CROW3 wrote: » Super awkward way of asking ‘Can there be skimpy/sexy clothing for characters?’ Which is a totally valid question.
Vhaeyne wrote: » Look at what blizzard is doing. They self-censored a blurry painting that had been in the game for years. No one asked them to do that.
CROW3 wrote: » I don’t it a great example. Blizzard is in complete free-fall attempting to find their way after decades-long use of sexist working practices. These things you see manifesting in WoW is the tip of a very disturbing iceberg. Not sure that’s the case with IS.
tautau wrote: » Maybe "more skin = more sales" to MEN. It also might mean LESS sales to women. There are lots of women gamers, perhaps if this game was female friendly, we would find a larger player base? Also, the kind of guy who joins a game for skimpy outfits might be the kind of guy who leaves the game as soon as another game with skimpy outfits comes out. Rather than attract a guy who leaves in a few months, let's try attracting a woman who might stick around for years. Personally, I like playing games with woman players. We do know that AoC will not have Lolitas, that has been announced. So, if you want to look at scantily clad women, there are probably other places on the web where you can find that.
Vhaeyne wrote: » tautau wrote: » Maybe "more skin = more sales" to MEN. It also might mean LESS sales to women. There are lots of women gamers, perhaps if this game was female friendly, we would find a larger player base? Also, the kind of guy who joins a game for skimpy outfits might be the kind of guy who leaves the game as soon as another game with skimpy outfits comes out. Rather than attract a guy who leaves in a few months, let's try attracting a woman who might stick around for years. Personally, I like playing games with woman players. We do know that AoC will not have Lolitas, that has been announced. So, if you want to look at scantily clad women, there are probably other places on the web where you can find that. I have not seen that to be true at all. I have seen more women do slutmogs than men.
Noaani wrote: » Just because someone says they are a woman online, doesn't mean they are. Just sayin'.
JustVine wrote: » The market is saturated with games that have 'slut mogs'. If it fits the setting to have significantly less of them I am all for it. The problem is never the skimpy outfit. It is that cosmetics/design overfocus on them, never giving us a better spread of representation in taste. I like both. I just hate that me liking skimpy armor in one context apparently gives random men on the internet freedom to brow beat and silence the other side of demand. Some days I wanna feel cool other, days sexy. A good ally would support both.
Sathrago wrote: » tautau wrote: » Maybe "more skin = more sales" to MEN. It also might mean LESS sales to women. There are lots of women gamers, perhaps if this game was female friendly, we would find a larger player base? Also, the kind of guy who joins a game for skimpy outfits might be the kind of guy who leaves the game as soon as another game with skimpy outfits comes out. Rather than attract a guy who leaves in a few months, let's try attracting a woman who might stick around for years. Personally, I like playing games with woman players. We do know that AoC will not have Lolitas, that has been announced. So, if you want to look at scantily clad women, there are probably other places on the web where you can find that. Women like to look attractive. Men do as well. When a company provides a full variety of customization options for both sexes, from silly, to cool, to sexy, you get more people from both genders wanting to play. There's a reason why half my ff14 guild is a bunch of ladies running around in skimpy clothes and mods that increase butt/boob size. It's not just men that appreciate the view.