worddog wrote: » akabear wrote: » Exploiters pretty much decimated NW. Do not want to see again! Happy to see those that exploit penalized up to banned! Set the ground rules and expectations up front, and just perhaps there will be less that take advantage Do you not realize banning the exploiters didn't fix anything right? The moment those duplication exploits were found, that server's economy died. They never recovered. You need exploiters to figure out all the problems that the developers overlook, and you need them to do it before launch.
akabear wrote: » Exploiters pretty much decimated NW. Do not want to see again! Happy to see those that exploit penalized up to banned! Set the ground rules and expectations up front, and just perhaps there will be less that take advantage
worddog wrote: » Noaani wrote: » worddog wrote: » Remember kids, exploits are totally fine and developers shouldn't fix them. Where has anyone other than you said this? Dolyem wrote: » Remember kids, the existing exploit itself isn't what ruins the game. Its the people actually taking advantage of the exploit that ruin it. If exploits don't ruin the game, developers should not waste their precious time fixing them, when they could just ban the people who exploit them. The only reason you would fix exploits, is if they themselves were bad.
Noaani wrote: » worddog wrote: » Remember kids, exploits are totally fine and developers shouldn't fix them. Where has anyone other than you said this?
worddog wrote: » Remember kids, exploits are totally fine and developers shouldn't fix them.
Dolyem wrote: » Remember kids, the existing exploit itself isn't what ruins the game. Its the people actually taking advantage of the exploit that ruin it.
worddog wrote: » insomnia wrote: » superhero6785 wrote: » worddog wrote: » insomnia wrote: » I'm starting to wonder if OP is just trolling, considering another topic he made Did I make a post saying to ban exploiters? Why would I be trolling He's saying you made a post about a potential Corruption Exploit, followed by a post saying "Don't ban exploiters". yeah, i ment topic not post. worddog wrote: » superhero6785 wrote: » worddog wrote: » insomnia wrote: » I'm starting to wonder if OP is just trolling, considering another topic he made Did I make a post saying to ban exploiters? Why would I be trolling He's saying you made a post about a potential Corruption Exploit, followed by a post saying "Don't ban exploiters". I don't see the relation. I understand they both have the word exploit, but one is about how banning people doesn't go back in time and stop the damage, and the other is more so just trying to get people to talk about the corruption system. same mentality Can I ask what you think the point of this current post is? "Dont Ban People Who Exploit" what do you think the reason I'm making this post is.
insomnia wrote: » superhero6785 wrote: » worddog wrote: » insomnia wrote: » I'm starting to wonder if OP is just trolling, considering another topic he made Did I make a post saying to ban exploiters? Why would I be trolling He's saying you made a post about a potential Corruption Exploit, followed by a post saying "Don't ban exploiters". yeah, i ment topic not post. worddog wrote: » superhero6785 wrote: » worddog wrote: » insomnia wrote: » I'm starting to wonder if OP is just trolling, considering another topic he made Did I make a post saying to ban exploiters? Why would I be trolling He's saying you made a post about a potential Corruption Exploit, followed by a post saying "Don't ban exploiters". I don't see the relation. I understand they both have the word exploit, but one is about how banning people doesn't go back in time and stop the damage, and the other is more so just trying to get people to talk about the corruption system. same mentality
superhero6785 wrote: » worddog wrote: » insomnia wrote: » I'm starting to wonder if OP is just trolling, considering another topic he made Did I make a post saying to ban exploiters? Why would I be trolling He's saying you made a post about a potential Corruption Exploit, followed by a post saying "Don't ban exploiters".
worddog wrote: » insomnia wrote: » I'm starting to wonder if OP is just trolling, considering another topic he made Did I make a post saying to ban exploiters? Why would I be trolling
insomnia wrote: » I'm starting to wonder if OP is just trolling, considering another topic he made
worddog wrote: » superhero6785 wrote: » worddog wrote: » insomnia wrote: » I'm starting to wonder if OP is just trolling, considering another topic he made Did I make a post saying to ban exploiters? Why would I be trolling He's saying you made a post about a potential Corruption Exploit, followed by a post saying "Don't ban exploiters". I don't see the relation. I understand they both have the word exploit, but one is about how banning people doesn't go back in time and stop the damage, and the other is more so just trying to get people to talk about the corruption system.
worddog wrote: » Dolyem wrote: » So far your entire argument seems to be allowing players to abuse found exploits which is baffling. You can find exploits to have fixed without actually abusing them and disrupting the games intended design. By your logic it is entirely ok to allow a player to dupe millions of gold if they found a means to do so, and let them do so unpunished. So far your entire argument seems to be that exploiters are fine as long as they are hated and eventually banned after disrupting the game for people who do not engage with exploits. I'm actually more anti-exploiter than you are because I want them not to exist in games I play. You want them to exist you just want them to get banned after they've already destroyed the game. The only reason I can imagine you'd be defending exploits is because you prefer argumentation over communication when it comes to forum discussion. Which is perfectly fine and common, I respect your engagement in any form that it takes.
Dolyem wrote: » So far your entire argument seems to be allowing players to abuse found exploits which is baffling. You can find exploits to have fixed without actually abusing them and disrupting the games intended design. By your logic it is entirely ok to allow a player to dupe millions of gold if they found a means to do so, and let them do so unpunished.
Wandering Mist wrote: » Hi everyone. I'd like to remind you all that just because someone disagrees with your point of view, or you don't understand their point of view doesn't mean they are trolling. Please can we stop accusing each other of trolling and stick to debating the arguments brought up. Attack the argument, NOT the user. Thanks
insomnia wrote: » Wandering Mist wrote: » Hi everyone. I'd like to remind you all that just because someone disagrees with your point of view, or you don't understand their point of view doesn't mean they are trolling. Please can we stop accusing each other of trolling and stick to debating the arguments brought up. Attack the argument, NOT the user. Thanks But OP keeps ignoring ½ the arguments used against him. Then twists what people say.
Wandering Mist wrote: » Attack the argument, NOT the user. Thanks
