Which archetype will you play?

Genuine question.

Which archetype... and why?

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

We still dont have all the base classes and none of sub classes. Just on my play style and my Desire to delve deep into the Bard, I will be going Bard/Bard when we get the sub classes. I played a Minstrel in DAoC so it also seems fitting lol

Caww

Ranger - because who doesn't want to be cool?

Hinotori

Archwizard and falconer

Sathrago

Shadowmancer because im under the self conjured illusion that ill be able to do some really cool things with shadows like making the target's own shadow come alive and attack them, summon a horde of little shade creatures to rush forward in a tide latching on and murderlizing groups of enemies, etc.

PenguinPaladin

Sathrago wrote: »

Shadowmancer because im under the self conjured illusion that ill be able to do some really cool things with shadows like making the target's own shadow come alive and attack them, summon a horde of little shade creatures to rush forward in a tide latching on and murderlizing groups of enemies, etc.

This guys making heartless from kingdom hearts over here

xemnitas

Trickster sounds good to me, maybe something like.... buffs allies with music and debuff enemies with traps and mines that slows and poisons

mfckingjoker

Cleric, healing is fun

Khronus

I will be playing Tank/X everything except bard and cleric.

Skkellan

Farming_ wrote: »

Genuine question.

Which archetype... and why?

It depends on which archetype will allow me to become a cruel and merciless god.

Primarch001

At launch, Warlock, Acolyte, or Necro are my best guesses.

Hutchy1989

Paladin or Highsword.

Aszkalon

Farming_ wrote: »

Genuine question.

Which archetype... and why?

Since Necromancy is my Game, []Summoner+Cleric[] will be my Name.

Of Course, i want to try out the Ranger and the Rogue as well. But i am not sure if i should do anything else but to purely flesh out their Main Archetypes.

nerdymilkshake

Depending on what summoner variant has the coolest summons, if they decide to make them change based on subclass.

I'm assuming not though, so probably just plain Conjurer. Beastmaster if they do.

Apok

gonna go tank so I can rollplay as a douchebag

Really though I'm looking forward to Tank/ranger for easy pulls maybe? and tank/fighter for optimized dps and if class switching isn't too terrible maybe do tank/mage for possible aoe tanking.

riggler

I'm torn between Cleric and Bard primary archetype...I like to heal so Cleric would be logical, but I enjoyed the dev stream of the Bard last month...I could see going Cleric primary and then secondary as Bard or even Tank and become a Paladin!!!!

Caeryl

I want Summoner to be good because Summoner+Bard on paper sounds like an engaging support option

Likewise Cleric+Summoner I'm really hoping is totem based (with a name like Shaman, surely)

And one concept I've been wanting is a reptilian Tulnar that's a Rogue/Ranger, specifically because they could be a chameleon

BackgroundDust

I like being glass cannon so my guess would be.. archwizard?

Shabooey

I want to try out the Knight to see how much the Fighter augments can improve the DPS output of a Tank.

Chunka

The first one that caught my attention was soulbow but i dont like how ranger looks atm so im waiting for rogue

Dr3amerA

So far im thinking Summoner. I have tried summoner but i have never played dedicated summoner.

My dream right now is Shadowmancer (Summoner/Rogue) if it gives sufficient Solo Leveling vibes.
Then it would be Necromancer/Conjurer

It all depends on how the testing will go.
Tank, Bard, Cleric and Mage come next.

Child Item