Damokles wrote: » mcstackerson wrote: » Marzzo wrote: » Birdie wrote: » Because in most games, spears are two handed weapons. Spears can only be used while in formation to keep the enemy troops in a distance. Also strong against cavalry. However it's not useful in 1v1 combat. You can't win with a spear and a shield! (That's the realistic point of view of course) The spear is the single most effective 1v1 medieval weapon. Amateurs with Spears have been known to defeat masters with swords. What you are referring to, is a pike. but isn't that with two hands, not one? The pike is indeed the one, where you use two hands, while the spear requires one at the minimum. There are even pikes that are held by a multitude of people!
mcstackerson wrote: » Marzzo wrote: » Birdie wrote: » Because in most games, spears are two handed weapons. Spears can only be used while in formation to keep the enemy troops in a distance. Also strong against cavalry. However it's not useful in 1v1 combat. You can't win with a spear and a shield! (That's the realistic point of view of course) The spear is the single most effective 1v1 medieval weapon. Amateurs with Spears have been known to defeat masters with swords. What you are referring to, is a pike. but isn't that with two hands, not one?
Marzzo wrote: » Birdie wrote: » Because in most games, spears are two handed weapons. Spears can only be used while in formation to keep the enemy troops in a distance. Also strong against cavalry. However it's not useful in 1v1 combat. You can't win with a spear and a shield! (That's the realistic point of view of course) The spear is the single most effective 1v1 medieval weapon. Amateurs with Spears have been known to defeat masters with swords. What you are referring to, is a pike.
Birdie wrote: » Because in most games, spears are two handed weapons. Spears can only be used while in formation to keep the enemy troops in a distance. Also strong against cavalry. However it's not useful in 1v1 combat. You can't win with a spear and a shield! (That's the realistic point of view of course)
mcstackerson wrote: » Damokles wrote: » mcstackerson wrote: » Marzzo wrote: » Birdie wrote: » Because in most games, spears are two handed weapons. Spears can only be used while in formation to keep the enemy troops in a distance. Also strong against cavalry. However it's not useful in 1v1 combat. You can't win with a spear and a shield! (That's the realistic point of view of course) The spear is the single most effective 1v1 medieval weapon. Amateurs with Spears have been known to defeat masters with swords. What you are referring to, is a pike. but isn't that with two hands, not one? The pike is indeed the one, where you use two hands, while the spear requires one at the minimum. There are even pikes that are held by a multitude of people! My question was more at the spears 1v1 effectiveness. I know spears are effective with one hand in a formation but in a 1v1 fight, i'd think it's effectiveness would go down if you were still only controlling it with one hand.
nefelia wrote: » Everyone is focusing on Euro-centric use of spear and shield, but there are other notable examples of how well the combination works in combat. The Zulu kingdom is a good example. With lighter shields and light-weight spears they were very quick and agile in combat. Sadly, no amount of agility could overcome the might of the Gatling Gun.
Nagash wrote: » I just had a great idea double spear combo
Damokles wrote: » Nagash wrote: » I just had a great idea double spear combo What is better then one spear? TWO SPEARS, DOUBLE THE PENETRATION!
Varkun wrote: » Steven 😇Today at 10:52 PM One handed spears will be a thing in the future. Seems it will be so the sandle god has spoken today on discord.
caedwyn wrote: » as a full time mage dps (my entire gaming life ive been elven mage if possible XD) i always am upset about 2 things : 1: not all mages are not in need of walking stick please get rid of the need for staff! this is a stereotype! 2: i want to be able to have staff + shield
Nagash wrote: »
Atama wrote: » Nagash wrote: » Harry Dresden doesn’t count. That’s not staff and shield, that’s staff and bracelet!
Nagash wrote: » Atama wrote: » Nagash wrote: » Harry Dresden doesn’t count. That’s not staff and shield, that’s staff and bracelet! Its a magic shield ^^
Damokles wrote: » Seriously guys! The only class to use a "spear" (more like a lance) and shield in an MMORPG, at least as far as i know, is the lancer from Tera... It would be really cool, if tanks had the ability to specc into holding a spear in one hand and a shield in another, like a spartan hoplite. They could give the spear slower attackspeed or something in return, but i really like the idea of forcing the enemy to keep his distance.