Falkath wrote: » For sure killing them is the best way to stop them, but corruption isn't something you'll want to stack just for the sake of killing a bot over and over
akabear wrote: » Used to be 100% against bots, but after NW base material supply was kept in check by bots now on the fence!
Dogemon wrote: » paid and volunteer gms monitoring the world
Ironhope wrote: » Dogemon wrote: » paid and volunteer gms monitoring the world I'm far from an expert on the matter but haven't virtually all these people been fired by Blizzard at one point? I do remember a huge scandal regarding this and the utter inability to find any GM a couple of years ago when I played Classic WoW. I sincerely doubt that having a couple of people per server just running around hunting bots isn't enough to keep them in check. At one point it just gets financially unfeasible for the botter to keep paying for new accounts.
Dogemon wrote: » but I believe blizzard have had over 10 years of experience trying to deal with RMTers and bots, so they must know something we don't
Ironhope wrote: » Dogemon wrote: » but I believe blizzard have had over 10 years of experience trying to deal with RMTers and bots, so they must know something we don't I sincerely doubt that. The decission to fire the live service squad was made almost certainly by the finance-management branch of the company, by people who realistically never played the game in their life and couldn't describe a raid to save their said life. The sad reality is that Blizzard degenerated into an absolute, souless cash grab, with 100% of the decision power coming from people 3+ levels removed from the game designers/moderators. I am no game developer and I have never been GM in any game in my life but I sincerely doubt the problem can't be solved by having a few people, even volunters running around banning bots. If they ban somebody abusively, said person can be unbanned by a proper admin and if the volunteer is abusive his rights can be revoked. I would do that for fun, they wouldn't even have to pay me. Although I probably wouldn't be very productive because I will realistically end up playing like 12 hours a week at most.
Dogemon wrote: » I sincerely doubt they did that because it was costing them money,
Dogemon wrote: » as you said there was no shortage of janny volunteers like you willing to work for free
Dogemon wrote: » I also sincerely doubt they fired them just because they wanted to support botting just to screw with the players
novercalis wrote: » man, I would pay to play as a GM and hunt RMTers, cheaters and botters down That in itself is a game I am all for.
Arya_Yeshe wrote: » The simple fact that you can run only one instance of the game cuts a lot of botting out