PvE Players tell me why you follow Ashes of Creation

Doesn't matter if the first time you saw Ashes was in kickstarter, or just learned of the project 2 weeks ago.

As a PvE first player, what makes you look forward to PvE in AoC or what was the defining feature that you're looking forward to?

Find more posts tagged with

Staff

Comments

Depraved

Dygz wrote: »

Azherae wrote: »

The question is how many people buy shoes.

Would you rather everyone buy shoes or everyone make shoes?

first, not everybody can make "shoes" in ashes. remember the number of fh are limited, so its not even possible for everyone who wants to.

second, not everyone will be interested n making shoes. why don't you make your own clothes, hunt your own food, etc.

by your logic, everyperson in the world would need to become an engineer, but also a doctor, but also a teacher, but also a customer service rep. you are saying "lets not cooperate, instead, everybody has to do everything forget expertise in one thing."

even in hunter-gatherer societies everyone had their specific tasks...

Depraved

Azherae wrote: »

I feel like whatever you just made up that I believe, you win.

I yield to [insert thing you think I believe which you find silly].

Answer given tho.

I made assumptions about what you believe based on previous things you have said in the past. if they are wrong, oh well, just say they are and ill take them back.

but stop trying to argue that 2+2 isn't 4. at this point, you guys are being stubborn.

Azherae

Depraved wrote: »

Azherae wrote: »

I feel like whatever you just made up that I believe, you win.

I yield to [insert thing you think I believe which you find silly].

Answer given tho.

I made assumptions about what you believe based on previous things you have said in the past. if they are wrong, oh well, just say they are and ill take them back.

but stop trying to argue that 2+2 isn't 4. at this point, you guys are being stubborn.

I apologize for having reactions and not focusing on your hypothetical.

Remember that at some point in the past you requested that I stop using this style of communicating with you and switch to one that is less measured because you like it better.

However, the cost of interacting with you the other way is too high on my end. Sorry for that, but I doubt it matters a lot to you.

1-2 hours a week is better than 10-15 hours a day for all Freehold owners in Ashes of Creation.

Depraved

well, if thats your answer (1-2hours) then there's nothing I can do for you my friend. i guess we can stop debating this now. i just wanted to know your answer.

and jesus noaani hasn't even replied yet. I'm gonna have to deal with more nonsense later.

Dygz

Depraved wrote: »

dygz you literally play 8 + hours a day...the hypocrisy.
I'm not asking for whats healthier for a normal life in real. I'm asking for the game itself and people who play it. obviously if you are playing 15 hours a day you arent doing other things with your life, but maybe you don't even need to as your life is already set up. maybe you are retired, maybe you are rich, maybe you even play at work...that's irrelevant, I'm asking for the game itself.

There is no hypocrisy. You did not give 8 hours per day as an option.
You asked which of two options I would prefer. And then when I give my answer, you want to change the parameters.
Not everyone is me.
Everyone is not retired. And your question states "everyone". Your question states "everyone" and everyone is not rich.
So... all of that is relevant when asked what I would prefer everyone to do.

Depraved

Dygz wrote: »

Depraved wrote: »

dygz you literally play 8 + hours a day...the hypocrisy.
I'm not asking for whats healthier for a normal life in real. I'm asking for the game itself and people who play it. obviously if you are playing 15 hours a day you arent doing other things with your life, but maybe you don't even need to as your life is already set up. maybe you are retired, maybe you are rich, maybe you even play at work...that's irrelevant, I'm asking for the game itself.

There is no hypocrisy. You did not give 8 hours per day as an option.
You asked which of two options I would prefer. And then when I give my answer, you want to change the parameters.
Not everyone is me.
Everyone is not retired. And your question states "everyone". Your question states "everyone" and everyone is not rich.
So... all of that is relevant when asked what I would prefer everyone to do.

I mentioned the hypocrisy because you said that's healthier. if you hadn't said that sentence, then I wouldn't have said what I said. remember we are talking about the game, not real life.

also, hypotheticals aren't absurd (although they could be), they are designed to test your logic.

edit: you said I'm changing the parameters, 8 hours wasn't an option. sure lets go with that.

my question was specifically for what's better for players inside the game, not outside the game. yet you picked your answer and said that's better for players outside the game. didn't you just change the parameters of my question?

i know it can be hard to change your answers in a public forum, but come on man, don't be so stubborn.

Mag7spy

When i played new world was I a no lifer cause i worked everyday and played 8-10 hours a day x.x.

What you are saying makes perfect sense to me, though people are naturally going to be conflicted regardless of their own situation if someone has more of an advantage. Hence you get stubbornness about a comment that they rather play 1-2h a week. Though no casual is playing 1-2h a week.

I'm not a casual but based on how i see players its be more like 2-5 hours a day (which can be on and off).

I think this is a lot more variation really in this discussion if people stop fighting and actually had a disccusion together, on both sides of the spectrum. Yes hardcore players will make more, but also high tier crafting isn't a 24/7 production.

Depraved

3 hours every day, tht isnt a casual, that's a dedicated player...

and yeah I get it, you are right when you said people complain about the advantage thing...but those are the same people who also say they don't need to rush, just enjoy the game, take it at their own pace etc, they contradict themselves xDD

there are more reasons why dedicated players should own the freehold. i didn't mention them earlier but it has to do with price.

if everybody was a casual, on top of goods not being produced at the rate people want to buy them, every item will be more expensive since everybody wants the item and there arent enough. so people like dygz who abhor profit and greedines etc is gonna have to deal with that at a large scale, since every item will be overpriced. supply and demand.

that means people will take even longer to get an item, since they will have to farm glint for more hours. and then people are gonna complain about prices xDD

its also worse for new players, it will take them even longer to get anything and catch up with veteran players...

if there were more goods produced, the price of each good will be lower (haven't you guys noticed how the first sword in a server is super expensive, and after a few days, the same sword is just cheap?). this means hardcore players will make it easier for casuals and new players coming into the game to get the items they need, at the expense of their own profit. why would you buy a sword for 1000 gold when there are 10 more people selling the same sword for 500. instead of grinding mobs for 10 hours at 100 gold per hour, now you can get your sword with just 5 hours of grinding. so a casual farming mobs 1 hour a week 5 (hours) weeks, rather than 10. but no, lets all hate on dedicated players for no reason. (before you guys start arguing numbers, they are made up as an example btw)

Dygz

Depraved wrote: »

I mentioned the hypocrisy because you said that's healthier. if you hadn't said that sentence, then I wouldn't have said what I said. remember we are talking about the game, not real life.

That also is absurd.
I rarely spend a day playing video games for 10-15 hours. And, the rare occassions that I do, it is not particularly healthy do so.
But, again, your question is not about me - it's about everyone. And everyone does not have the luxuries that I have that allow me to play 8+ hours a day.
So the answer to your actual question: what do you prefer, every freehold owner to play 1-2 hours a week, or 10-15 hours a day? is, if I only have two choices, I prefer every freehold owner to play 1-2 hours per week.

Depraved wrote: »

also, hypotheticals aren't absurd (although they could be), they are designed to test your logic.

Your hypotheticals are absurd because you have an exceedingly poor grasp of logic - especially in regard to framing logical arguments.

Depraved wrote: »

my question was specifically for what's better for players inside the game, not outside the game. yet you picked your answer and said that's better for players outside the game. didn't you just change the parameters of my question?

That may be what you meant to ask, but it is not what you actually asked.
"Better for the players inside the game" is also absurd and does not include enough parameters to properly evaluate.
What is the server population?
If the server population is primarily Casuals who play 1-2 hours per week - I would prefer for every freehold owner to play 1-2 hours a week.
If the server population is primarily Hardcores who play 10-15 hours per week - it's probably better for most freehold owners to play 10-15 hours a week.
Most likely, each server will have a mix of Casuals and Hardcores.
And, sure, there will be some mix with a majority population of Hardcores where the Hardcores might be frustrated that there are not enough freehold owners spending Hardcore time crafting.

In general, it's not going to be an issue.

Depraved wrote: »

i know it can be hard to change your answers in a public forum, but come on man, don't be so stubborn.

Has nothing to do with me changing my answers and everything to do with you having poor logic... and submitting exceedingly flawed questions. And you, then, changing the parameters of the question as if the original question was logical... when it wasn't.

It is not difficult to reply to your posts accordingly.

(Gotta run across town to the other office.)

blat

Depraved wrote: »

but stop trying to argue that 2+2 isn't 4. at this point, you guys are being stubborn.

Depraved wrote: »

didn't you just change the parameters of my question?

i know it can be hard to change your answers in a public forum, but come on man, don't be so stubborn.

I can't claim to have followed this particular convo but.. yeah I've been here a few times, it's not you.

blat

Dygz wrote: »

Your hypotheticals are absurd because you have an exceedingly poor grasp of logic - especially in regard to framing logical arguments.

Some people here are also far more willing to insult than make any genuine attempt to appreciate your PoV. It's bizarre considering we're discussing an MMO here!

Dygz

blat wrote: »

Some people here are also far more willing to insult than make any genuine attempt to appreciate your PoV. It's bizarre considering we're discussing an MMO here!

Very astute self-reflection you have there.
I’m impressed.

blat

Dygz wrote: »

Very astute self-reflection you have there.
I’m impressed.

Lal alright mate. Do you see any actual insults of mine or was that just more playground levels of tit-for-tat?

Everyone having to dance around your ego issues is getting boring now. Can we just discuss Ashes with an ounce of civility?

Dygz

Oh. No insults from you whatsoever.
🙄

Noaani

Depraved wrote: »

ok sure, lets go with that.

answer these 2 question please, both of you.

what do you prefer, every freehold owner to play 1-2 hours a week, or 10-15 hours a day?

how can people gear up faster and do more content (since you need the gear for it) by having freehold owners who play 1-2 hours a week, or 10-15 hours a day?

The two time ranges you have here are not representative of any reasonable group of MMORPG players.

There would be perhaps 10 people per server that fall in to each group.

Then we also have the notion that Ashes will have some form of limiter to economic activity. It won't be labor, but there will be something.

Thus, it is unlikely that someone would be able to spend 10 hours a day being producive on a freehold.

Thus, with these two points under consideration, your question seems to be invalid.

Depraved

Dygz wrote: »

Depraved wrote: »

I mentioned the hypocrisy because you said that's healthier. if you hadn't said that sentence, then I wouldn't have said what I said. remember we are talking about the game, not real life.

That also is absurd.
I rarely spend a day playing video games for 10-15 hours. And, the rare occassions that I do, it is not particularly healthy do so.
But, again, your question is not about me - it's about everyone. And everyone does not have the luxuries that I have that allow me to play 8+ hours a day.
So the answer to your actual question: what do you prefer, every freehold owner to play 1-2 hours a week, or 10-15 hours a day? is, if I only have two choices, I prefer every freehold owner to play 1-2 hours per week.

Depraved wrote: »

also, hypotheticals aren't absurd (although they could be), they are designed to test your logic.

Your hypotheticals are absurd because you have an exceedingly poor grasp of logic - especially in regard to framing logical arguments.

Depraved wrote: »

my question was specifically for what's better for players inside the game, not outside the game. yet you picked your answer and said that's better for players outside the game. didn't you just change the parameters of my question?

That may be what you meant to ask, but it is not what you actually asked.
"Better for the players inside the game" is also absurd and does not include enough parameters to properly evaluate.
What is the server population?
If the server population is primarily Casuals who play 1-2 hours per week - I would prefer for every freehold owner to play 1-2 hours a week.
If the server population is primarily Hardcores who play 10-15 hours per week - it's probably better for most freehold owners to play 10-15 hours a week.
Most likely, each server will have a mix of Casuals and Hardcores.
And, sure, there will be some mix with a majority population of Hardcores where the Hardcores might be frustrated that there are not enough freehold owners spending Hardcore time crafting.

In general, it's not going to be an issue.

Depraved wrote: »

i know it can be hard to change your answers in a public forum, but come on man, don't be so stubborn.

Has nothing to do with me changing my answers and everything to do with you having poor logic... and submitting exceedingly flawed questions. And you, then, changing the parameters of the question as if the original question was logical... when it wasn't.

It is not difficult to reply to your posts accordingly.

(Gotta run across town to the other office.)

my friend, the hypothetical is designed to test your logic. if your answer Is 1-2 hours a day, then I'm perfectly happy with that and I realize I cant do anything else to convince you that its better for the game and the players to have more dedicated players over casuals (might not be for a different game).

and as you said, not everybody has the luxury to play 8+ hours a day, but we arent talking about everybody, only a small minority. remember that fh owners will be a small minority compared to the whole server population.

you can have all fh owners play 10-15 hours a day (lets say 2000 fh so 2000 players) and the rest 8k-13k players up to 50k eventually can play their 1-2 hours a week, and the game will still be far better for everyone than if every fh owner, and also artisans, only played 1-2 hours a week(well maybe not so good for those hardcore slaves gearing up the whole server xD)

Child Item