Neurath wrote: » When it was said 'Not everything will be in the game at launch.' I wondered what wouldn't be present at launch. Its like a riddle, forms conundrums and makes me scratch my head.
Kneifer wrote: » Hello, To clarify: Many people want to play a game with top knox graphics and AoC should provide this as good as possible. But good graphics come with a cost - it requires players to have relatively strong computers. What I really wish for is an option to downscale the graphics to meet the limited capabilities of my PC, when the game is released. If players with mediocre PCs are still able to play the game with decent fps, the potential customer base is much bigger - especially in poorer societies. So please, make the game as visually apealing as you are capable, but do not enforce this by limiting the bars in the graphic settings. Sincerly, a jobless math/economy student
Aardvark wrote: » I reject the idea that I must have terrible graphics in my game because your computer can't handle good graphics. If you want low to mid level graphics that is what console games are for. But seriously games have graphics settings unless your computer is older than most peoples kids you should be able to play on low settings.
Kneifer wrote: » Aardvark wrote: » I reject the idea that I must have terrible graphics in my game because your computer can't handle good graphics. If you want low to mid level graphics that is what console games are for. But seriously games have graphics settings unless your computer is older than most peoples kids you should be able to play on low settings. Please stop this elitist behaviour. I am a PC owner and I do not want to be associated with this console rabble. But seriously, from my experience games nowadays are displaying beautiful graphics I dont really care about and my 10 y old pc cannot handle. The actual system requirements of the game my system passes barely and it would be a shame if the minimum system requirements would be raised for forced better graphics.
hazardnumberseven wrote: » omg CONSUL SCRUB LOLolOlOl pc master race!!11!1one!1ONE1!!!1 Just kidding. Sort of. PC is the best, but it's more consumer friendly to have both high performance options and low performance options. Not only is it great for players to have these options, but it's great for developers, testing and all sorts of things including accessibility to the game, at no cost to the PC gamer community. The problem between PC gamers and console gamers comes from games being designed FOR console and being ported to PC, limiting us PC gamers to poor performance, 30fps, low graphics and all that despite being able to handle it and more. But don't worry. This is 1000% not the case with AoC. This game is a PC game, and not a port. We will get 60fps and great graphics. Probably just a slight misunderstanding, I think some people just want the option of lower end graphics just in case.
akabear wrote: » I am not sure if Moore`s Law is still applicable (Moore's law is the observation that the number of transistors in a dense integrated circuit (IC) doubles about every two years. ) but if the game is to release in a year or two from now, then the likelihood of the game being more playable on a broader range of computers with what it is now is highly increased.
hazardnumberseven wrote: » akabear wrote: » I am not sure if Moore`s Law is still applicable (Moore's law is the observation that the number of transistors in a dense integrated circuit (IC) doubles about every two years. ) but if the game is to release in a year or two from now, then the likelihood of the game being more playable on a broader range of computers with what it is now is highly increased. Earlier in 2019, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang declared that Moore's Law is no longer possible.
