
The same price has been set for
Dawnbreaker and Pridestalker, they both use the same skeleton.
What does epic mean? Is this a mount or mount skin?
If it's a mount, it would make sense, since the colors look natural. If not, there should NOT be a recolored version of them whatsoever, and preferably, no skeleton reuse either, unless for mobs and NPCs!!

See? If it is a mount skin, it means everyone can have it for FREE. But this IS a mount, right?!
But to avoid P2W, it will be tamed/obtained through a quest?

During Kickstarter, there was a confusion in regards to 'mounts' and 'mount skins' being the same thing.
The last time Steven mentioned non-dragon Epic mounts was in 2017. I think we deserve an update/refresh Intrepid's memories.
The question for you little humans is: Do you agree that an $50 epic mount's skeleton should be reused for another mount?
Dragons:
"Exclusive" dragon
Ochre Legion Wyrmling Dragon


They might not be the same, but still very similar. I believe the regular free version will not be "that" different for the Ochre Legion Wyrmling considering how plain it looks.
"Recolored skins should be cheaper"
Initially, in this post I wanted to talk about the Gryphons in APOC.
A merely recolored version from the original, costs $20!
This also applies to exclusive mounts and pets. We have seen a regular crow with 6 tiny eyes costing $15. I understand it's exclusive and I'm fine with it. But we have seen the same thing happen with non-exclusives(gryphon and dragon).
Feel free to talk about that as well.
unimportant note: I think the crow should have a dark aura surrounding it to look cool.