LaZzIsFree wrote: » but when i chill in verra on the beach, i would like to enjoy 1440p max settings even with 30 fps (without raytracing) im fine ;D
LaZzIsFree wrote: » @Zabr since the 3070 is recommended for 1440p and the pixel count is at least somewhat what we could go by .... 4k should be about 2,5 times as demanding ... since it is ~3,6mil pixel at 1440p vs ~8,3mil at 4k .... if we assume same settings .... to go then by userbenchmark .. i know can only do a general estimation with that data ... we could assume that a 4070ti super or 7900 XTX would be capable of delivering the same frames in 4k like the 3070 in 1440p if we assume 1to1 scalability... so pretty much "high end" amd or high performance nvidia if you have 800 to 900 dollars to spend on a gpu alone ... i guess you have a 7800 x3d to support it to not run into cpu bottlenecks -.- if the recommendation is "native ress" and not upscaled you can maybe get away with a 4070 super or 7900 XT and use FSR or DLSS to upscale 1440p to 4k without noticable picture quality maybe even with a 4070 or 7900 GRE with a little more aggresive upscaling
nanfoodle wrote: » I went down the 4k rout and in the end, same hardware 1080p at max ultra settings looks better.
Fantmx wrote: » I am not sure testing at 4K is a huge priority right now.
Zabr wrote: » I haven't been able to find any recommendations for playing at 4k. If anyone has any insight that would be greatly appreciated! Thank you so much!