grisu wrote: » Aside from self publishing, who do you suggest as alternative? @Atama It's garbage left or garbage right for EU. At the very least my.com went into a contract with IS. Just curious.
Atama wrote: » They had no good alternative. It was either use My.com or not be in the EU. It was the lesser evil. My point was that using My.com as a source for information not presented by IS themselves is not wise. I frankly don’t trust them, for obvious reasons. Essentially, saying “I got it from My.com so it must be true!” is worth a chuckle.
neomir wrote: » Atama wrote: » They had no good alternative. It was either use My.com or not be in the EU. It was the lesser evil. My point was that using My.com as a source for information not presented by IS themselves is not wise. I frankly don’t trust them, for obvious reasons. Essentially, saying “I got it from My.com so it must be true!” is worth a chuckle. I dont think Steven ever said it was my.com or not be in Europe, he said to self publish would cause delays.
Atama wrote: » neomir wrote: » Atama wrote: » They had no good alternative. It was either use My.com or not be in the EU. It was the lesser evil. My point was that using My.com as a source for information not presented by IS themselves is not wise. I frankly don’t trust them, for obvious reasons. Essentially, saying “I got it from My.com so it must be true!” is worth a chuckle. I dont think Steven ever said it was my.com or not be in Europe, he said to self publish would cause delays. True, I do vaguely remember now that they said if they self-published in the EU that they’d be releasing much farther out than the rest of the world (I believe online privacy regulations in the EU were at least partially to blame). So this was their way of letting EU players join with everyone else.
ralgurashes wrote: » If this game is forced pvp centric, it will fail. If it is not forced, then it has a shot, assuming they can ever get it live.
Nagash wrote: » Atama wrote: » mirg wrote: » Considering that this game is actively advertised on showcased on My.com I think you'll be seeing the game releasing in beta sometime in late 2019 or early 2020 then the final released product will prob be around summer of 2020. Yes, because when I think trustworthy organizations, I think My.com! I just hope intrepid keep to their word concerning my.com
Atama wrote: » mirg wrote: » Considering that this game is actively advertised on showcased on My.com I think you'll be seeing the game releasing in beta sometime in late 2019 or early 2020 then the final released product will prob be around summer of 2020. Yes, because when I think trustworthy organizations, I think My.com!
mirg wrote: » Considering that this game is actively advertised on showcased on My.com I think you'll be seeing the game releasing in beta sometime in late 2019 or early 2020 then the final released product will prob be around summer of 2020.
autumnleaf wrote: » ralgurashes wrote: » If this game is forced pvp centric, it will fail. If it is not forced, then it has a shot, assuming they can ever get it live. Not really ? it has been told that we will have open world pvp from the start and everyone here knows it.
DatFace wrote: » It will be like L2, players hitting will get marked - killing someone that didn't hit you back gets a PK (sort of) and scaling PvP / PK tabs. I dont see why this is wrong, imagine going to raid something (a dungeon for example) with your guild and you get crossed with another guild and have a fight together - winner gets to fight the boss and get the drops/achiev or whatsoever... I'm excited for that tbh and im not even a passioned-pvp-guy :P
glakuns wrote: » Just think how boring it would have been to kill 1 million boars.
atama wrote: » ralgurashes wrote: » If this game is forced pvp centric, it will fail. If it is not forced, then it has a shot, assuming they can ever get it live. What you do mean "forced pvp centric"? Do you mean that the game revolves around PvP primarily, and forces you to fight other players all the time? This game does not do that. There will be a lot of PvE content and there are systems to discourage (though not prevent) non-consensual PvP. If you mean the game is "forced pvp centric" because there is no way to become immune to PvP and there will be times when a player may attack you without your consent, and that you can't walk around feeling completely safe from other players... Then yes, that is true of this game. Which is nothing new, that was how the game was initially conceived in the first place.
ralgurashes wrote: » atama wrote: » ralgurashes wrote: » If this game is forced pvp centric, it will fail. If it is not forced, then it has a shot, assuming they can ever get it live. What you do mean "forced pvp centric"? Do you mean that the game revolves around PvP primarily, and forces you to fight other players all the time? This game does not do that. There will be a lot of PvE content and there are systems to discourage (though not prevent) non-consensual PvP. If you mean the game is "forced pvp centric" because there is no way to become immune to PvP and there will be times when a player may attack you without your consent, and that you can't walk around feeling completely safe from other players... Then yes, that is true of this game. Which is nothing new, that was how the game was initially conceived in the first place. Thank you for confirming. I won't be playing. Enjoy your game.
