Sathrago wrote: » ThexBlackxKnight wrote: » Sathrago wrote: » Conrad wrote: » Just rename tank to Warden. Problem solved Wardens are basically glorified door guards for valuable places or things, not a good general term for tanks, but Tank is. :P If you are going to role-play in Ashes , Warden sounds much better then referring to someone as a Tank in a fantasy game. How does the word Tank even fit in a high fantasy world if actual tanks are not in the setting? Roleplay in most cases refers to taking on a role that is lore friendly, right? If they make lore that supports tank as a name will you be happy?
ThexBlackxKnight wrote: » Sathrago wrote: » Conrad wrote: » Just rename tank to Warden. Problem solved Wardens are basically glorified door guards for valuable places or things, not a good general term for tanks, but Tank is. :P If you are going to role-play in Ashes , Warden sounds much better then referring to someone as a Tank in a fantasy game. How does the word Tank even fit in a high fantasy world if actual tanks are not in the setting?
Sathrago wrote: » Conrad wrote: » Just rename tank to Warden. Problem solved Wardens are basically glorified door guards for valuable places or things, not a good general term for tanks, but Tank is. :P
Conrad wrote: » Just rename tank to Warden. Problem solved
Sathrago wrote: » Woah woah woah it was a simple question what's with all the angry crap yall are spewing? We are literally arguing about a name in a fantasy game, you cant say it wont make sense until you see the lore of the game, which no one has yet. Just because you personally do not like the name does not mean the writers of a novel need to change it, so why do you suddenly get that privilege now that it's a video game?
Sholer wrote: » Sathrago wrote: » Woah woah woah it was a simple question what's with all the angry crap yall are spewing? We are literally arguing about a name in a fantasy game, you cant say it wont make sense until you see the lore of the game, which no one has yet. Just because you personally do not like the name does not mean the writers of a novel need to change it, so why do you suddenly get that privilege now that it's a video game? Because your ansewers sounds conceited af "Just because you personally do not like the name does not mean the writers of a novel need to change it, so why do you suddenly get that privilege now?" We are in the forums to suggest what things can go better for the game, we are not here saying we have all the answers, nobody here is treating bad to the writers.
Sathrago wrote: » Sholer wrote: » Sathrago wrote: » Woah woah woah it was a simple question what's with all the angry crap yall are spewing? We are literally arguing about a name in a fantasy game, you cant say it wont make sense until you see the lore of the game, which no one has yet. Just because you personally do not like the name does not mean the writers of a novel need to change it, so why do you suddenly get that privilege now that it's a video game? Because your ansewers sounds conceited af "Just because you personally do not like the name does not mean the writers of a novel need to change it, so why do you suddenly get that privilege now?" We are in the forums to suggest what things can go better for the game, we are not here saying we have all the answers, nobody here is treating bad to the writers. Then block me if you find my words so "conceited". Don't respond to questions and the other side of the argument, let's see how long you enjoy shouting into the void. All I did was give my take, and what seems to be the take of a few others in this thread. Perhaps you should have read it first before posting?
Sholer wrote: » Sathrago wrote: » Sholer wrote: » Sathrago wrote: » Woah woah woah it was a simple question what's with all the angry crap yall are spewing? We are literally arguing about a name in a fantasy game, you cant say it wont make sense until you see the lore of the game, which no one has yet. Just because you personally do not like the name does not mean the writers of a novel need to change it, so why do you suddenly get that privilege now that it's a video game? Because your ansewers sounds conceited af "Just because you personally do not like the name does not mean the writers of a novel need to change it, so why do you suddenly get that privilege now?" We are in the forums to suggest what things can go better for the game, we are not here saying we have all the answers, nobody here is treating bad to the writers. Then block me if you find my words so "conceited". Don't respond to questions and the other side of the argument, let's see how long you enjoy shouting into the void. All I did was give my take, and what seems to be the take of a few others in this thread. Perhaps you should have read it first before posting? nobody needs to block you sweetie, we all here brings answer to you too but with no necessary need to be conceited, you're the only one here who looks a little nervous and mark the others like angry.
Sathrago wrote: » Sholer wrote: » Sathrago wrote: » Sholer wrote: » Sathrago wrote: » Woah woah woah it was a simple question what's with all the angry crap yall are spewing? We are literally arguing about a name in a fantasy game, you cant say it wont make sense until you see the lore of the game, which no one has yet. Just because you personally do not like the name does not mean the writers of a novel need to change it, so why do you suddenly get that privilege now that it's a video game? Because your ansewers sounds conceited af "Just because you personally do not like the name does not mean the writers of a novel need to change it, so why do you suddenly get that privilege now?" We are in the forums to suggest what things can go better for the game, we are not here saying we have all the answers, nobody here is treating bad to the writers. Then block me if you find my words so "conceited". Don't respond to questions and the other side of the argument, let's see how long you enjoy shouting into the void. All I did was give my take, and what seems to be the take of a few others in this thread. Perhaps you should have read it first before posting? nobody needs to block you sweetie, we all here brings answer to you too but with no necessary need to be conceited, you're the only one here who looks a little nervous and mark the others like angry. Just wasting time here bud. Tank is fine as is, you have not given a good reason to change it.
Sholer wrote: » Sathrago wrote: » Sholer wrote: » Sathrago wrote: » Sholer wrote: » Sathrago wrote: » Woah woah woah it was a simple question what's with all the angry crap yall are spewing? We are literally arguing about a name in a fantasy game, you cant say it wont make sense until you see the lore of the game, which no one has yet. Just because you personally do not like the name does not mean the writers of a novel need to change it, so why do you suddenly get that privilege now that it's a video game? Because your ansewers sounds conceited af "Just because you personally do not like the name does not mean the writers of a novel need to change it, so why do you suddenly get that privilege now?" We are in the forums to suggest what things can go better for the game, we are not here saying we have all the answers, nobody here is treating bad to the writers. Then block me if you find my words so "conceited". Don't respond to questions and the other side of the argument, let's see how long you enjoy shouting into the void. All I did was give my take, and what seems to be the take of a few others in this thread. Perhaps you should have read it first before posting? nobody needs to block you sweetie, we all here brings answer to you too but with no necessary need to be conceited, you're the only one here who looks a little nervous and mark the others like angry. Just wasting time here bud. Tank is fine as is, you have not given a good reason to change it. Yes I did, tank doesn't sounds good in a roleplay term.
Sathrago wrote: » Sholer wrote: » Sathrago wrote: » Sholer wrote: » Sathrago wrote: » Sholer wrote: » Sathrago wrote: » Woah woah woah it was a simple question what's with all the angry crap yall are spewing? We are literally arguing about a name in a fantasy game, you cant say it wont make sense until you see the lore of the game, which no one has yet. Just because you personally do not like the name does not mean the writers of a novel need to change it, so why do you suddenly get that privilege now that it's a video game? Because your ansewers sounds conceited af "Just because you personally do not like the name does not mean the writers of a novel need to change it, so why do you suddenly get that privilege now?" We are in the forums to suggest what things can go better for the game, we are not here saying we have all the answers, nobody here is treating bad to the writers. Then block me if you find my words so "conceited". Don't respond to questions and the other side of the argument, let's see how long you enjoy shouting into the void. All I did was give my take, and what seems to be the take of a few others in this thread. Perhaps you should have read it first before posting? nobody needs to block you sweetie, we all here brings answer to you too but with no necessary need to be conceited, you're the only one here who looks a little nervous and mark the others like angry. Just wasting time here bud. Tank is fine as is, you have not given a good reason to change it. Yes I did, tank doesn't sounds good in a roleplay term. And I asked if you would be ok with it if they actually had lore to explain why things were tanks. Oh look a perfectly reasonable line of discussion that you destroyed by insulting me. So I assume your answer is no meaning you actually dont give a damn about the lore.
Sholer wrote: » And I already told you that it doesn't going to sound good even if they going to try to make the name tank sounded good in the term of rolplay. And I didn't insult you. lol
Dygz wrote: » I consider a Tank to be someone in heavy plate that does some powerful damage in battle. I don't need the vehicle reference for the concept to work. We're going to be on Verra. That's the word that is used for the concept on that world, so...it's fine.
GodsThesis wrote: » Jokes aside... It's possible that we may be caught up too much by equating archetypes to classes, though they are heavily related to one another. We do need to remember that the Archetypes are general patterns of behavior/personality for a given identity or in this case with a game: the prototype of the roles and their intended function. The class itself (choosing the 2 archetypes) is the final product and manifestation of the combined types. But yeah the tank thing has kinda grown on me too when I realized this. Not the coolest name but it gets the job done. Most likely what will really matter is the final product after choosing the two archetypes. But this, I admit, is just me speculating. Because I highly doubt that ingame, the NPCs will be like, "Great holy tank Godsthesis, go there and pick 2 pounds of wet grass." It's like pokemon mystery dungeon series when you pick your pokemon in the beginning, you answer a set of questions to determine your personality and then poof, the end result is a pokemon based on your choices.
