Dygz wrote: » Dolyem wrote: » What if your account counts as a single entity in a guild as opposed to counting the alts as additional members?? That would be dumb for an MMORPG.
Dolyem wrote: » What if your account counts as a single entity in a guild as opposed to counting the alts as additional members??
Dygz wrote: » Because RPGs are about each character having the freedom to do what they want rather than just being one representation of the player.
Dygz wrote: » No. RPGs are not about each player. RPGs are about each player character.
Dolyem wrote: » Dygz wrote: » No. RPGs are not about each player. RPGs are about each player character. I mean that is debatable, seeing as the main focus is to engage and entertain the player, not the character they play.
CROW3 wrote: » 3 pages and I still haven't seen a single reason why this would benefit the player over the current system. You're proposing to take a choice away from the player that's existed as precedent in mmos for almost 20 years - for what?
Dygz wrote: » Because they want the focus of the game to be on the players, rather than on the player characters.
Dolyem wrote: » I actually agree with this. It can also prevent 3rd party subversion as far as making an alt to spy on enemy guilds. You'd have to open another account in this instance if you wish to pursue that option as opposed to easily hopping on an alt and joining a guild you wish to peep on.
Noaani wrote: » A number of MMORPG's already do exactly this.
Dygz wrote: » Casual - I think you do not understand the meaning of ths word.
Marcet wrote: » From a roleplaying perspective it kills my immersion to have an account bound guild. I hate being lvl 0 and already in a guild chat, people talking to me like im my lvl60 char. I want to be completely anonymous, every char his own story, and I don't want to see account names on people either. If we keep changing every abusable thing in the game we'll end up with no game at all, go play solitaire maybe you can't abuse systems there.
NiKr wrote: » Dygz wrote: » Casual - I think you do not understand the meaning of ths word. Ok, not casual. Lazy. Or whatever the best-fitting word is for a person who wants all the benefits for none the work. Lately that's been "casual". Yes, not all casuals are the same, but from everything I've seen on forums/reddit - "casual" is usually used for people who want all the rewards with the smallest amount of investment into the work required for the reward. And the suggestion of "all of my characters on one account benefit from being in the same guild w/o me spending x (the amount of characters on an account) times the time required to earn those benefits in those guilds". That is the most fucking "I want it all and I want it now and w/o any commitment" bullshit I've heard in the last few years.
Mag7spy wrote: » [All alts and characters are you they are not separate. You put the work in to earn your place every day, week, etc.
NiKr wrote: » Mag7spy wrote: » [All alts and characters are you they are not separate. You put the work in to earn your place every day, week, etc. No you do not when it's fucking 6+ characters for just one place in the guild. You are not putting 6+ times the investment into the guild, yet you're getting 6+ times the benefit. That is not how that works when your alts can be in other guilds, because you'd have to work 6+ times as hard if you had 6+ alts in 6+ different guilds. BECAUSE EACH GUILD CAN KICK YOU IF YOU DON'T DO ENOUGH FOR THEM.