setting up a "buff bot" that you could place in a safe zone and sustain an advantage over other solo non-multiboxing players. A great example is the solo PvPing/buff botting that would happen in DAoC. Open to hearing out solutions.

Nagash

Oh come on this was a joke thread!

Whiskiz

no u

Roymachine

Jakobe wrote: »

A concern I have with multiboxing is the potential issue it brings to PvP players. It's common for rogue classes to venture out and PvP solo. Having a second account gives the convenience of setting up a "buff bot" that you could place in a safe zone and sustain an advantage over other solo non-multiboxing players. A great example is the solo PvPing/buff botting that would happen in DAoC. Open to hearing out solutions.

I mean, how about the solutions DAoC Classic implemented? Range limit on buffs. Either that or go the WoW way with time limits.

Child Item