NiKr wrote: » Nerror wrote: » some combination I think it's this, cause I looked at some lower-starred people and the range on post/like values was quite vast. Potentially there could be some "date created" weights as well, cause that'd be the most logical thing when trying to fight off spam from literally newborn accs.
Nerror wrote: » some combination
Enigmatic Sage wrote: » Vaknar wrote: » @Depraved is correct. In its current form, this is just something in place to combat spam. guess i would have to not ignore their posts to know that then I got several monkeys ignored the forums are better off this way!
Vaknar wrote: » @Depraved is correct. In its current form, this is just something in place to combat spam.
Vaknar wrote: » These Ranks shouldn't impact or affect your ability to communicate if you've already been communicating on the forums.
Vaknar wrote: » Let's be well unto one another. I'd hate to give warnings for something so silly
Enigmatic Sage wrote: » If you cant visually see the flaw in this then I dont know what to tell you
Voeltz wrote: » Seems to be a spam and semantics rating for those who like to carry on needlessly for 20 pages
Enigmatic Sage wrote: » @Vaknar If you cant visually see the flaw in this then I dont know what to tell you