SoggyBandaid wrote: » I definitely agree that Jahlon is no more important than anyone else, but I'm not sure if I agree that whatever collective banded together to support his case should be ignored as spam.
daveywavey wrote: » SoggyBandaid wrote: » I definitely agree that Jahlon is no more important than anyone else, but I'm not sure if I agree that whatever collective banded together to support his case should be ignored as spam. So, stick a 'Like' on the question and leave it at that. Don't flood the Q&A section with duplicates. I know Toast said "Please only post ONE question below", but they took it rather too literally...!
McMackMuck wrote: » I'm amazed by the anger from people who appear to not like a group of individuals thinking that Jahlon had a very good point that they would like to hear answered.
daveywavey wrote: » McMackMuck wrote: » I'm amazed by the anger from people who appear to not like a group of individuals thinking that Jahlon had a very good point that they would like to hear answered. We're not against the question. It was a reasonable enough question. We're simply against the strong-arm tactics of trying to force it above everybody else, and the spamming of what is already a very busy forum thread.