Greetings, glorious testers!

Check out Alpha Two Announcements here to see the latest news on Alpha Two.
Check out general Announcements here to see the latest news on Ashes of Creation & Intrepid Studios.

To get the quickest updates regarding Alpha Two, connect your Discord and Intrepid accounts here.

Travel Times

nanfoodlenanfoodle Member, Founder, Kickstarter, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
edited November 7 in General Discussion
I get mounts will get faster and add new skills to help like gliding. Spending 30-45 min to travel across a map, does not feel great. We did this a few times now and once the team broke up just as we got there and had to travel another 30 min to another team that was so badly run, I was earning EXP debt faster then anything. We need faster travel systems, even buying fast horses that are one time rides to different hubs, like DAoC that you could jump off anywhere on the path. Cart systems, or just make the low level mount go faster.
«1

Comments

  • AlmostDeadAlmostDead Member, Alpha Two
    And this is within 1 biome. Just imagine what this will be like when it's expanded to 2 continents and 100 nodes. It will take an entire evening to get to where you want to go.

    I like the idea of severely restricted fast travel, truly I do. But the current situation doesn't seem practical. I joined a group farming Church of 7 when I was in Miraleth, and it took me like 15-20 minutes and one death (damn wolves) to get there. I wasn't attuned to a nearby emberspring, so had to basically start my journey again.

    Needs to be re-thought, at least a little.
  • iARNiARN Member, Alpha Two
    edited November 4
    AlmostDead wrote: »
    And this is within 1 biome. Just imagine what this will be like when it's expanded to 2 continents and 100 nodes. It will take an entire evening to get to where you want to go.

    I like the idea of severely restricted fast travel, truly I do. But the current situation doesn't seem practical. I joined a group farming Church of 7 when I was in Miraleth, and it took me like 15-20 minutes and one death (damn wolves) to get there. I wasn't attuned to a nearby emberspring, so had to basically start my journey again.

    Needs to be re-thought, at least a little.

    Yeah, man. Like right now, for a light taste of the map, it's 55 square kilometers. The Witcher 3 is 136km/2 World of Warcraft is 207km/2. This map is a third or a quarter of those huge ass games... for a teaser! That is honestly hilarious, and awesome.

    That said, I don't mind the travel time as it is currently, but unless other options are added once the entire map is available, or unless sailing is really fast, then yeah, i could see a lot of problems arising from travel time being too long.

    Unless they're going for an actual world/continent feel. Node conflicts will be localized, politics will be localized, and threats from afar will likely be less of a concern because of logistics and manpower concerns. That said, if you want to go outside of that familiar sphere, it will be a crazy journey, and the culture where you go may be very different.

    My speculation sounds enticing in a fantasy sort of way. I'm not sure how it would survive against reality.
  • DreohDreoh Member, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    nanfoodle wrote: »
    I get mounts will get faster and add new skills to help like gliding. Spending 30-45 min to travel across a map, does not feel great. We did this a few times now and once the team broke up just as we got there and had to travel another 30 min to another team that was so badly run, I was earning EXP debt faster then anything. We need faster travel systems, even buying fast horses that are one time rides to different hubs, like DAoC that you could jump off anywhere on the path. Cart systems, or just make the low level mount go faster.

    No you dont.

    I'll copy paste the comment I made in a similar thread.

    Players will ALWAYS be unhappy with the speed of travel and ENDLESSLY clamour for faster transportation.

    It's ridiculous, short-sighted, selfish behavior.

    Don't fight to eliminate content, fight to make that content more fun.
    Don't enjoy travel? Well come up with ideas on how to make travel more fun. Don't argue that travel should be removed.

    The people who argue for mounts, for faster mounts, for flying mounts.. these people are the same people who eventually become the people who shout that, "there's no content in this game"
    They are the reason we ended up with Dalaran in WoW, with it's portals to every region in the game. Everyone just hearthing to Dalaran and portaling wherever they want to go, then flying straight to the destination.
    Retail WoW is a hub-game, like Monster Hunter or Destiny. You hang out in the hub, get teleported or teleport to your destination, do the content, then teleport back. That's not an open world social sandbox mmo.
    They are the reason we ended up with the LFG auto-dungeon-party system that teleports you to the dungeon instead of having to interact with the community and journey to the dungeon to do it.

    These people are the reason why classic WoW was so very much requested.

    These are the people who endlessly tormented the New World devs and community complaining about having to travel everywhere and "needing" mounts.

    When the world is made based on a speed of travel, and then you increase that speed, the world and content becomes smaller and more trivial.

    These people are the reason why Ashes is a breath of fresh air, with it avoiding these anti-social, anti-immersion systems.

    Inconvenience is gameplay.


  • nanfoodlenanfoodle Member, Founder, Kickstarter, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    Dreoh wrote: »
    nanfoodle wrote: »
    I get mounts will get faster and add new skills to help like gliding. Spending 30-45 min to travel across a map, does not feel great. We did this a few times now and once the team broke up just as we got there and had to travel another 30 min to another team that was so badly run, I was earning EXP debt faster then anything. We need faster travel systems, even buying fast horses that are one time rides to different hubs, like DAoC that you could jump off anywhere on the path. Cart systems, or just make the low level mount go faster.

    No you dont.

    I'll copy paste the comment I made in a similar thread.

    Players will ALWAYS be unhappy with the speed of travel and ENDLESSLY clamour for faster transportation.

    It's ridiculous, short-sighted, selfish behavior.

    Don't fight to eliminate content, fight to make that content more fun.
    Don't enjoy travel? Well come up with ideas on how to make travel more fun. Don't argue that travel should be removed.

    The people who argue for mounts, for faster mounts, for flying mounts.. these people are the same people who eventually become the people who shout that, "there's no content in this game"
    They are the reason we ended up with Dalaran in WoW, with it's portals to every region in the game. Everyone just hearthing to Dalaran and portaling wherever they want to go, then flying straight to the destination.
    Retail WoW is a hub-game, like Monster Hunter or Destiny. You hang out in the hub, get teleported or teleport to your destination, do the content, then teleport back. That's not an open world social sandbox mmo.
    They are the reason we ended up with the LFG auto-dungeon-party system that teleports you to the dungeon instead of having to interact with the community and journey to the dungeon to do it.

    These people are the reason why classic WoW was so very much requested.

    These are the people who endlessly tormented the New World devs and community complaining about having to travel everywhere and "needing" mounts.

    When the world is made based on a speed of travel, and then you increase that speed, the world and content becomes smaller and more trivial.

    These people are the reason why Ashes is a breath of fresh air, with it avoiding these anti-social, anti-immersion systems.

    Inconvenience is gameplay.


    I'm here for the old school MMO as well but the travel time s out of wack with Ashes. This is not the breath of fresh air you are calling it. Even old school MMO had limited ways to get places faster. Like DAoC horses you could pay to travel faster. I have traveled from one end of the A2 map to the other. I spent about 4hr doing just that.

    The problem is compounded, as camps are very far appart with very little in between. If every 15 to 20 min you had a POI to play at. Sure the speed would be fine. It's just not. Need to check 3 camps for a team and that's an evening of game play for a casual. That won't fly.
  • iARNiARN Member, Alpha Two
    edited November 4
    nanfoodle wrote: »
    Dreoh wrote: »
    nanfoodle wrote: »
    I get mounts will get faster and add new skills to help like gliding. Spending 30-45 min to travel across a map, does not feel great. We did this a few times now and once the team broke up just as we got there and had to travel another 30 min to another team that was so badly run, I was earning EXP debt faster then anything. We need faster travel systems, even buying fast horses that are one time rides to different hubs, like DAoC that you could jump off anywhere on the path. Cart systems, or just make the low level mount go faster.

    No you dont.

    I'll copy paste the comment I made in a similar thread.

    Players will ALWAYS be unhappy with the speed of travel and ENDLESSLY clamour for faster transportation.

    It's ridiculous, short-sighted, selfish behavior.

    Don't fight to eliminate content, fight to make that content more fun.
    Don't enjoy travel? Well come up with ideas on how to make travel more fun. Don't argue that travel should be removed.

    The people who argue for mounts, for faster mounts, for flying mounts.. these people are the same people who eventually become the people who shout that, "there's no content in this game"
    They are the reason we ended up with Dalaran in WoW, with it's portals to every region in the game. Everyone just hearthing to Dalaran and portaling wherever they want to go, then flying straight to the destination.
    Retail WoW is a hub-game, like Monster Hunter or Destiny. You hang out in the hub, get teleported or teleport to your destination, do the content, then teleport back. That's not an open world social sandbox mmo.
    They are the reason we ended up with the LFG auto-dungeon-party system that teleports you to the dungeon instead of having to interact with the community and journey to the dungeon to do it.

    These people are the reason why classic WoW was so very much requested.

    These are the people who endlessly tormented the New World devs and community complaining about having to travel everywhere and "needing" mounts.

    When the world is made based on a speed of travel, and then you increase that speed, the world and content becomes smaller and more trivial.

    These people are the reason why Ashes is a breath of fresh air, with it avoiding these anti-social, anti-immersion systems.

    Inconvenience is gameplay.


    I'm here for the old school MMO as well but the travel time s out of wack with Ashes. This is not the breath of fresh air you are calling it. Even old school MMO had limited ways to get places faster. Like DAoC horses you could pay to travel faster. I have traveled from one end of the A2 map to the other. I spent about 4hr doing just that.

    The problem is compounded, as camps are very far appart with very little in between. If every 15 to 20 min you had a POI to play at. Sure the speed would be fine. It's just not. Need to check 3 camps for a team and that's an evening of game play for a casual. That won't fly.

    I rode from the western node to the heartwood tree in 15-20 minutes using the road. Not even a straight line! That's from the edge of the map to the center. There is no way it took you 4 hours to get from one end to the other unless you were stopping along the way.
  • nanfoodlenanfoodle Member, Founder, Kickstarter, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    iARN wrote: »
    nanfoodle wrote: »
    Dreoh wrote: »
    nanfoodle wrote: »
    I get mounts will get faster and add new skills to help like gliding. Spending 30-45 min to travel across a map, does not feel great. We did this a few times now and once the team broke up just as we got there and had to travel another 30 min to another team that was so badly run, I was earning EXP debt faster then anything. We need faster travel systems, even buying fast horses that are one time rides to different hubs, like DAoC that you could jump off anywhere on the path. Cart systems, or just make the low level mount go faster.

    No you dont.

    I'll copy paste the comment I made in a similar thread.

    Players will ALWAYS be unhappy with the speed of travel and ENDLESSLY clamour for faster transportation.

    It's ridiculous, short-sighted, selfish behavior.

    Don't fight to eliminate content, fight to make that content more fun.
    Don't enjoy travel? Well come up with ideas on how to make travel more fun. Don't argue that travel should be removed.

    The people who argue for mounts, for faster mounts, for flying mounts.. these people are the same people who eventually become the people who shout that, "there's no content in this game"
    They are the reason we ended up with Dalaran in WoW, with it's portals to every region in the game. Everyone just hearthing to Dalaran and portaling wherever they want to go, then flying straight to the destination.
    Retail WoW is a hub-game, like Monster Hunter or Destiny. You hang out in the hub, get teleported or teleport to your destination, do the content, then teleport back. That's not an open world social sandbox mmo.
    They are the reason we ended up with the LFG auto-dungeon-party system that teleports you to the dungeon instead of having to interact with the community and journey to the dungeon to do it.

    These people are the reason why classic WoW was so very much requested.

    These are the people who endlessly tormented the New World devs and community complaining about having to travel everywhere and "needing" mounts.

    When the world is made based on a speed of travel, and then you increase that speed, the world and content becomes smaller and more trivial.

    These people are the reason why Ashes is a breath of fresh air, with it avoiding these anti-social, anti-immersion systems.

    Inconvenience is gameplay.


    I'm here for the old school MMO as well but the travel time s out of wack with Ashes. This is not the breath of fresh air you are calling it. Even old school MMO had limited ways to get places faster. Like DAoC horses you could pay to travel faster. I have traveled from one end of the A2 map to the other. I spent about 4hr doing just that.

    The problem is compounded, as camps are very far appart with very little in between. If every 15 to 20 min you had a POI to play at. Sure the speed would be fine. It's just not. Need to check 3 camps for a team and that's an evening of game play for a casual. That won't fly.

    I rode from the western node to the heartwood tree in 15-20 minutes using the road. Not even a straight line! That's from the edge of the map to the center. There is no way it took you 4 hours to get from one end to the other unless you were stopping along the way.

    I walked acccross every corner to do that. It's what I did on the spot test two weeks ago. Have you even been to the big red wall that stops you from traveling further? I have.
  • novercalisnovercalis Member, Founder, Kickstarter, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    I love it. makes the world feels even LARGER and you get to appreciate everything around you.

    Once Caravan starts - the risk of travel time and the reward is the only thing I am worried. I hope it hits the right spot (reward) for long journeys.

    People are impatient and MMORPG isn't suited for the 2hr gamers either. This may not be the game for you. Fuck fast movement, fast travel.

    Everquest - From Halas to Gnome City was like 2.5hr. If you missed the boat to get to the 2nd continent, you had to wait 40 min for it to come back!

    Eventually, just like EQ, AoC will have spell casters create portals to some locations to assist with travel and I am okay with that, as long as those portals are very limited.

    Please don't change Ashes. I love this long journey. Just need more danger while traveling.
    {UPK} United Player Killer - All your loot belongs to us.
  • okolookolo Member, Braver of Worlds, Kickstarter, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    edited November 5
    I disagree. I feel that with the size of the world, the time it takes to travel it will lead to a better population spread. If X grinding spot is technically the best, but takes 25 minutes to travel to vs a couple slightly less "good" spots only 5-10 minutes travel from where your group currently is, then the majority of players will choose the more convenient option(s).

    And if a group decides they are going to make the longer trek, only to find it's already over-populated, then it seems like that's a scenario they are trying to promote as a PVP "opportunity." I'm personally less in love with that idea, but I get it.
  • nanfoodlenanfoodle Member, Founder, Kickstarter, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    novercalis wrote: »
    I love it. makes the world feels even LARGER and you get to appreciate everything around you.

    Once Caravan starts - the risk of travel time and the reward is the only thing I am worried. I hope it hits the right spot (reward) for long journeys.

    People are impatient and MMORPG isn't suited for the 2hr gamers either. This may not be the game for you. Fuck fast movement, fast travel.

    Everquest - From Halas to Gnome City was like 2.5hr. If you missed the boat to get to the 2nd continent, you had to wait 40 min for it to come back!

    Eventually, just like EQ, AoC will have spell casters create portals to some locations to assist with travel and I am okay with that, as long as those portals are very limited.

    Please don't change Ashes. I love this long journey. Just need more danger while traveling.

    This game will not make it without casuals.
  • DreohDreoh Member, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    nanfoodle wrote: »
    Dreoh wrote: »
    nanfoodle wrote: »
    I get mounts will get faster and add new skills to help like gliding. Spending 30-45 min to travel across a map, does not feel great. We did this a few times now and once the team broke up just as we got there and had to travel another 30 min to another team that was so badly run, I was earning EXP debt faster then anything. We need faster travel systems, even buying fast horses that are one time rides to different hubs, like DAoC that you could jump off anywhere on the path. Cart systems, or just make the low level mount go faster.

    No you dont.

    I'll copy paste the comment I made in a similar thread.

    Players will ALWAYS be unhappy with the speed of travel and ENDLESSLY clamour for faster transportation.

    It's ridiculous, short-sighted, selfish behavior.

    Don't fight to eliminate content, fight to make that content more fun.
    Don't enjoy travel? Well come up with ideas on how to make travel more fun. Don't argue that travel should be removed.

    The people who argue for mounts, for faster mounts, for flying mounts.. these people are the same people who eventually become the people who shout that, "there's no content in this game"
    They are the reason we ended up with Dalaran in WoW, with it's portals to every region in the game. Everyone just hearthing to Dalaran and portaling wherever they want to go, then flying straight to the destination.
    Retail WoW is a hub-game, like Monster Hunter or Destiny. You hang out in the hub, get teleported or teleport to your destination, do the content, then teleport back. That's not an open world social sandbox mmo.
    They are the reason we ended up with the LFG auto-dungeon-party system that teleports you to the dungeon instead of having to interact with the community and journey to the dungeon to do it.

    These people are the reason why classic WoW was so very much requested.

    These are the people who endlessly tormented the New World devs and community complaining about having to travel everywhere and "needing" mounts.

    When the world is made based on a speed of travel, and then you increase that speed, the world and content becomes smaller and more trivial.

    These people are the reason why Ashes is a breath of fresh air, with it avoiding these anti-social, anti-immersion systems.

    Inconvenience is gameplay.


    I'm here for the old school MMO as well but the travel time s out of wack with Ashes. This is not the breath of fresh air you are calling it. Even old school MMO had limited ways to get places faster. Like DAoC horses you could pay to travel faster. I have traveled from one end of the A2 map to the other. I spent about 4hr doing just that.

    The problem is compounded, as camps are very far appart with very little in between. If every 15 to 20 min you had a POI to play at. Sure the speed would be fine. It's just not. Need to check 3 camps for a team and that's an evening of game play for a casual. That won't fly.

    I understand why you think that, but it's always been stated and a intended design that citizens in a node on one side of the world might never see a node on the other side (except for Max tier science nodes allowing fast travel)

    That's why they actually tripled the intended game map size a year ago or two

    You are coming in to the game with a false notion that you are going to see all the content. Unless you nolife the game and/or play as a traveling merchant, you likely aren't.

    It's why nodes investing into better roads, caravanseries, and building ports along the ocean is such a big deal, and they wouldn't be a big deal if travel was easy.

    They've already stated the intention is for every node to have plentiful content around it, furthered by their regional world storylines that actually affect the region.

    You are conditioned by previous games to expect certain things. Ashes, again, is a fresh air because they're trying to break the stale mould.
  • nanfoodlenanfoodle Member, Founder, Kickstarter, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    Dreoh wrote: »
    nanfoodle wrote: »
    Dreoh wrote: »
    nanfoodle wrote: »
    I get mounts will get faster and add new skills to help like gliding. Spending 30-45 min to travel across a map, does not feel great. We did this a few times now and once the team broke up just as we got there and had to travel another 30 min to another team that was so badly run, I was earning EXP debt faster then anything. We need faster travel systems, even buying fast horses that are one time rides to different hubs, like DAoC that you could jump off anywhere on the path. Cart systems, or just make the low level mount go faster.

    No you dont.

    I'll copy paste the comment I made in a similar thread.

    Players will ALWAYS be unhappy with the speed of travel and ENDLESSLY clamour for faster transportation.

    It's ridiculous, short-sighted, selfish behavior.

    Don't fight to eliminate content, fight to make that content more fun.
    Don't enjoy travel? Well come up with ideas on how to make travel more fun. Don't argue that travel should be removed.

    The people who argue for mounts, for faster mounts, for flying mounts.. these people are the same people who eventually become the people who shout that, "there's no content in this game"
    They are the reason we ended up with Dalaran in WoW, with it's portals to every region in the game. Everyone just hearthing to Dalaran and portaling wherever they want to go, then flying straight to the destination.
    Retail WoW is a hub-game, like Monster Hunter or Destiny. You hang out in the hub, get teleported or teleport to your destination, do the content, then teleport back. That's not an open world social sandbox mmo.
    They are the reason we ended up with the LFG auto-dungeon-party system that teleports you to the dungeon instead of having to interact with the community and journey to the dungeon to do it.

    These people are the reason why classic WoW was so very much requested.

    These are the people who endlessly tormented the New World devs and community complaining about having to travel everywhere and "needing" mounts.

    When the world is made based on a speed of travel, and then you increase that speed, the world and content becomes smaller and more trivial.

    These people are the reason why Ashes is a breath of fresh air, with it avoiding these anti-social, anti-immersion systems.

    Inconvenience is gameplay.


    I'm here for the old school MMO as well but the travel time s out of wack with Ashes. This is not the breath of fresh air you are calling it. Even old school MMO had limited ways to get places faster. Like DAoC horses you could pay to travel faster. I have traveled from one end of the A2 map to the other. I spent about 4hr doing just that.

    The problem is compounded, as camps are very far appart with very little in between. If every 15 to 20 min you had a POI to play at. Sure the speed would be fine. It's just not. Need to check 3 camps for a team and that's an evening of game play for a casual. That won't fly.

    I understand why you think that, but it's always been stated and a intended design that citizens in a node on one side of the world might never see a node on the other side (except for Max tier science nodes allowing fast travel)

    That's why they actually tripled the intended game map size a year ago or two

    You are coming in to the game with a false notion that you are going to see all the content. Unless you nolife the game and/or play as a traveling merchant, you likely aren't.

    It's why nodes investing into better roads, caravanseries, and building ports along the ocean is such a big deal, and they wouldn't be a big deal if travel was easy.

    They've already stated the intention is for every node to have plentiful content around it, furthered by their regional world storylines that actually affect the region.

    You are conditioned by previous games to expect certain things. Ashes, again, is a fresh air because they're trying to break the stale mould.

    Steven has already talked about air ships, portals between science nodes, flight paths between nodes and family summoning. Asking for fast horse routes are not outside the current design. Or faster mounts.
  • novercalisnovercalis Member, Founder, Kickstarter, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    edited November 5
    nanfoodle wrote: »
    novercalis wrote: »
    I love it. makes the world feels even LARGER and you get to appreciate everything around you.

    Once Caravan starts - the risk of travel time and the reward is the only thing I am worried. I hope it hits the right spot (reward) for long journeys.

    People are impatient and MMORPG isn't suited for the 2hr gamers either. This may not be the game for you. Fuck fast movement, fast travel.

    Everquest - From Halas to Gnome City was like 2.5hr. If you missed the boat to get to the 2nd continent, you had to wait 40 min for it to come back!

    Eventually, just like EQ, AoC will have spell casters create portals to some locations to assist with travel and I am okay with that, as long as those portals are very limited.

    Please don't change Ashes. I love this long journey. Just need more danger while traveling.

    This game will not make it without casuals.


    Steven has been very open about this game not being for casual or for the masses. They are not seeking to beat WoW or be a WoW killer or have the most userbase. They have been very transparent of that fact throughout the years. He has stated he is fine this game being a niche game for a niche audience.

    There is going to be a massive rude awakening for a lot of gamers.
    {UPK} United Player Killer - All your loot belongs to us.
  • nanfoodlenanfoodle Member, Founder, Kickstarter, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    edited November 5
    novercalis wrote: »
    nanfoodle wrote: »
    novercalis wrote: »
    I love it. makes the world feels even LARGER and you get to appreciate everything around you.

    Once Caravan starts - the risk of travel time and the reward is the only thing I am worried. I hope it hits the right spot (reward) for long journeys.

    People are impatient and MMORPG isn't suited for the 2hr gamers either. This may not be the game for you. Fuck fast movement, fast travel.

    Everquest - From Halas to Gnome City was like 2.5hr. If you missed the boat to get to the 2nd continent, you had to wait 40 min for it to come back!

    Eventually, just like EQ, AoC will have spell casters create portals to some locations to assist with travel and I am okay with that, as long as those portals are very limited.

    Please don't change Ashes. I love this long journey. Just need more danger while traveling.

    This game will not make it without casuals.


    Steven has been very open about this game not being for casual or for the massive. They are not seeking to beat WoW or be a WoW killer or have the most userbase. They have been very transparent of that fact throughout the years. He has stated he is fine this game being a niche game for a niche audience.

    There is going to be a massive rude awakening for a lot of gamers.

    Steven has been clear that this game is also for casuels. No MMO can make it without them. What he said this game will not be for everyone. The norm about 70-80% of a MMOs population is casual.
  • KalnazzarKalnazzar Member, Braver of Worlds, Kickstarter, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    Fast Travel will be available when there is
    Dreoh wrote: »
    nanfoodle wrote: »
    I get mounts will get faster and add new skills to help like gliding. Spending 30-45 min to travel across a map, does not feel great. We did this a few times now and once the team broke up just as we got there and had to travel another 30 min to another team that was so badly run, I was earning EXP debt faster then anything. We need faster travel systems, even buying fast horses that are one time rides to different hubs, like DAoC that you could jump off anywhere on the path. Cart systems, or just make the low level mount go faster.

    No you dont.

    I'll copy paste the comment I made in a similar thread.

    Players will ALWAYS be unhappy with the speed of travel and ENDLESSLY clamour for faster transportation.

    It's ridiculous, short-sighted, selfish behavior.

    Don't fight to eliminate content, fight to make that content more fun.
    Don't enjoy travel? Well come up with ideas on how to make travel more fun. Don't argue that travel should be removed.

    The people who argue for mounts, for faster mounts, for flying mounts.. these people are the same people who eventually become the people who shout that, "there's no content in this game"
    They are the reason we ended up with Dalaran in WoW, with it's portals to every region in the game. Everyone just hearthing to Dalaran and portaling wherever they want to go, then flying straight to the destination.
    Retail WoW is a hub-game, like Monster Hunter or Destiny. You hang out in the hub, get teleported or teleport to your destination, do the content, then teleport back. That's not an open world social sandbox mmo.
    They are the reason we ended up with the LFG auto-dungeon-party system that teleports you to the dungeon instead of having to interact with the community and journey to the dungeon to do it.

    These people are the reason why classic WoW was so very much requested.

    These are the people who endlessly tormented the New World devs and community complaining about having to travel everywhere and "needing" mounts.

    When the world is made based on a speed of travel, and then you increase that speed, the world and content becomes smaller and more trivial.

    These people are the reason why Ashes is a breath of fresh air, with it avoiding these anti-social, anti-immersion systems.

    Inconvenience is gameplay.


    You nailed it—the instant travel systems in other MMOs, like WoW’s flying, have diminished the sense of a vast world ready for exploration. Players asked for faster travel for years, only to later say the game no longer feels like an expansive world with magic and mystery. In Ashes of Creation, I want fast travel to remain limited, allowing players to experience the full journey instead of skipping to the end.

    I’m fully on board with what Ashes already has planned for academic nodes reaching Metropolis stage, where there’s a carefully thought-out system for travel within their vassal networks, even across seas. Airships connecting scientific metropolises will help players move between nodes without undercutting the journey itself. However, it’s essential that this travel isn’t instantaneous—nothing in the game should teleport players to a destination in the blink of an eye.

    Imagine watching your journey unfold from the airship’s deck, getting to see the world of Verra pass by in real time. This setup would provide efficient travel for those aligned with scientific metropolises while keeping them connected to the world. Being able to look out over forests, mountains, and seas below would add to the feeling of travel, preserving the sense of distance and immersion that Ashes of Creation has emphasized.

    I’d also like to see some wagon or carriage travel on land to provide quicker node-to-node travel along established roads without making it instant. Even for personal transportation options like mounts, a stamina bar for sprinting, tied to a unique skill or resource, could add a layer of resource management that makes travel more engaging. In Ashes of Creation, inconvenience is gameplay—it’s a fundamental part of what makes exploration and progression in a world with meaningful scale.
  • Blood_RavenBlood_Raven Member, Alpha Two
    I think both sides of this argument are correct. I personally love the slower more localized pace we have seen for exploring the world. Does it take time to get places? Yes and that is okay. EQ it was a massive project to get to one side of the world to the other before the moon expansion. A lot of times you picked a zone or area and did all your fighting there for several levels before moving to another area. I have no issue with this approach. If you die along the way and get sent back, that can suck a ton. makes you play more carefully and bind to nearby locations if your going to be fighting.

    Now on the other side of the coin I played a Sorc in EQ and since there was only 2 porting classes at the time it made being a Sorc a great asset I cant tell you how many times I got tells from people asking for help to get somewhere or gathering the guild for a raid in some out of the way spot. It was fun and made the druid and sorc more important in the game. I have no issues if somewhere along the line Ashes gives 1 class like mage / mage the ability to portal to a limited number of locations making them a must for any guild or for groups trying to fight somewhere. For the vast majority of us we will still be riding horses around and sometimes yelling for a mage to portal us for X amount of gold somewhere.

    As long as the possible fast travel option is contained in a class and they never add a hub for fast travel that anyone can use. Along with keeping the number of locations very limited that a Mage could travel to I don't see a real problem in fact i see the opposite, another economic opportunity for players.
  • AzheraeAzherae Member, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    I thought today while playing something else that if Ashes did add Fast Travel or if any game wanted to remove it, I feel it doesn't have to be all or nothing.

    "You can fast Travel 3 times total per RL day and not more than once every game day" is fine with me.

    Not really related to Travel times, per se, and I don't actually love Fast Travel or anything, but if one was ever going to compromise, I feel this one could maybe work even in Ashes.
    ♪ One Gummy Fish, two Gummy Fish, Red Gummy Fish, Blue Gummy Fish
  • RocketFarmerRocketFarmer Member, Alpha Two
    Ya’ll need to play Elite Dangerous and then the AoC travel won’t bother you.
  • novercalisnovercalis Member, Founder, Kickstarter, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    nanfoodle wrote: »
    novercalis wrote: »
    nanfoodle wrote: »
    novercalis wrote: »

    This game will not make it without casuals.


    Steven has been very open about this game not being for casual or for the massive. They are not seeking to beat WoW or be a WoW killer or have the most userbase. They have been very transparent of that fact throughout the years. He has stated he is fine this game being a niche game for a niche audience.

    There is going to be a massive rude awakening for a lot of gamers.

    Steven has been clear that this game is also for casuels. No MMO can make it without them. What he said this game will not be for everyone. The norm about 70-80% of a MMOs population is casual.

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/24rD9XofqNw

    then there was an interview either with Asmon, Summit or another big streamer and was adamant not everyone is going to see everything.

    also:
    https://youtu.be/aEa4QkICDTU?t=2046

    steven acknowledge small audience and is ok with it.
    https://youtu.be/1g2uxQfAJqA?t=114
    {UPK} United Player Killer - All your loot belongs to us.
  • SiendelSiendel Member, Alpha Two
    edited November 5
    I loved the approach in UO (launch version) where it took forever to travel, but you could mark runes (if you had that skill) with your current location. So you at least had to go to that place on foot/mount/boat first or pay someone to open a gate for you.

    That said, I don't see how that would work for AoC without imposing serious travel restrictions on what you could carry through so the world economy design and risk/reward intent isn't destroyed. And you'd have to consider the impact on PVP.

    I'm sure there are ways they could handle this, but every MMO I've played that had fast-travel also had some sort of exploit tied to it (at least at launch). For a game this early in development I'm fine with them leaving it out for now. Plus there will be a quicker type of travel system once nodes get advanced enough. And there is supposed to be node upgrade choices that speed up travel within their jurisdiction.
  • Tahiti02Tahiti02 Member, Alpha Two
    nanfoodle wrote: »
    novercalis wrote: »
    I love it. makes the world feels even LARGER and you get to appreciate everything around you.

    Once Caravan starts - the risk of travel time and the reward is the only thing I am worried. I hope it hits the right spot (reward) for long journeys.

    People are impatient and MMORPG isn't suited for the 2hr gamers either. This may not be the game for you. Fuck fast movement, fast travel.

    Everquest - From Halas to Gnome City was like 2.5hr. If you missed the boat to get to the 2nd continent, you had to wait 40 min for it to come back!

    Eventually, just like EQ, AoC will have spell casters create portals to some locations to assist with travel and I am okay with that, as long as those portals are very limited.

    Please don't change Ashes. I love this long journey. Just need more danger while traveling.

    This game will not make it without casuals.

    Then its not for them, lets not dumb down every single game so the "casuals" can play in their 1-2 hour window.

    Travel times are perfect, the scale of the world is a character of its own and that shouldn't change. You're not supposed to bounce around every part of the map every day. Its supposed to be an RPG and a journey.

    Devs, DO NOT change travel times. You have the perfect amount of travel time right now, and as more content gets added in, that will hopefully silence the complainers (usually they complain anyways).
  • novercalisnovercalis Member, Founder, Kickstarter, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    Siendel wrote: »
    I loved the approach in UO (launch version) where it took forever to travel, but you could mark runes (if you had that skill) with your current location. So you at least had to go to that place on foot/mount/boat first or pay someone to open a gate for you.

    That said, I don't see how that would work for AoC without imposing serious travel restrictions on what you could carry through so the world economy design and risk/reward intent isn't destroyed. And you'd have to consider the impact on PVP.

    I'm sure there are ways they could handle this, but every MMO I've played that had fast-travel also had some sort of exploit tied to it (at least at launch). For a game this early in development I'm fine with them leaving it out for now. Plus there will be a quicker type of travel system once nodes get advanced enough. And there is supposed to be node upgrade choices that speed up travel within their jurisdiction.

    I do remember they mentioning certain materials can't get teleported. so after a raid of a world boss is done, you're stuck on foot to get to safety. Therefor locking your entire raid to protect you.

    this was maybe 3-4 years ago on a dev talk. So they do intend to make certain resources not allowed to be teleported. So that would be awesome, a valheim-esque fast travel that doesnt benefit gatherers or special loot drops
    {UPK} United Player Killer - All your loot belongs to us.
  • nanfoodlenanfoodle Member, Founder, Kickstarter, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    Right from the Ashes Wiki. Ashes will have a place in Ashes. To keep them, we also need to cater to them. Steven in these quotes says straight up. Casuals will have a greater impact on the game. Why? Think for a second. There is more of them. Read below.

    Casual vs. hardcore players

    The multiple progression paths in Ashes of Creation are designed to suit different playstyles and offer different "lanes" for players depending on the time they have available to play.[66][67][68][69]

    Some progression paths will be more immediately achievable, which are more suited to casual players.[67]
    Triggered events such as cravans and sieges will allow casual players to participate in impactful events without significant time investment.[70]

    Lower level characters will have usefulness in mass combat that does not depend on their level, such as manning siege weapons, helping repair fortifications, bringing proximity-based buffs to key positions, using stealth or scaling walls. These types of things are relevant to the tide of battle and do not require the player to be max-level or have high combat stats.[71]

    There are events that are happening in the world in the game that you won't need to be a hardcore player to impact and join. For example, the triggered events from the PvE standpoint against the cities; the trades of the caravans; those natural battlegrounds that exist; the castle sieges you can login for. There is a lot of systems that are at play where a person can simply log in, participate, have fun, be impactful and then log out.[70] – Steven Sharif

    Other progression paths will require a significant time investment, which casual players will take longer to achieve than hardcore players.[67]

    The contribution of a large mass of casual players working together may have a greater impact on node progression than hardcore players. Hardcore players may be able to progress into to late-game content faster than casual players, but may lack the numbers to influence the nodes in those locations as quickly as the larger population of casual players.[67]

    Traditionally in MMORPGs you're going to see a larger population of casual players than you do of hardcore players; and that's just the way the cookie crumbles from a population standpoint. And because of that and the way that nodes collect experience and advance as a result of player activity, those casual players will actually have more impact on node progression than the hardcore players will: at least as I predict, because of the sheer quantity disproportionate between the two different groups of people... You may see in Ashes the smaller hardcore group of players progress further into the late-game content, right. But they don't have the numbers to influence the nodes in those locations as quickly as the more casual... larger population has near the outskirts.[67] – Steven Sharif
  • KusaijshiKusaijshi Member, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    i think that is something not everyone things about right now.
    When the game is released and 10000 aktiv players are on the map they will spread out and search there home.
    After finding your home you will Mostly stay in this area. I think it is not realy wanted that you are running to 10 different grinding spots at the same day just because you changed 1 group member :D .
    You and your guild will mostly stay near 1 metropolis and play around the nodes there.
    You will be grinding and gathering in this area and it will feel like YOUR home.
    Only for some big expeditions at the weekends or so you are your group/guild will trael around the world to other metropolises or areas to fight for worldbosses or caravans :D .

    AoC is not a game like new world where you casually teleport around the world without thinking why you een did that. if you travel somewhere it shuld have a meaning and not just to bring 5 ores from node 1 to node 2 because it feels better to have them all there :D .
  • nanfoodlenanfoodle Member, Founder, Kickstarter, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    edited November 5
    Kusaijshi wrote: »
    i think that is something not everyone things about right now.
    When the game is released and 10000 aktiv players are on the map they will spread out and search there home.
    After finding your home you will Mostly stay in this area. I think it is not realy wanted that you are running to 10 different grinding spots at the same day just because you changed 1 group member :D .
    You and your guild will mostly stay near 1 metropolis and play around the nodes there.
    You will be grinding and gathering in this area and it will feel like YOUR home.
    Only for some big expeditions at the weekends or so you are your group/guild will trael around the world to other metropolises or areas to fight for worldbosses or caravans :D .

    AoC is not a game like new world where you casually teleport around the world without thinking why you een did that. if you travel somewhere it shuld have a meaning and not just to bring 5 ores from node 1 to node 2 because it feels better to have them all there :D .

    As I said above, Steven has already talked about air ships, portals between science nodes, flight paths between nodes and family summoning. Asking for fast horse routes are not outside the current design. Matter of fact its a gold sink and only needs to be slightly faster then mounts by says 10-20% You would need to be in a node to use it and it would only go from node to node. So it wont get you everywhere easier. Letting people hop off the house at any time would make this work much like it did it DAoC. That game also kept fast travel in a minimum.
  • AszkalonAszkalon Member, Alpha Two
    Where is the Sprint Ability for Mounts in saw a Presentations quite a few Months ago ? :D



    I think i get it.

    It is a Spot-Test and to many People moving around TO QUICKLY -> meaning things are rendering in and out for them fast -> could crash the Server.


    This is why the Mountspeed is atrocious compared to the former Presentations. I think we will get faster Mount Speed only in Phase Two or Three. ;)
    a50whcz343yn.png
    ✓ Occasional Roleplayer
    ✓ Kinda starting to look for a Guild right now. (German)
  • ChicagoChicago Member, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    can't say i don't agree, i don't want to see things like portals or hearthstones, but i would like to see travel options between nodes, could be in the form of blimps, cart systems, or an underground tunnel through the underworld, i do like the fact that there is no flying mounts and teleports, but we do need some other options of travel
  • DezmerizingDezmerizing Member, Alpha Two
    Chicago wrote: »
    can't say i don't agree, i don't want to see things like portals or hearthstones, but i would like to see travel options between nodes, could be in the form of blimps, cart systems, or an underground tunnel through the underworld, i do like the fact that there is no flying mounts and teleports, but we do need some other options of travel

    Could a potential solution perhaps not be quicker travel, but travel not needing player monitoring?

    Perhaps mayors could agree on routes with guarded escort caravans that the players can utilize for a cheap cost? Public transportation if you will. One that can still be attacked by enemy players, but the guards make that much less likely (and probably often safer than travelling alone).

    Otherwise, I suppose BDOs solution of "auto walking" (on roads) would be a viable option?
    lizhctbms6kg.png
  • beretta7beretta7 Member, Alpha Two
    The long travel times I really don't mind. Used to it from other hardcore MMORPG's that I've played, and honestly this game is trying to really regionalize things and without this it will take away from that. With all that said you really do need a recall. Even the insane MMO's that were hardcore that I've played most of them had a recall. I do believe not having a recall does take away from the enjoyment. Few times I traveled to the edge and was just like...meh I'm logging out.
  • KusaijshiKusaijshi Member, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    i think its wanted that you dont have a recall (without a cost).
    You can fast "recall" by dieng but that costs some of your materials so yea this one hurts :D.

    But i think its wanted in the form of worldbosses or stealen goods in your inventory.
    If you steal dropped cargo from caravans or get a super rare material from a worldboss fight you would just press Return and your loot would be saved.

    If you need to run home the "loosers" from the last fight get a chance to take the item back before you reach your home. i think that is the reason why there is no return teleport.
    And with dieng you get a respawn.
    i for myself was farming mobs on the east of the map and then found a group near my home. i sold my glint and just died.
    i lost some exp but thats it. i was instant home :D .

    i dont want fast travels in this game and i dont want AUTO travel. thats just shit seeing everyone riding afk the same way. and this would only end with PKler camping the afk routes killing the afks :D who are traveling to other nodes by system
  • AzheraeAzherae Member, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    Chicago wrote: »
    can't say i don't agree, i don't want to see things like portals or hearthstones, but i would like to see travel options between nodes, could be in the form of blimps, cart systems, or an underground tunnel through the underworld, i do like the fact that there is no flying mounts and teleports, but we do need some other options of travel

    Could a potential solution perhaps not be quicker travel, but travel not needing player monitoring?

    Perhaps mayors could agree on routes with guarded escort caravans that the players can utilize for a cheap cost? Public transportation if you will. One that can still be attacked by enemy players, but the guards make that much less likely (and probably often safer than travelling alone).

    Otherwise, I suppose BDOs solution of "auto walking" (on roads) would be a viable option?

    Just a reminder to all that even though this page starts by saying there will be no 'Go to Waypoint' mechanics, that has been mentioned as an option.

    https://ashesofcreation.wiki/Player_movement#Public_transportation
    ♪ One Gummy Fish, two Gummy Fish, Red Gummy Fish, Blue Gummy Fish
Sign In or Register to comment.