PenguinPaladin wrote: » Asgerr wrote: » PenguinPaladin wrote: » akabear wrote: » I always thought Alpha 2 was planned to be short, and if that is and still is the case, then it will/should be quite polished Alpha 2 is planned to be persistent, until release. It is an alpha. The game will not be completed yet when alpha 2 starts. Beta's are planned to be short. And even after release, it'll be their public test server (which I'm still on the fence about liking or disliking its existence). I mean... with complex systems, a test environment of an adequate scale is needed, to make sure patches truly are ready to be pushed.... as long as the "test servers" are reset on launch, and still possibly at risk of further resets, i dont mind them existing.
Asgerr wrote: » PenguinPaladin wrote: » akabear wrote: » I always thought Alpha 2 was planned to be short, and if that is and still is the case, then it will/should be quite polished Alpha 2 is planned to be persistent, until release. It is an alpha. The game will not be completed yet when alpha 2 starts. Beta's are planned to be short. And even after release, it'll be their public test server (which I'm still on the fence about liking or disliking its existence).
PenguinPaladin wrote: » akabear wrote: » I always thought Alpha 2 was planned to be short, and if that is and still is the case, then it will/should be quite polished Alpha 2 is planned to be persistent, until release. It is an alpha. The game will not be completed yet when alpha 2 starts. Beta's are planned to be short.
akabear wrote: » I always thought Alpha 2 was planned to be short, and if that is and still is the case, then it will/should be quite polished
Asgerr wrote: » PenguinPaladin wrote: » Asgerr wrote: » PenguinPaladin wrote: » akabear wrote: » I always thought Alpha 2 was planned to be short, and if that is and still is the case, then it will/should be quite polished Alpha 2 is planned to be persistent, until release. It is an alpha. The game will not be completed yet when alpha 2 starts. Beta's are planned to be short. And even after release, it'll be their public test server (which I'm still on the fence about liking or disliking its existence). I mean... with complex systems, a test environment of an adequate scale is needed, to make sure patches truly are ready to be pushed.... as long as the "test servers" are reset on launch, and still possibly at risk of further resets, i dont mind them existing. I had a full thread discussion about this, but people chose to bury it by commenting on the umpteenth Cosmetic thread, or reviving Tank is a bad threads etc. I personally don't think it is needed. Just have Intrepid test it internally or by hiring QAs. Opening it up to everyone will ultimately lead to similar situations as with WoW, where things are over-attuned for and by the 1% of players who actually test things to min-max their raid runs/node development choices etc. Though with the lack of story in AoC, there will at least not be a massive issue with spoilers.
beapo wrote: » What is the benifit of making something like that? It seems pointless to me...
Asgerr wrote: » And even after release, it'll be their public test server (which I'm still on the fence about liking or disliking its existence).
Scarbeus wrote: » Asgerr wrote: » And even after release, it'll be their public test server (which I'm still on the fence about liking or disliking its existence). Not sure why you would be against a public test server. It helps them prevent patches come out that turn out to be broken.
Asgerr wrote: » I personally don't think it is needed. Just have Intrepid test it internally or by hiring QAs. Opening it up to everyone will ultimately lead to similar situations as with WoW, where things are over-attuned for and by the 1% of players who actually test things to min-max their raid runs/node development choices etc. Though with the lack of story in AoC, there will at least not be a massive issue with spoilers.
akabear wrote: » akabear wrote: » 30 poll replies so far, and 50% think 2024Q4 or later.. 60 votes and almost the same result..
akabear wrote: » 30 poll replies so far, and 50% think 2024Q4 or later..