Warth wrote: » ????? They stated since the beginning that there won't be boobplates. Get off the Age of Conan wiki and join the Ashes of creation one. You'll be amazed
Warth wrote: » ????? They stated since the beginning that there won't be boobplates. Also there is no gender locked looks. Its the same armor, just adapted in a minor way Get off the Age of Conan wiki and join the Ashes of creation one. You'll be amazed
Ostaff wrote: » What? Rated for Teens? But TEENS don't even watch things rated for teens, only tweens do that.. Teens watch Adult content. So this game should be Adult rated
Riessene wrote: » Just to make it clear I am not against fun/risque/form fitting outfits. A dress with low neck? Hell yeah! Thigh high boots? Nice! But when lady guards are walking around clinking with their ridiculous looking plates it's the least appealing thing I can think of and I love women.
Riessene wrote: » I was also wondering what do you think about the second part of my post? About fancy suits or dresses also not being gender locked and adjusting to the character figure instead of turning into a completely different piece of clothing.
Noaani wrote: » To be fair, the male version of plate armor is just as ridiculous - none of it would actually be practical to wear in a fight. It isn't as ridiculous as armor in games like WoW, but it is still ridiculous and impractical.
Izzetin wrote: » Why is always someone saying ''boob armor is not practical'' thats such a stupid comment in a high fantasy game. For me? I dont care if SOME armor types are more revealing and other not, it doesnt disturb me and if someone wants to run around with less clothes, go for it. Its such a High Fantasy game you eat a f**** Meteor made of pure Fire and just loose some Hp. so what type of Armor is ''practical'' at this point ? its not a realistic game and nobody should give a duck about something like that. There shouldnt be Boobarmor ONLY but you dont have to hide the Womans Body either thats just wrong.