Glorious Alpha Two Testers!

Alpha Two Phase II testing is currently taking place 5+ days each week. More information about testing schedule can be found here

If you have Alpha Two, you can download the game launcher here, and we encourage you to join us on our Official Discord Server for the most up to date testing news.

Should all KS backers of AoC get alpha access?

ArchivedUserArchivedUser Guest
in Forum and Discord Help
Should all KS backers of AoC get alpha access?

I for one say we should !

https://strawpoll.com/7w2agzg

Comments

  • ArchivedUserArchivedUser Guest
    If you bought at least the founder pack than yes... they have set up the alpha and beta access pretty well.
  • ArchivedUserArchivedUser Guest
    The simple answer is no.
     And here's why. The Alpha can't be a large scale event as it an in all reality a testing phase where plays go around looking for bugs or problems before the beta and then submit them to the devs. 

    What most people forget is that the alpha will only be able to hold so many people at a time. If you want to have large scale testing then you start a beta as that has most of the alpha problems fixed and then players can see the game and help here and there.
  • ArchivedUserArchivedUser Guest

    If it was part of your pledge then sure, but if it wasn't, then no. It's what people paid for and all backers should get what they paid for. I wouldn't even advocate that all $500 + pledgers should get alpha at the same time because there's simply too many.

  • ArchivedUserArchivedUser Guest
    Alpha is not meant to be a large scale test, so no.
  • ArchivedUserArchivedUser Guest
    And it's not a democracy. They'll test how they want to test. Testing is about the project itself not who gets to play tester. It sucks, but that's why it's testing and not playing. Testing is just a synonym for the dirty work.
  • ArchivedUserArchivedUser Guest
    Of Course not !
    Young Squire
  • ArchivedUserArchivedUser Guest
    I think they should get exactly what they backed, having more and more people in an alpha isn't always a good thing.

    Some people just simply aren't cut out for playing during the alpha phase of development and I hope that having at least that higher price point for the alpha packages will mean a lot less of these types of players.
  • ArchivedUserArchivedUser Guest
  • ArchivedUserArchivedUser Guest
    no
  • ArchivedUserArchivedUser Guest
    OneWingedAngel said:
    no
    simple, sweet and straight to the point I like it
  • ArchivedUserArchivedUser Guest
  • ArchivedUserArchivedUser Guest
    Hm. So, the devs should change the KS-exclusive right of some of the contributors to be handed out to everyone, including those who didn't contribute at that level.

    Why?
  • ArchivedUserArchivedUser Guest
    Please no.  It was set as a way to entice people to purchase higher tiers of KS package.  It also ensures more participation in bug reports and such.  If someone drops more money on an unlaunched game, they have a higher stake on it turning out as close to perfect as possible at launch
  • ArchivedUserArchivedUser Guest
    nagash said:
    The simple answer is no.
     And here's why. The Alpha can't be a large scale event as it an in all reality a testing phase where plays go around looking for bugs or problems before the beta and then submit them to the devs. 

    What most people forget is that the alpha will only be able to hold so many people at a time. If you want to have large scale testing then you start a beta as that has most of the alpha problems fixed and then players can see the game and help here and there.

    ^This. 

    There is a practical limit to the size of an alpha test.  Besides, Beta access  will still allow you to figure out what to do at launch.
  • ArchivedUserArchivedUser Guest
    with the live servers only holding a concurrent player base of 10k, having all 16k backers on the test server would probally cause issues, and how many of those 16k would actually be there to test the game, other than use it for a way to play the game early
This discussion has been closed.