ferryman wrote: » We could ask whos fault is that raging and crying? It is only Intrepid Studios own fault. Maybe it was the plan from the beginning or maybe it was a change of strategy... In any case, they have misleaded people and now they just have to deal with that negative feedback. Unfortunately they have deserved it and only time will tell if they get their reputation back.
Caeryl wrote: » ferryman wrote: » We could ask whos fault is that raging and crying? It is only Intrepid Studios own fault. Maybe it was the plan from the beginning or maybe it was a change of strategy... In any case, they have misleaded people and now they just have to deal with that negative feedback. Unfortunately they have deserved it and only time will tell if they get their reputation back. Speaking of angst from people who don’t understand why APOC exists
Cain wrote: » Even got to try out alpha test 1 what? the mmo alpha test 1 ? if that is what you meant you do realize that ironing out combat is one of the last things to happen. In previous years you would of never seen a single piece of work from a game at this stage in development Early access has warped your outlook on things. Yes APOC is going to be a stand alone game, BUT you will be seeing them iterate on the combat systems < not just swinging a weapon, but weapon impact, projectile speed, unit collision, what uses stam/what doesnt/ how much. Is mobility too high, is mobility in combat too low while using it to run too high.> TLDR- Before early access wave you wouldnt even know a game existed at this stage of development. you are testing and helping shape the game systems with feedback. so enjoy the ride or get off the bus.
Nagash wrote: » Caeryl wrote: » ferryman wrote: » We could ask whos fault is that raging and crying? It is only Intrepid Studios own fault. Maybe it was the plan from the beginning or maybe it was a change of strategy... In any case, they have misleaded people and now they just have to deal with that negative feedback. Unfortunately they have deserved it and only time will tell if they get their reputation back. Speaking of angst from people who don’t understand why APOC exists We all know why Apoc exists, but that does not mean we have to like it. I'm sick of people who say we can't have bad opinions about apoc and that we should be quiet. The game is a test, and we know that but its also monetised and will soon be a stand-alone game. If the was the alpha of the MMORPG then I could understand some defences but its not the alpha test of the MMORPG its not even a full test of the combat as stated by steven, it just feels like its a waste of time and resources, but thats just me.
Caeryl wrote: » Nagash wrote: » Caeryl wrote: » ferryman wrote: » We could ask whos fault is that raging and crying? It is only Intrepid Studios own fault. Maybe it was the plan from the beginning or maybe it was a change of strategy... In any case, they have misleaded people and now they just have to deal with that negative feedback. Unfortunately they have deserved it and only time will tell if they get their reputation back. Speaking of angst from people who don’t understand why APOC exists We all know why Apoc exists, but that does not mean we have to like it. I'm sick of people who say we can't have bad opinions about apoc and that we should be quiet. The game is a test, and we know that but its also monetised and will soon be a stand-alone game. If the was the alpha of the MMORPG then I could understand some defences but its not the alpha test of the MMORPG its not even a full test of the combat as stated by steven, it just feels like its a waste of time and resources, but thats just me. It has this far established and aided in the development of a stable backend that allows for large node wars. It is currently bringing in grouping mechanics, figuring out how to exclude friendlies from damage via squads a duos, testing movement mechanics for gliding, horseback, and on foot, and establishing basic functionality of casting. You can hate BRs all you like, I don’t enjoy them either, but to call it a waste of resources is disingenuous.
Makinoji wrote: » I remember watching a content creator and his panel talk about this very topic. I believe the general tone was no one is going to care about the bad press the BR is getting once the MMO is in testing phase. This being my first game to follow so early on, I kind of wish I wouldn't have lol Not in a bad way just that the anxiety of it all is a bit much. Every MMO I've been green from the start and it was always disheartening to hear about how that particular game was rubbish due to changes or financing from the older backers. Since I had no clue about that, I just enjoyed the game for what it was at the time and loved a few. So I believe the negative cloud surrounding APOC and IS will eventually dampen down, once players are in the MMO and deciding for themselves.
Wololo wrote: » Shroud is streaming for 30k viewers rn, and the chat seems pretty positive and understanding for the mmo. This is great to see
Nagash wrote: » Caeryl wrote: » ferryman wrote: » We could ask whos fault is that raging and crying? It is only Intrepid Studios own fault. Maybe it was the plan from the beginning or maybe it was a change of strategy... In any case, they have misleaded people and now they just have to deal with that negative feedback. Unfortunately they have deserved it and only time will tell if they get their reputation back. Speaking of angst from people who don’t understand why APOC exists I'm sick of people who say we can't have bad opinions about apoc and that we should be quiet.