GreatPhilisopher wrote: » i am not saying we need bikini armors ( but some for RP wouldn't hurt)
Dolyem wrote: » I'm a bit indifferent since I only play male characters. But as far as people I know personally who actually complain about there not being enough"feminine" "sexy", or "bikini" armor options, not a single one of those concerned have been a dude lmao.
Apok wrote: » it's all the e-girls trying to make their money
Zahie wrote: » I just hope they will make more feminine looking clothes and armor. Alot of the female counterparts to the male version has been really dissapointing, it's almost as bad as the female armor in New World and yikes, those are really bad imo. And to clear things up, "feminine" is not a synonym to "sexy", "skimpy", "bikini", "boobs" etc as some people may think. A feminine appearance can differ alot depending on the aesthetic and culture. It's about shapes and lines that create details that are associated with femininity. It's actually not so much about showing bare skin or exaggerate sexualised parts of the female body.
Ravicus wrote: » "And to clear things up, "feminine" is not a synonym to "sexy", "skimpy", "bikini", "boobs" etc as some people may think.z" This sentence can be your subjective opinion but not the opinion of everyone. Feminine can of course include "sexy", "skimpy", "bikini", "boobs". You may just not like it. You may take offense to it. But many others do not. Don't burdon the game by taking away choices of players and thier playstyles. This is a "high fantasy" game. Not a church sim, or an DEI game (hopefully). If it had a publisher I could see them forcing Intrepid to impliment draconian policies, but fortuntatly they don't. Now I'm not in favor of to much lewd behavior myself, but, I could see it in game in places, and I might or might not go to those places. Just quit limiting choices of people.
Zahie wrote: » Ravicus wrote: » "And to clear things up, "feminine" is not a synonym to "sexy", "skimpy", "bikini", "boobs" etc as some people may think.z" This sentence can be your subjective opinion but not the opinion of everyone. Feminine can of course include "sexy", "skimpy", "bikini", "boobs". You may just not like it. You may take offense to it. But many others do not. Don't burdon the game by taking away choices of players and thier playstyles. This is a "high fantasy" game. Not a church sim, or an DEI game (hopefully). If it had a publisher I could see them forcing Intrepid to impliment draconian policies, but fortuntatly they don't. Now I'm not in favor of to much lewd behavior myself, but, I could see it in game in places, and I might or might not go to those places. Just quit limiting choices of people. Now you are reading in a lot of things I haven't said and you claim I have opinions that I don't have. I haven't even said anything about my personal opinions. Please don't do that read it literally and not as what you think it means. It's just that when people say they want more feminine armor there is always a bunch of people that immediately complain that they don't want bikini armors, boob armor and such in their game, as if they believe that "feminine" is a synonym to that. And as you say, what people find sexy is very individual.
Hinotori wrote: » I'm glad I got in early purely for these cosmetics where the female option differs and isn't a copy paste. along with 2 other robe/ballroom style sets. Male version (on female model):@GreatPhilisopher is right, 90% of the cosmetics look like these lower two and it's made me wonder many times why Intrepid has added the option for a second gender when they clearly don't want them to be seen. (I'd also appreciate the above armor set going back to the outrageously offensive sky blue colour it is in the concept. It looked amazing, unless its a vfx thing. In which case: as you were.) I hold out hope that we'll get more costumes and ingame styles like the first 2. where the femininity can shine through with just some nice tweaks to differentiate the two because right now it's disappointing.
Hinotori wrote: »