Glorious Alpha Two Testers!

Alpha Two Realms are now unlocked for Phase II testing!

For our initial launch, testing will begin on Friday, December 20, 2024, at 10 AM Pacific and continue uninterrupted until Monday, January 6, 2025, at 10 AM Pacific. After January 6th, we’ll transition to a schedule of five-day-per-week access for the remainder of Phase II.

You can download the game launcher here and we encourage you to join us on our for the most up to date testing news.

In The Shadows - Rogue Discussion

ChaosFactorChaosFactor Member, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
"The rogue is master of opportunity, using skill, positioning, and the environment to dish out frightening amounts of damage. In their downtime, they provide solid utility, helping their friends navigate dangers otherwise unseen."

Assassin, Predator, and Charlatan. These are a few of the Archetypes that a rogue may find himself delving into. But each one of these unique branches rely off of the core class of Rogue. We don't know much yet about the class of Rogue, being that the focus of development so far has gone to our friends the Tank, Mage and Cleric. (3/21/2021)
But from what we do know on the Rogue Community Wiki Page the rogue is quoted with, skill, opportunity, and frightening. These three things to me are certainly core aspects of what makes a rogue, a rogue.

Skill

Rogues are iconic for being a prestigious class, requiring fast button clicks, exact timing, and intelligent placement of abilities. In a game where we will have access to both Tab Targeting (TT) and Action Based (AB) combat, opportunities should arise. Action based combat will represent the skill based, lightning fast style that makes rogue so iconic.

Opportunity

One of the primary discussions surrounding the class of Rogue is their ability to create unique opportunities through class specific interactions with the open world. As Steven has said himself "So it'll be important and relevant for parties to make sure that they have a diversity of archetypes available to them." (In reference to Rogues). Where this has been seen before commonly through the trade of lockpicking, rogues are open to much more opportunities in the world of Verra.

Frightening

Not only are you the blade in the shadow, the lurking power that fuels your passion for RP within the realm of the rogue, but they're iconic in PvP. The Rogue is always the enemy that you see in your nightmares out in the open world. They slip out of the shadows, in the midst of fighting a few mobs, taking advantage of a player's lack of attention. Some may even just let loose of their keyboard as they let the inevitable occur.
These are the cores that create the philosophy of a rogue. It drives how us Rogues roleplay with the world around us, it allows those of us who enjoy using death as a primary gameplay mechanic. Being a rogue means that you can can find your opportunity, strike fear into their hearts as you slip out of the shadows, and use your well trained and precise skills to take the enemy down in a few swift seconds.
____________________________
How we want to fight.
____________________________

You don't build a rogue to mash the same button over and over, you don't play a rogue to leave 3 bleeds on someone and auto attack them while you watch them die. You play a rogue to rip and tear a target apart, through a swift array of pressed keys and perfect timing. You could even play a rogue purely to cause incredible confusion, by slipping in and out of the shadows, or possibly blinding your enemies.

Mobility

Mobility is absolutely key to a rogue kit, whether it is raw movement speed, or a leap through the air, or the ability to slip into the shadows. I personally would even argue that raw mobility is more important than stealth. Stealth as a game mechanic can often be done wrong, playing it like a D&D style explosion of damage as you leave stealth. This is dumb, MMO combat is far too complex to simply explode someone from stealth, and think you can get away with it. Either it's completely overpowered and truly allows oneshots then re-entering stealth, or one failed burst just leaves you in the open battlefield, leaving you to get CC'd and nuked in the middle of the enemy team. Mobility means that you can leap in, deal your damage, and leap out if need be. Rather than having to constantly be bothered by an invisible force lurking around in the open field, you have to keep your eyes LOCKED on the rogue, you have to ensure that you never lose track of them because if they do, the rogue can abuse it, by vaulting into the battlefield to execute a healer, just to backflip back into the ramparts. Not only will this create an effective battle strategy in large scale battles, but allows you to be a haunting spirit of death over anyone who thinks they can escape you in a small scale PvP interaction.

Comat Combos

Rhythm is a MASSIVE mechanic in combat, it creates fluidity, it creates non-repetitive combat, it creates raw, sexy and satisfying reward for skill in the midst of combat. Combos should NOT be some of the stupid stereotypical crap that some MMORPGs fall into. Smacking two different buttons until you get enough stacks to do a lot of damage with one "combo" ability, is like I said: crap. A true combo requires delicate choice of spell combos, delicate choice of when to expend a powerful execution ability when you're confident you're going to finish off your opponent, not that you just built up enough combo points. Something along the lines of Tempo Each ability develops a certain amount of tempo. Tempo stacks up to 8, and increases ability haste. Lower damage spells develop less tempo, and certain abilities cannot be cast until a certain stack of tempo is reached. If a spell is cast at 8 tempo, it is a guaranteed critical strike with an additional 150% damage, allowing for the highest tempo cost spell to be expended to deal massive damage and therefore execute. This means that the player will benefit for coming up with their own personalized and adaptable combat strategy in order to dish out massive damage.

Amor Penetration

Armor penetration, and if it wasn't clear, let me reiterate, Armor. Penetration. This is one of the most incredible and rewarding combat mechanics to ever give to a mobile damaging class. Not only that, but it allows for Rogues to dish on damage on any target they want, without becoming wildly overpowered against squishy classes. Raw damage output leads to the nuking of low health players/mobs. Percentile based armor penetration allows you to not be trampled by a tank, but also not simply dish out infinite damage to low armor/low health targets as shredding 30% of their 60 armor makes far less of a difference then shredding 30% of a tanks 600 armor. (Lets say armor is -1 damage per armor, 20 armor off means 20 more damage per strike. Therefore 200 damage on a target that has less than 10x the health would imply higher damage based off of targets with high resistances over health.) . Not only is this important for PvP content, but during PvE combat, rogues desire to excel on their own. Having armor penetration will allow rogues to fight off powerful mobs on their own, similar to the ability of clerics to sustain themselves against those powerful enemies, mages to kite, or tanks to simply eat stronger attacks.
____________________________
The Rogue's Utility.
____________________________

There have been multiple mentions throughout the years about the utility that the rogue possesses. Concepts such as that mentioned in Steven's AMA in July 2020, where the rogue is capable of opening concealed and important doorways that can lead to different bosses, different loot, and different locations. These kinds of utilities is what really fuels the tabletop style gameplay of a rogue. Being able to crack into unique hallways, break into the backdoors of castles during sieges, destroy unique items that can provide benefits to the battle in a node siege. Although combat and deadly capability is the core of gameplay when it comes to choosing a rogue architype, by no means do I want my architype to be limited to high apm zoomers like me. There are many ways to open up the world of utility for the rogue without being overly simple and boring along the lines of pickpocketing.

Mobility Utility

Something that truly and unendingly peeves me as a high mobility melee player, is walking up to a wall of stone and going.. "Well guess I'll have to walk around this big route, because my badass rogue that does backflips off of walls before stabbing someone in the back apparently CAN'T CLIMB A ROCK!?". This can be solved in very simple ways. Either we have a static mobility ability, such as a vault before a strike down on a target, or simply a passive mobility bonus that allows you to scale structures. In my opinion, static mobility is a much better option. Not only does this create SUPER adaptive and creative movement, as players have much more choice in where they go, but mechanics such as wall scaling can create a massive load of effort from map builders, and can lead to many strange geometry interactions out in the open world. (Things like climbing on the wrong spot in a mushroom, clipping into it, and falling through the world). On top of a static jump, having something like a static AB dash attack can lead to combo'd mobility, allowing to leave no limits on the exploration of the world around you.

In The Shadows

This is truly where stealth becomes an aspect of the rogue, where it truly gives the player a reason to enter and stay in the shadows. Being behind enemy lines is most rewarding OUTSIDE of combat. Mechanics such as siphoning funds or materials from a rival node, or even your own, or being rewarded things such as certificates for collecting information on enemy targets such as caravans is the true application of stealth. Introducing mechanics such as this would create an incredibly immersive and roleplay esq. feeling to everyone who opts into the architype.
____________________________
Spell Propositions.
____________________________

In this section I am going to be throwing up into the air concepts for spells that the Rogue could have in the world of Verra. I of course have no idea how developed these already are, and they could possibly already have a finished set of spells for them, but even if they may not weight heavily on the final decisions of the Rogue spells in Ashes, I want the concepts to be put out there to truly get a grip on how we want our combat to feel. For now I am going to be operating off of the concept of Tempo which I have mentioned previously, in general this is my introduction to the concept of rhythm in concept and can be removed from the spell concepts.

Swift Strike - A core damaging ability, used to begin your tempo. Generating 1 tempo, a Swift Strike, deals (x) damage to a single target.

Wheel of Death - A powerful single target ability that allows you to track a target. Generating 3 tempo, Wheel of Death is a targeted attack that lunges you towards the target, making 3 attacks dealing (x) damage over 1.5 seconds. The rogue follows the target if they move during the 3 strikes. (Archetypes such as Scion (Ranger Mage) would allow you to follow the target even after a blink or dash, flashing you to the target as they move)

Crippling Dash - A static AB dash that does AOE damage in a large rectangle. Generating 2 tempo, In a certain AB direction, the rogue dashes forward, blades flared outwards in either direction. Every target within that area takes (x) damage. This dash can be obstructed by objects.

Piercing Blow - A finishing move, or simply raw damage in a single attack. Generating 5 tempo, on a long cooldown Piercing blow does (2x) damage +(x%) damage based on missing health on a single target. Generating a massive chunk of tempo piercing blow can either be a way to quickly enter fast paced combat, possibly to cast as many mobility spells as you can to get out or deep in to combat. Or develop your combo'ing skills, the drop the enemy to the perfect health total through the use of other spells, then expelling piercing blow at the perfect time to proc maximum tempo and maximum scaling %Missing health.

Bladed Vault - Another addition to the mobility of the rogue, and allowing for fluid navigation of the world. Generating 2 tempo, the rogue drags his blades behind him as he leaps into the air, dealing (x) damage in a static area around and above them. The rogue will linger in the air for .5 seconds at the apex of the leap. This can be obstructed by objects.

Dagger Toss - Having a little bit of range is definitely needed for every class. In addition to this, give the rogue something to do in the air, and not be stuck with nothing to do as they leap, float for a moment then fall. Generating 1 tempo, the rogue whips a spare blade with extreme accuracy through the air, dealing (.5x) damage to a single target on a very short cooldown.

Outside of this, there of course will spells associated with stealth. A base ability to enter stealth, and possibly spell mechanics that allow you to enter stealth after casting certain spells like mobility spells in order to gap close before combat begins. A possible mechanic to enhance the stylized exiting stealth to create a grand entrance of damage into a fight could be the passive Come Death.Come Death is a passive that causes the first ability after leaving stealth to generate double tempo, therefore if you're looking to dish out massive damage when leaving stealth, you could enter with a Piercing Blow, which immediately surpassing the 8 tempo limit, would cause you to get an overpowered crit on a high damage ability, compensating for the lack of % missing health if it's entering combat. Or possibly if you stumble upon a low health target in stealth, casting the Piercing Strike could lead you to get a MASSIVE in stealth, overpowered crit, %health attack, instakilling a low health unsuspecting target.
______________________
Conclusion.
______________________

I could only hope that everyone out there in the community have the same passion for the upcoming game as I do. If there is just 10 people who are passionate enough about their class as I am, I'm confident that we can link hand and hand with the developers to make incredibly meaningful and FUN classes to play in Ashes of Creation.
By all means!! Reply to this post, tell me what you think, call me a moron if you want, or help me develop what might be unfinished thoughts. I love having a conversation, and possibly draw enough attention to the thread that we can get the attention of the Devs, to get a real conversation going about the in-depth development of archetypes. (4/13/2021) We're coming up on the NDA drop of Alpha 1, so it's truly the time to get the wheel rolling on how we want to customize our Ashes experience, the sooner the better for the Intrepid team.

If you got this far.. You're AWESOME! I appreciate your attention deeply, especially if it's that of those who work at the wonderful Intrepid. If you want to start up a conversation with me personally, I am in the Ashes Discord of course and my username is ChaosFactor#6401. Don't be shy.

And as always..
Sincerely,
Chaos
ej8s4cu9gp1n.png

Comments

  • You're a moron.
  • maouwmaouw Member, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    @FutureCultLeader
    Whoa, calm down!
    People are allowed to theory craft.
    I wish I were deep and tragic
  • ChaosFactorChaosFactor Member, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    You're a moron.

    Would you like to give any reason? Or if you're just trolling honestly that's fine too LMAO
    ej8s4cu9gp1n.png
  • You're a moron.

    Would you like to give any reason? Or if you're just trolling honestly that's fine too LMAO

    I mean, you did offer. I like your suggestions though, really neat.

  • daveywaveydaveywavey Member, Alpha Two
    call me a moron if you want

    You just can't give us that opening. There's no way we're not going to pounce on it! Mwahahahahaha!!!

    giphy.gif
    This link may help you: https://ashesofcreation.wiki/


    giphy-downsized-large.gif?cid=b603632fp2svffcmdi83yynpfpexo413mpb1qzxnh3cei0nx&ep=v1_gifs_gifId&rid=giphy-downsized-large.gif&ct=s
  • daveywaveydaveywavey Member, Alpha Two
    maouw wrote: »
    @FutureCultLeader
    Whoa, calm down!
    People are allowed to theory craft.

    It's funny to see how many other people didn't read that far, by how many "Like" this comment! Hahahaha :D

    And yeah, it was way too long for me...!
    This link may help you: https://ashesofcreation.wiki/


    giphy-downsized-large.gif?cid=b603632fp2svffcmdi83yynpfpexo413mpb1qzxnh3cei0nx&ep=v1_gifs_gifId&rid=giphy-downsized-large.gif&ct=s
  • akabearakabear Member, Braver of Worlds, Kickstarter, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    I like roaming rogues but prefer ranger danger!
  • maouwmaouw Member, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    edited April 2021
    daveywavey wrote: »
    maouw wrote: »
    @FutureCultLeader
    Whoa, calm down!
    People are allowed to theory craft.

    It's funny to see how many other people didn't read that far, by how many "Like" this comment! Hahahaha :D

    And yeah, it was way too long for me...!

    giphy.gif
    I wish I were deep and tragic
  • ChaosFactorChaosFactor Member, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    akabear wrote: »
    I like roaming rogues but prefer ranger danger!

    I always think about how the two classes pair well with each other! Both very mobile, good at tracking, and good at collecting information. When I inevitably form a family of those who walk in the shadows, I'll consider adding some rangers to the team ;)
    ej8s4cu9gp1n.png
  • NagashNagash Member, Leader of Men, Kickstarter, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    akabear wrote: »
    I like roaming rogues but prefer ranger danger!

    I always think about how the two classes pair well with each other! Both very mobile, good at tracking, and good at collecting information. When I inevitably form a family of those who walk in the shadows, I'll consider adding some rangers to the team ;)

    I always see rangers like Aragorn a great bowman and scout but also handy with a sword
    nJ0vUSm.gif

    The dead do not squabble as this land’s rulers do. The dead have no desires, petty jealousies or ambitions. A world of the dead is a world at peace
  • ChaosFactorChaosFactor Member, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    Nagash wrote: »
    akabear wrote: »
    I like roaming rogues but prefer ranger danger!

    I always think about how the two classes pair well with each other! Both very mobile, good at tracking, and good at collecting information. When I inevitably form a family of those who walk in the shadows, I'll consider adding some rangers to the team ;)

    I always see rangers like Aragorn a great bowman and scout but also handy with a sword

    Very true! And without limitations of the weapons you can equip based on class, this is definitely going to be an option.
    ej8s4cu9gp1n.png
  • TacualeonTacualeon Member
    edited April 2021
    I agree with almost everything you have said except for armor penetration.

    Eventually Ashes developers will face the dilemma of flat armor penetration Vs % armor penetration or something similar.
    Maybe a different name, but EVENTUALLY whether you want to penetrate low armor or high armor will be a thing and a decision to make.


    I want rogues to have flat penetration. I don't want rogue to have a generic "ignore every type of armor amount" that works against everyone, in every situation.
    Setting a division between flat penetration and % penetration makes interaction in pvp more meaningful and makes the pvp eco-system richer.

    -Rogues (and other squishy high dps classes) ignore flat armor. Best for killing low armored targets.
    -Other type of meelee ignore % armor, best for killing armored target.


    I main tanks and rogues. Rogues should struggle against armored target and shoud reach for their utility spell to work around in those scenarios.
    If rogues can penetrate % armor, I hope is situational.

    Could you duel and kill a tank? Yes, but that should be a challenge because rogue fantasy is killing low armored targets not shredding everything. Rock beat scissors.
  • ChaosFactorChaosFactor Member, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    Tacualeon wrote: »
    I agree with almost everything you have said except for armor penetration.

    Eventually Ashes developers will face the dilemma of flat armor penetration Vs % armor penetration or something similar.
    Maybe a different name, but EVENTUALLY whether you want to penetrate low armor or high armor will be a thing and a decision to make.


    I want rogues to have flat penetration. I don't want rogue to have a generic "ignore every type of armor amount" that works against everyone, in every situation.
    Setting a division between flat penetration and % penetration makes interaction in pvp more meaningful and makes the pvp eco-system richer.

    -Rogues (and other squishy high dps classes) ignore flat armor. Best for killing low armored targets.
    -Other type of meelee ignore % armor, best for killing armored target.


    I main tanks and rogues. Rogues should struggle against armored target and shoud reach for their utility spell to work around in those scenarios.
    If rogues can penetrate % armor, I hope is situational.

    Could you duel and kill a tank? Yes, but that should be a challenge because rogue fantasy is killing low armored targets not shredding everything. Rock beat scissors.

    That's totally fair play. I can see how a flat number can provide for more healthy prevention against certain armor types. Something along the lines of a "mail" armor type where bridled decent armor but low health can lead to rogues literally insta-nuking certain class types.
    In my eyes however, I'm really not a fan of the world of warcraft style tanks that are just regular dps with extra health and no execute spells. Tanks to me should represent literally unkillable walls that rely off of extended fights to win. Therefore the dynamic between tanks and rogues involves careful evaluation of what class is where, and possibly adding some reactive high flat damage reductions, so well timed spells can allow tanks to occasionally outplay rogues.

    Inherently I too am suspicious of Armor Penetration as a stat, in mix/max culture you can VERY quickly lead down the rabbit hole of certain armor types getting COMPLETELY destroyed by rogues and other AP classes.

    I do still however stand by my stat evaluation, that I believe % based pen is really effective at allowing rogues to out fight most players solo, but not instgib the cloth armor wearers.

    I appreciate the in depth response!
    ej8s4cu9gp1n.png
  • I mean Aragorn wasn't actually a rogue in the terms of class that we would use it for this game though. They meant it more that no one knew of his past since he's a few hundred years older than most of the other characters.

    His main skill was definitely in swordmanship with archery being a secondary. He lacked a lot of the skills required though.

    It sounds like they may make the rogue class in this game have high cooldown times with a lot of versatility. I don't see there being a drawback to burst in this game that isn't something like that. As burst is counteractive of the initial design of how long they want the combat to last. I could see them as possibly being a class who goes in and does all of their damage really quickly. Then goes off and does other things while they wait to do it again.
    zZJyoEK.gif

    U.S. East
  • Cold 0ne FTBCold 0ne FTB Member, Alpha One, Adventurer, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    I like alot of the base concepts you have suggested. The need for mobility and developing a combo that rewards skill sounds really good.

    The only thing I would be concerned about is how to ensure that rogues are viable in large scale PvP. Your suggestion allows for a class playstyle that seems suitable at countering long range classes like mages, rangers, clerics, bards and summoners. Somebody that would attack the backline and catch these squishy targets off guard. I really liked the alternative where the gap closer followed the enemy through a blink.
    ZxbhjES.gif

    That is not dead which can eternal lie. And with strange aeons even death may die.
  • I admit I didn't have the patience to read all of that worldbuilding backstory. The proposed mechanics that I found in that text is pretty intriguing and I believe some variation/adaptation of such ideas is going to work itself into the vide variety of the rogue archetype. However atm we have honestly 0 info on the actual mechanical state of game systems when it comes to the rogue archetype.

    Anyway nice worldbuilding ;-)
    “Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil.”

    ― Plato
  • ChaosFactorChaosFactor Member, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    I like alot of the base concepts you have suggested. The need for mobility and developing a combo that rewards skill sounds really good.

    The only thing I would be concerned about is how to ensure that rogues are viable in large scale PvP. Your suggestion allows for a class playstyle that seems suitable at countering long range classes like mages, rangers, clerics, bards and summoners. Somebody that would attack the backline and catch these squishy targets off guard. I really liked the alternative where the gap closer followed the enemy through a blink.

    I appreciate the review and glad you enjoyed some of the concepts. On the point of large scale PvP, I was also curious how it's going to pan out. Theoretically as I said in the post they should be capable of leaping in, executing a target then dipping out. Issue is in a large scale battle often people are buffed or constantly healed enough that it's damn near impossible. I'm not ENTIRELY apposed to Rogue simply being a class that doesn't perform well in massive battles, but of course I'm hoping for some sort of compensation so we can at least take part. Possibly depending on what secondary archetype you select it could feed more into large scale PvP, such as taking ranger would lead to long range, non-intrusive spells.
    ej8s4cu9gp1n.png
  • E_THE_REAL1E_THE_REAL1 Member, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    edited May 2021
    In the context of rock/paper/scissors style matchups. If rogue = scissors, will taking up mage (paper) as your secondary archetype and playing a nightspell, give you armor penetration in the form of magic damage that bypasses armor? I think that would be cool...

  • Cold 0ne FTBCold 0ne FTB Member, Alpha One, Adventurer, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    In the context of rock/paper/scissors style matchups. If rogue = scissors, will taking up mage (paper) as your secondary archetype and playing a nightspell, give you armor penetration in the form of magic damage that bypasses armor? I think that would be cool...

    We have to wait and see. It might. It might also not generate a true paper counter to the rock that is a tank/fighter. It might not get countered as hard, it might also develop a weakness to other rogues or scissors classes but I don't see a version of a class coming out with no true counters.
    ZxbhjES.gif

    That is not dead which can eternal lie. And with strange aeons even death may die.
  • DygzDygz Member, Braver of Worlds, Kickstarter, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    Skill

    Rogues are iconic for being a prestigious class, requiring fast button clicks, exact timing, and intelligent placement of abilities. In a game where we will have access to both Tab Targeting (TT) and Action Based (AB) combat, opportunities should arise. Action based combat will represent the skill based, lightning fast style that makes rogue so iconic.
    Skill really refers to character skill; not player skill.
    In D&D, Rogues can choose the highest number of skills - it's about variety of skills, like Diplomacy, Bluff, Climbing, Decipher Languages and Disarm Traps.
    When that is reflected in CRPGS, it usually includes Stealth, Pick Pocketing, Set Traps, Disarm Traps, etc.
    Flanking typically boosts Backstab/Crit damage.
  • DygzDygz Member, Braver of Worlds, Kickstarter, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    In the context of rock/paper/scissors style matchups. If rogue = scissors, will taking up mage (paper) as your secondary archetype and playing a nightspell, give you armor penetration in the form of magic damage that bypasses armor? I think that would be cool...
    rock/paper/scissors:
    Rogue = melee DPS
    Mage = ranged DPS
    Different types of paper.

    Rock/Paper/Scissors is typically Tank/Mage (or Rogue)/Cleric.
  • To me a "rogue" should be able to go anywhere. Not with some magical vaulting jump, but in a quiet and stealthy way. Want to get into a castle? A mage might fly, and tank might headbutt the wall until one of them falls over, but rogue will quietly climb the wall using spikes or a grappling hook.
    Rogues are meant to be cunning, intelligent, fast and dextrous. This should not only be apparent in their combat, but also in their utility. They sneak, they pickpocket, they quietly blend in with their surroundings. Whether it be an assassin sneaking through the shadows, a Charlton disguising himself to go unnoticed as an npc, or a predator lying in wait for his quarry to pass by before taking them out with a single arrow as they stand unable to move in the trap he laid 5 minutes ago, rogues should never be "flashy" but ALWAYS low key.

    Loki
  • ChaosFactorChaosFactor Member, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    In the context of rock/paper/scissors style matchups. If rogue = scissors, will taking up mage (paper) as your secondary archetype and playing a nightspell, give you armor penetration in the form of magic damage that bypasses armor? I think that would be cool...

    I think that's a pretty solid idea. Just in general if a class is fundamentally based in high DPS on every armor type, it may be a super interesting adaptation that you can sub-archetype into different damage types. This could also be very interesting for PvE style content as you could have rogues designated as certain damage types. Perhaps a certain boss has incredibly high "Light Resistance" and the rogue can shred that in order to buff the overall player damage.

    Thanks for the feedback!
    ej8s4cu9gp1n.png
  • ChaosFactorChaosFactor Member, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    Dygz wrote: »
    Skill

    Rogues are iconic for being a prestigious class, requiring fast button clicks, exact timing, and intelligent placement of abilities. In a game where we will have access to both Tab Targeting (TT) and Action Based (AB) combat, opportunities should arise. Action based combat will represent the skill based, lightning fast style that makes rogue so iconic.
    Skill really refers to character skill; not player skill.
    In D&D, Rogues can choose the highest number of skills - it's about variety of skills, like Diplomacy, Bluff, Climbing, Decipher Languages and Disarm Traps.
    When that is reflected in CRPGS, it usually includes Stealth, Pick Pocketing, Set Traps, Disarm Traps, etc.
    Flanking typically boosts Backstab/Crit damage.

    I do 100% agree with you in the sense that skillfulness is the most common reflection of skills in the actual gameplay and spells of Rogues in RPGs, notably D&D. However part of the reason of my discussion here is that the fantasy of rogues that are often missed out on is that idea where the rogue with dual daggers can spin, dodge, block, slip in and out of stealth and be an example of dominance through dexterity and quick reaction times.

    I think one of the examples of this type of gameplay that I'm talking about is actually Guild Wars 2. Although I'm not truly a fan of the full game itself, the class design is amazing and I think their depiction of a rogue type of class in "Thief" is incredibly satisfying.

    Thanks for the feedback!
    ej8s4cu9gp1n.png
  • DygzDygz Member, Braver of Worlds, Kickstarter, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    Yeah that's quick reaction times reflective of high Dex. I think that's different than skill.
    Perfect clarification. Thanks!
  • ChaosFactorChaosFactor Member, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    LowQuey wrote: »
    To me a "rogue" should be able to go anywhere. Not with some magical vaulting jump, but in a quiet and stealthy way. Want to get into a castle? A mage might fly, and tank might headbutt the wall until one of them falls over, but rogue will quietly climb the wall using spikes or a grappling hook.
    Rogues are meant to be cunning, intelligent, fast and dextrous. This should not only be apparent in their combat, but also in their utility. They sneak, they pickpocket, they quietly blend in with their surroundings. Whether it be an assassin sneaking through the shadows, a Charlton disguising himself to go unnoticed as an npc, or a predator lying in wait for his quarry to pass by before taking them out with a single arrow as they stand unable to move in the trap he laid 5 minutes ago, rogues should never be "flashy" but ALWAYS low key.

    Loki

    I'm a big fan of a fellow forum writer that enjoys using some artistic writing in the posts. I do agree fully with your depiction of the rogue, and that is how I always imagine my rogues when playing and writing them in my campaigns. HOWEVER, I believe generally the depiction of classes and magic in the game under the guise of the Intrepid team's design (Refer to tank), generally all abilities in the game have a magical flare to them. In my head when designing this, I do my best to reflect the spell design accordingly to what we have already seen in the alpha stages of the game. Hopefully that concept is apparent in the original post.

    Fortunately! Which I believe I had mentioned in the original post, (I don't remember everything it's been a long time lol) In the teaser video for Rangers a LONG time ago they had mentioned the application of wall scaling and flanking in castles/nodes, so your concept of grappling should be depicted within the game. I'm hoping for it as well.

    Thanks for the feedback!
    ej8s4cu9gp1n.png
  • Nightspell for life! Who’s with me? Anyone? Anyone at all?



    Your ideas are cool. I loved reading through this. What brought me to loving rogue are the core dashes/ blinks and invisibility/ camouflage. Adding with mage would make my life a whole lot better cause I like both classes. To me a rogue as probably stated before (idk) waits in the darkness or invisibility waiting for a crucial moment to strike. Always lurking ready to pounce on a farmer. Overall love the ideas.

    Nightspell for life!✊
  • ChaosFactorChaosFactor Member, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    Mrhubbard wrote: »
    Nightspell for life! Who’s with me? Anyone? Anyone at all?



    Your ideas are cool. I loved reading through this. What brought me to loving rogue are the core dashes/ blinks and invisibility/ camouflage. Adding with mage would make my life a whole lot better cause I like both classes. To me a rogue as probably stated before (idk) waits in the darkness or invisibility waiting for a crucial moment to strike. Always lurking ready to pounce on a farmer. Overall love the ideas.

    Nightspell for life!✊

    I apologize for my incredibly slow response but thank you for reading! I most CERTAINLY can see the addiction in the amount of movement and stealth interactions that can some with being a nightspell. I personally have never been a mage player and probably never will, but maybe one day I'll poke you for advice if I decide to make a post on the other rogue architypes ;)
    ej8s4cu9gp1n.png
Sign In or Register to comment.