nerdymilkshake wrote: » Depending on what summoner variant has the coolest summons, if they decide to make them change based on subclass.
Farming_ wrote: » Genuine question.Which archetype... and why?
PenguinPaladin wrote: » Sathrago wrote: » Shadowmancer because im under the self conjured illusion that ill be able to do some really cool things with shadows like making the target's own shadow come alive and attack them, summon a horde of little shade creatures to rush forward in a tide latching on and murderlizing groups of enemies, etc. This guys making heartless from kingdom hearts over here
Sathrago wrote: » Shadowmancer because im under the self conjured illusion that ill be able to do some really cool things with shadows like making the target's own shadow come alive and attack them, summon a horde of little shade creatures to rush forward in a tide latching on and murderlizing groups of enemies, etc.
Kashiwaba wrote: » Do they have screenshots or at least concept art of how these classes are going to look like? I feel like that would convince me a lot more on what to choose.
AirborneBerserker wrote: » IDK all the classes seem extremely meh. Usually if the game has a Shaman class I play that, been that way since EQ1 but this game will break that streak since Cleric + Summoner doesn't give Shaman vibes. It gives I do not fucking know vibes. When the game doesn't have a Shaman class they usually have a naturalistic caster which this game doesn't have. So I'll probably wait and see what happens. If nothing strikes my fancy I will probably skip the game entirely, because the idea of playing a class I'm not really excited about through a game that is always on PvP with just frustrate me and I'll end up quitting anyway.
AirborneBerserker wrote: » IUsually if the game has a Shaman class I play that, been that way since EQ1 but this game will break that streak since Cleric + Summoner doesn't give Shaman vibes. It gives I do not fucking know vibes.