New Lazy Peon video, and some thoughts on how MMOs have become lobby based games.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_2ttuyE1Rg&ab_channel=TheLazyPeon

Really good video that got me thinking. So I figured I would be social and bounce some thoughts off the forums. Anyway...

When he says that of our current MMOs, everything feels like a 5 out of 10. Man does that hit home. For me nothing has felt above a 5 or 6 out of 10 for more than a month of play since the Darkfall: New Dawns Alpha/Beta Which was like a 7 for me. The thing that really got me though was when he talked about how WOW and FFXIV could just be lobby based games, and are not massively multiplayer at all. This is true, but he only scratches the surface here.

They could very well be lobby based games, but it is somewhat worst than that. In both FFXIV and WOW it is very common to only raid with your static or guild. Unless you pug, which I do often. You don't really have a reason to meet anyone new. I have numerous people I have met pugging in both FFXIV and WOW. I only pug because I work nights, and my buddy who I tend to pug with works 3 on 4 off nights. Otherwise I would just do what the majority does and raid with only a guild/static.

So in my estimation. The average intended player experience in WOW/FFXIV is that you log in. Do the same content with the same 8 to 24 people once a week. Then do your chores with or without those people. The only opportunity to meet someone new is pug filling a slot or random solo ques, but lets face it. Most people don't meet anyone new doing random dungeons. In fact the only time I have ever thought to make a friend in a random dungeon is if someone's DPS is high for there class.

So yeah, MMOs have mostly become a lobby based game where most people don't even use the whole lobby. Open world content is a joke in most MMOs. That to me is what makes Ashes so compelling. It is not a lobby based game at all. Only 20% of the game is instanced. The open world is looking like it is going to be harsh enough to force people to work together. Guild's will need to be bigger than 8-24 man groups to get things done. Guilds will need to work together to protect and advance their node. This really is big.

As much as I like instanced raiding. I think I have come around to the idea that even if open worlds raids only would be a joke as far as mechanics are concerned. I would gladly give them up to go back to those days of fighting over a world boss in L2. Things were just more social back then. L2 was a primitive game, but it was more social than WOW. You would meet people just because they were in a spot you liked to grind.

Lazy peon said he is done with the genre is Ashes don't deliver. Personally I got my fall games. Dual Universe and Crowfall, but I do think what Ashes is trying to bring back, and advance is really important. We might not all get everything we want out of Ashes. The combat might not be as good as X game, the crafting might not be as good as X game, the economy might not be as good as EVE, but the some of the parts is looking important.

I tried to think of was to make this post shorter, but editing it only makes it longer.

So yeah, do y'all agree that current MMOs are practically lobby based games? Do you think Ashes will help change this?

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Vhaeyne

Okeydoke wrote: »

Believe me Andy, Vhaeyne, and BlackBrony, I'm on your side. I almost deleted my post above after re reading it because I felt it was a little too savage. Savagely true. But I'm on your side, I don't want Intrepid to bend at all with their design philosophies and end up making a game like all the other nonsense on the market.

All I meant was if there were other ways they could rope some of those people back in, that would be great. I want CONVERTS lol. If those kinds of players get reeled back in, maybe they begin to realize what a good game is again. Because we have to face it, WE are the dying breed. We kind of need converts if we want more good games going forward for years to come.

But no, at no time should Intrepid ever begin to bend to those types of players design wishes. They either convert or begone. haha

I appreciate you integrity not deleting your post. I know I can come off as a dick in my responses as well.

You are right, we need converts. I think we can get a lot of converts if people see others having fun with the game. I know I was initially put off by Darkfall which quickly became a favorite of mine. All my friend had to do was show me some ship v ship PvP videos, and I was willing to learn to deal with the fact that your mount can get killed right under you. I think once players can put out videos that accurately depict the game. People will know what they are willing to put up with and convert accordingly.

mcstackerson

Okeydoke wrote: »

All I meant was if there were other ways they could rope some of those people back in, that would be great. I want CONVERTS lol. If those kinds of players get reeled back in, maybe they begin to realize what a good game is again. Because we have to face it, WE are the dying breed. We kind of need converts if we want more good games going forward for years to come.

To me, the problem with your post is it makes assumptions of what a generation desires for game design based on features we currently have in MMOs.

For starters, I didn't make those decisions but I don't think instant teleporting was added to MMOs because they wanted to appeal to children. I've played these games for almost 20 years and i saw those features gradually added for convenience reasons without fully understanding how it would affect gameplay.

On the other side of this argument, If we look at the games popular with the younger generation, I don't see this trend.

The most popular game with young kids for the longest time was minecraft. A sandbox game where players are free to explore and build whatever they want. From my perspective, the game doesn't bombard them with instant gratification. It allows them to explore and build whatever they want.

Next to minecraft, you have fortnite and while I'd say it has more action the minecraft, it's still slower than a game like COD. There is plenty of time running across a map and if you get killed, you have to start another game. Only one person or squad can win.

The latest hotness seems to be Among us which I also don't see as being about giving its players instant gratification.

dewan58

Mahdi wrote: »

I think alot of what is being mentioned and being discussed is either vague or niave.

Saying to remove lobbies from an mmo ignores alot of the changes to peoples ability to communicate and gather online compared to the past. Discord exists now, you can't go back from that. If a game does not make creating or finding groups easy enough in game, it will be done outside of the game.

For example, ff14 added a new large-scale dungeon/raid in its last patch. It requires 48 people. You could just put up a listing that you are forming a party, but it will never form. The only method the community uses is pre-forming parties outside the game in discord, sometimes a day ahead of time.

I, personally, hate the idea that to play a game well or to use my time efficiently I need to join X discord to play the game. And in that viewpoint, ashes needs to have some functionality that will not encourage people to play ashes on a discord forming party server. If that means a global chat channel, or a global party finder system like ff14, ill be fine with that.

Also on the point of an mmo should be an mmo and not a lobby simulator. What is an mmo to you? Is it a long walk to a dungeon, is it meeting new people and not playing with the same people, or is it doing content with people outside of a dungeon/raid setting? I think of an mmo as a theme-park, what someone said they hated about current mmos, in that there are different things to do for different people. Bored of the raid area, go to the pvp area or the explore area. Mmos are mmos because of the size of things to do that aren't in a straight line of progression.

This existed in older MMO's too, there use to be server Team Speak channels or various forums. Sure it wasn't as accessible as discord. Personally I have less of an issue with group finding tools and more of the tools that instantly teleport you across the world.

My first MMO (we are all a little bias with our first game in the genre) was DAoC. It did have a portal system, but it had a bit more unique approach to it. You ended up purchasing a token and a mage NPC came and ported all players on a portal once per minute. It was kind of a nice way to interact with other players as you waited to be ported to various places around the world.

There is a lot of talk here on what makes an MMORPG and for me, it is the world and how a game will encourage you to explore it. A good Open world RPG doesn't go out of it's way to hold your hand the entire way. Vanilla WoW was praised because you had this big open world to explore and you weren't always lead down a linear path. Compare that to current WoW where questing involves a singular path, zones are cramped with stuff always going on and there is very little left to explore or discover.

Instanced content has also become the norm. Some of my favorite parts of DAoC were the dungeons. While you still had to zone into them, they were shared server-wide and many of them were huge. You could solo the upper layers of the dungeons, but if you wanted to travel deeper you needed a group. One of the most beloved dungeons was one that was shared across all 3 factions. PvP occurred there, it had raid bosses, and one could easily get lost in it. For a time, there wasn't a dungeon map that told you your position within it.

maouw

I wonder if there's a way to add funnels that catch the people trying to find "fast travel" or "dungeon queues" that direct them to healthier ways of travelling/forming a party.

For dungeon queues - maybe some sort of noticeboard in the nearest Tavern where you can write your name if you're ready to go, and then clear your name when you're done?

Percimes

Fast(er) travel was always a thing in demand. Instant travel, not so much.

Everyone begged for Spirit of Wolf in EQ. Druids and wizards had group teleport spells, but these were provided by the players, they were services people charged for and many would gladly pay for them.

DAoC had horse routes, you'd pay a NPC and a horse would carry you to the town you bought the ride for. Sometime you needed more than one ride to get where you wanted. Sometime you had to jump off the horse to buy a ride that was only available from a mid destination from your first one.

There were no player mounts in these games though.

Noaani

Percimes wrote: »

Fast(er) travel was always a thing in demand. Instant travel, not so much.

Yeah, I don't think the issue is fast travel, it is instant travel.

The thing with SoW in EQ and EQ2 is that you still needed to know where you were going, and you still needed to pay attention. If you didn't pay attention, you could still quite easily die.

Basically, even with SoW on, you were still actually playing the game. You were travelling faster to your destination, but you were still playing the game while travelling there.

To me, this is what Steven should be doing rather than a family summons.

Noaani

Mahdi wrote: »

I think alot of what is being mentioned and being discussed is either vague or niave.

I think it is your post that is niave, to be honest.

Sure, you can go on to Discord or what ever to find groups, that's great. The purpose of not having a dungeon finder is not to make groups harder to form - it is to make it so you have to actually decide who to take (and by extention, who to not take).

If there are a half dozen people on your server that you don't want to group with, you simply won't include them in your group when you are forming it - this is true whether you form it in game or on discord.

On the other hand, if you use a dungeon finder, you join a queue, and are then thrown in an instance with how ever many other players makes up a group in the game you happen to be playing at the time. Not only is there no selection of participants on your part, but the people that do join your group are likely not even from the same server as you.

The thing that you are missing though, the thing that makes your post seem competely niave, is the fact that the goal of these systems is not for players to continue to form groups or raids in chat channels, or on discord. The idea is that people will form groups made up exclusively of players they have grouped with or raided with before.

This is how MMO's used to be - and it is how they should be again. This is the step MMO's need to take back before they can take any further steps forward.

Mahdi

@Noaani

I don't think you read or understood parts of the thread. OP was talking about lack of doing anything with new people and wanted all forms of lobbies removed. You are talking about not wanting to do things with (some) new people at all. Its wierd how two completly opposing views are both say removing "lobbies" will fix it.
Well it would wierd except both of you are using the term and talking about different things.

OP and I were both talking about features in ff14, you on the other hand sound like you are talking about wow. In ff14 dungeon finder and party finder are two greatly different things. Dungeon finder is a queue system that pops you into a dungeon with other queued people. Party finder is a function that can be viewed globally to see people doing X and you can join them, and then the party leader can keep you or remove you before you do the content.

My post only referenced party finder, a way to find people doing stuff your interested in outside of a guild. I didn't talk about a dungeon finder in my post and don't give a damn about it. But I'll reiterate my views, this game needs a way to find other people to do stuff outside of 3rd party websites/discord being the only way to find like-minded players.

XerayReaper

Vhaeyne wrote: »

Noaani wrote: »

It isn't purely instancing that has caused this, though that was the very top of the slope. It was the ability to immediately travel to that instance and back to town that made MMO's little more than lobby based games.

I had not thought about that. I know I am part of the problem. If you give me fast travel I will use it. I will fast if the walk is more than 30 feet in FFXIV. Contrast that to FFXI where walking across town could take like 10 minutes.

You rarely have to walk anywhere in WOW with two hearth stones. The only time it feels like a old MMO is pugging Mythic+ dungeons. You have to make a group, and walk out to the dungeon. The first two people there are already summoning normally and mounts are so fast that this feels like a shadow of the former game.

Things like no fast travel, no flying mounts( for most), local banking/markets. Are really going to help take the lobby feel out of the game.

I totally agree with you on that. The only thing close to Fast Travel were the Crags you HAD to find in certain zones, if you wanted to get to a certain region asap without running on foot, chocobo, or airship(or all the above period). And even then, you'd NEED to have a WHM with the spell to teleport you to that Crag; which, in most cases costed a good amount of gil(oh Jueno, how I miss you lol). It really made the game feel more...alive immersive, since you needed to communicate with people in order to really get anywhere and progress. I do admit that Fast Travel is a great quality of life feature for MMOs, but if you can just go anywhere at anytime, it kind of kills the point of an well crafted MMO world.

One of the reasons I enjoyed FFXI over FFXIV, personally. MMOs have just fallen into that excuse of, "Well, people just don't have a lot of time these days, so we try to make things quicker for them." Okay, I can understand that notion, but if they don't have time to play an MMO; I'm sorry, tough luck. Why play an MMO at all, when you can only take out 1 hour of your busy day; when MMOs have ALWAYS, for the most part, been extremely time consuming games that required a huge amount of commitment in order to progress. I don't wanna sound like some "hardcore" gamer or elitest, but catering to the casual crowed has honestly ruined modern MMOs, in my opinion; there's no longer that great feeling of accomplishment of grind for a Legendary weapon drop for a good month, now that anyone can get a weapon just as good as said Legendary by buying it at a Special Currency Shop.

Personally, Modern MMOs always feel like when you're in a competition, and you lose, but still get a trophy for participation. It just undermines all the hard work the person in first place has done, and makes it so everyone is a winner in the end. As my brother and I, who used to play FFXIV consistently, have said, "this game is just WoW with a FF skin over it". It doesn't even play out as an RPG, since decking out your stats really don't matter, and trying to play a class a certain way that feeds into your own playstyle, is punishing; players have little to no agency on how they wish to play the game at all, the only thing they DO have agency over is playing dress up. There's no point in Diety signs, elemental stats, or even your Relic Weapon you grind for. It's only successful because of the casual fanbase; and not saying that's bad or anything, but it really just ruined the overall game for me, which is why I've left it, regardless of how "good" it's story is.

Sorry for the rant, but just thinking of FFXIV always makes me rage a bit. I hate how the players believe FFXIV is a masterpiece of an MMO; it's not. It only succeeds because of the IP, as well as all the fanservice the game has in it, as well as collaborations with other IPs. The gameplay is flashy, so that keeps people's attention long enough not to notice how dull the combat feels, or how barebones a lot of their classes are too. If they didn't have consistent content drops like, every 2 months, and an expansion every 1-2 years; the game would be empty most of the time.

This is exactly why I'm excited for this game; tired of PvP focused MMOs, or the themepark orientated causal MMOs. I want a MMO that really makes the player feel like they're in control of their OWN adventure and actually impact the world they're in. FFXIV doesn't even feel ALIVE for the most part; there's no reason to revisit zone, the world isn't impacted the players, but obviously the developers; which sucks, because I remember that 1.0 had events that would have Fast Travel points taken over so players couldn't use it until it was liberated(kind of like GW2). Ironically, FFXI did something like that, with the Campaign feature, which in a way was kind of a competitive PvEvP experience to control other regions, which in turn lowered taxes at shops and Auction houses(I think); nothing crazy, but it was cool back then in the early 2000s for an MMO, I'd say.

Vhaeyne

@Mahdi

I don't see the topic of in-game tools as being directly related to the server-lobby state we see with modern MMOs, but here are my thoughts on in-game tools.

I can personally speak group finding tools in FFXIV and WOW. Even in FFXIV there are things like the Discord ("Primal Raid Community") shout out to them for all the good work they do. WOW has similar Discords. These discords are used to accomplish things that the game already provides, but Discord always ends up being a more powerful and effective tool.

I have a few theories as to why Discord is better than any in-game tools for group forming I have encountered.

1: Most people keep discord up whilst they are not even in the game, and will tab over the the group finding channel to see if there is a group worth logging on to join when they are doing other things.

2: Discords voice chat and channel system is and always will be superior to anything a MMO creates as a side project. It is just a matter that Discord is hyper-specialized in providing robust communication tools.

3: Discord works cross games. If you friend people on discord when you have had a good pug. You might see them down the line in another game you are playing, and pug with them again.

4: Discord has become a expectation. Even if the game has built in voice. Most guilds in most games will still use discord.

5: Game servers are less reliable than Discord. Every single MMO has less uptime than discord. You can get DCed from the game and still maintain full voice chat with your party. This is big.

I am not under the illusion that we can go back to a more primitive time where in order to meet people in game you had to shout in town or go to the entrance of the dungeon, and whisper random people asking if that have a free slot in their party. I also don't think that in-game tools are worth developing with discord present.

A few patches ago FFXIV implemented a new feature where you could create in-game community with bulletin boards. I think they are called "Fellowships". Just like "Party Finder", Link shells", and "Free Companies". Most of these community's have a corresponding Discord that is used more. Realistically the only people using these in-game tools are luddites. I can't stress enough that I would not have a single problem with in-game party finder tools if I thought people would use them. The only reason people use "Duty finder" or "Random Dungeon Que" is because they from and teleport you to content that is so easy you will take the risk of random party members. For any other content, discord ends up being king. Yes, people will use "Party finder" or "Group Finder", but even then they will link you a discord as soon as you join. Remember WOW also has in-game voice chat. No one uses it.

What I think will keep Ashes from being a server-lobby MMO, and why Ashes is important. Is the focus on keeping the player in the world, and moving about it manually. Quickly forming a group is fine if you still have to meet up and make your way to the dungeon. This is why I said that mythic+ in WOW is a shadow of the old way. You still have to make a group and two people have to get to the dungeon on their own. Which is trivial in WOW. FFXIV, I literally never leave the patch of area between my house in the market board in from of my house. I have zero reason to. Ashes on the other hand, you are going to need to escort caravans to make the most out of your work, and everything in out in a ever changing world.

Again I don't think in-game grouping tools are the devil. I just don't think they are worth developing. Too many people are just going to use Discord. There is some promise in the fact that the world is so big that people might prefer the use the Tavern grouping system, due to the need to form local groups. I am fine with this so long as people need to use the world too.

Noaani

Mahdi wrote: »

You are talking about not wanting to do things with (some) new people at all.

No I'm not.

You can't create an in game friends list of people you know are worth bringing along to a group if you don't first group with new people. Even when you do have a substantial list of people you enjoy grouping with, you still need to continually add to it to make up for people that leave the game, or that refocus on other activities.

I am talking about the expectation that groups that are organized last minute should be expected to be viable - they should not. They may happen to work out on occasion, but that should not be the expectation.

The problem with a party finder (which is in many, many games) is that people just don't use them. They are no easier to use or more successful than simply looking for people in open chat, and suffer from the same issue of most people being organized enough to already have plans, and so not being willing to join random groups.

Pick up groups should be looked at as a means of meeting new people worth grouping up with in order to do the things you want to do. They should not be looked at as a means of doing the things you want to do.

Ramirez

MMOrpg genre is turned in single player experience , here people can solo everything without 0 social interaction just using looking for group or other casual tools.

Other big problem is the endgame pvp/pve is always instanced, so you have a dead world ..

What i loved in mmorpg i don´t have anymore, a thing called Risk/reward, now you are always rewarded you never lose, so in the end every player easily get what they want and consequently leave the game...

The only MMORPG i kinda have the same feeling is Eve, but i m not into spaceships and Albion online, beside being a crapy lowtier mmorpg , have what i like in old mmorpgs, politics, healthy economy, alot of social interaction especially in open world pvp , and is risky as hell...

Dreoh

Percimes wrote: »

Fast(er) travel was always a thing in demand. Instant travel, not so much.

Everyone begged for Spirit of Wolf in EQ. Druids and wizards had group teleport spells, but these were provided by the players, they were services people charged for and many would gladly pay for them.

DAoC had horse routes, you'd pay a NPC and a horse would carry you to the town you bought the ride for. Sometime you needed more than one ride to get where you wanted. Sometime you had to jump off the horse to buy a ride that was only available from a mid destination from your first one.

There were no player mounts in these games though.

This is actually a pretty nice system, I am of the mind that any sort of faster travel should be costly if implemented at all.

The unfortunate thing about gaming is unless you force a player to smell the roses they will optimize themselves out of that experience.

Ostaff

Totally agree. Fast travel and and too much Instancing definitely kill MMOs.

Immersion is what is needed. And a good AI for NPC helps drastically with that

One concept on dungeon raids I've bantered about is having dungeons with smart bosses that control the dungeon environment and lead its minions more than just "waiting in the same room at the very end and being killed when players enter its room". This boss may "remember" players who have been to its dungeon before and act accordingly. Escape when the players are getting too close to it and return to the dungeon or another dungeon it makes much later. Make snide comments to players who fail for their tricks.

Can't wait for the quantum servers to come around, cause I think once they do... it will change the face of the MMOs and actually be able to give us good AI and immersion.

novercalis

Andy wrote: »

Okeydoke wrote: »

Nevertheless, Ashes devs still have to TRY to appeal to that market of young gamers that want to teleport instantly everywhere and have dungeon groups placed in a platter in front of them. So how do you do that? Well I don't know exactly.

This type of players have a lot of games for this.

For ONCE a MMORPG will be release without all of this type of features let's not transform it into an ANOTHER WoW/FF14 clone.

During the "release hype" this forum will be flooded of those type of players asking LFG/LFR/TP/P2Fast/No outdoor content etc... I really really hope that Intrepid won't listent to them. They'll be gone in few weeks anyway because that's how they consume MMORPG.

agree - go to AoC on reddit and people are just learning and are upset about the quest marker not being there and how it's weird and confusing. EXPECT TONS OF repost spams on this very subject once the NDA is lifted, During Beta and Launch day.

I am an older gamer, I wish I can force everyone to play original Zelda they way I did. We had no internet, no gamefaqs, no instruction. That game was difficult to beat and it was mind blowing hearing a tibdit of info from your friend in School, or managed to learn from it on a magazine 6-7 months later. LIKE WHAT I CAN BLOW UP A TREE TO UNLOCK A CAVE?!

Or send people back into time, the EQ days where you had to type specific key words with the NPC to advance the dialog and get a quest.

People want EZ / Fast mode. They don't want to interact and be social. They want to be a solo player in a MMO world. We can't allow those people to dictate the direction of the game. Go be a voyeurs somewhere else.

Vhaeyne

novercalis wrote: »

agree - go to AoC on reddit and people are just learning and are upset about the quest marker not being there and how it's weird and confusing. EXPECT TONS OF repost spams on this very subject once the NDA is lifted, During Beta and Launch day.

I am an older gamer, I wish I can force everyone to play original Zelda they way I did. We had no internet, no gamefaqs, no instruction. That game was difficult to beat and it was mind blowing hearing a tibdit of info from your friend in School, or managed to learn from it on a magazine 6-7 months later. LIKE WHAT I CAN BLOW UP A TREE TO UNLOCK A CAVE?!

Or send people back into time, the EQ days where you had to type specific key words with the NPC to advance the dialog and get a quest.

People want EZ / Fast mode. They don't want to interact and be social. They want to be a solo player in a MMO world. We can't allow those people to dictate the direction of the game. Go be a voyeurs somewhere else.

This is part of the reason I am on here everyday fighting the good fight. There is type of person that is far too in abundance now a days that want things handed to them. I imagine the perfect game for them is whatever dystopia the humans in that movie wall-e live in. Where they sit back and life takes them from one place to another showing them things and dip feeding them endorphins.

You hit the nail on the head. I am so sick of "Quality of life" "Improvements" ruining games. I honestly wish I had the patience to argue on reddit too, but I know that hivemind would have me shadow banned in a month.

maouw

Yeah, I hope there's a way to flag these things to modern gamers early on.
It never really works trying to tell someone directly that "What you expect is bad."

Ezenkrul

The state of the MMO genre really does sadden me especially when it seems like there is a huge chunk of people who are just holding out hope for something worth it all.
I'd have to say we are a pretty resilient group.
Ashes and Intrepid have always stood out to me because I've seen the passion and fire over the years and it has not wavered.

ariatras

ezenkrul87 wrote: »

The state of the MMO genre really does sadden me especially when it seems like there is a huge chunk of people who are just holding out hope for something worth it all.
I'd have to say we are a pretty resilient group.
Ashes and Intrepid have always stood out to me because I've seen the passion and fire over the years and it has not wavered.

The problem is, MMOs have historically been a rather niche market. I wonder how steady a playerbase Ashes needs to grow and develop post-launch and how big. Nowadays if an MMO doesn't have a million of concurrent players it's considered by many a "failure"

Ostaff

To be honest, most of the modern MMOs that have come out are just boring. They put all their effort in to looking good but without any real content or anything to "keep" people playing.

When things are "given" to you, there is no commitment, there is no "YES! I finally did it!", there is no immersion, and catering to the Casual and Solo player push has seriously watered down the MMOs because they need all the fast travel, give-me's and etc in order to play within their slotted time frames. Yes, catering to them will make a company more money for a "short" while, but it will never give them a dedicated player base cause their games are just not-interesting. More like that 1001 Idler games.

However, since there are SOOO many of these types of players, they all have a loud voice in "pushing" their "I want to be able to play by myself cause I just don't have time to be friends so let me be able to do everything in the game" agenda. As long as companies listen to them, they will never produce a great MMO game which by definition is a Multiplayer game.

I've followed AoC for a long time now even though I've just recently bought in (waiting on Alpha) just because I hate buying in too early and seeing the mmo making companies give-in to the solo/casual players.

Thankfully we have several companies producing mmos from passion now and not for money. Gives us hope that a great MMO will finally be made and I trust AoC to be there.

Child Item