ferryman wrote: » I like dogs.
Nagash wrote: » I am the only one who has lost track of whats going on in this thread?
noaani wrote: » Honestly, this thread has bought up more questions than it's answered...
Varkun wrote: » I know people are upset about apoc but the new map they have put together out of parts of the alpha 1 map is really quite gorgeous the forested area and the snow. Really will be a stunning world to adventure in once we get the MMO.
ferryman wrote: » In the latest newsletter, did people notice how many times there is mentioned MMORPG when speaking of Apoc? It would be enough to do that once or twice, but damn, now IS is trying way too hard to justify Apoc related news. *facepalm*@Varkun Now devs start with Alpha 1 mention, but unfortunately they are not giving anything solid. I guess the alpha 1 is not that close, because the focus is next in castle siege for Apoc. I was wondering what is the latest plan for start of AoC A1 or is there any plans atm? Q is accurate enough..
LadyZel wrote: » I heard about AoC a while ago and decided to keep an intrigued eye on it. I decided to check up on how things are developing only to find the focus seems to be on Apocalypse. I'm in a sceptical place because I've seen game companies behave deceptively in the past. Now, I'm not saying Intrepid is doing so, but as an avid MMO player I am disappointed they decided to go the BR route. No MMO in development I've followed in the past needed to use such a mode to test anything. Intrepid have chosen to do things a little differently, that's fine. But I've seen alpha/beta games offer very little in development, although they made sure they had a functioning cash shop...only for the game to crash and burn either before or soon after launch. The signs don't bode well. I don't care about what the defenders want to say. I've seen people defend the most abysmal games, even right up until the game flopped. It means nothing. Integrity from the developer is what matters. I hope Intrepid prove me and other doubters wrong, but they're getting no money from me until I'm confident they are working on the MMO. You want me as a paying customer then show me what you originally advertised AoC to be.
ferryman wrote: » Those who do not like the Apoc, what ever reason, it is a far from win-win situation.
TrePalle wrote: » ferryman wrote: » Those who do not like the Apoc, what ever reason, it is a far from win-win situation. It seems so and i can't understand why?? Its free, it gives you rewards, it helps the devs make a better game and it not like you are forced to play it if you do not want too.
ferryman wrote: » TrePalle wrote: » ferryman wrote: » Those who do not like the Apoc, what ever reason, it is a far from win-win situation. It seems so and i can't understand why?? Its free, it gives you rewards, it helps the devs make a better game and it not like you are forced to play it if you do not want too. Yeah it really seams you do not understand.. In this thread people have pointed several reasons for that. Here is few points to think of: - Some people do not care about cosmetics. - Why to play something you do not like? - Some people do not want to support this kind of behaviour from developers side. - Some people have lost their faith for IS. - Some people have lost their hope getting the MMORPG. - Why collect cosmetics for a game, which future feels unsure. - Some people do not like BR concept. - Some people feels misleaded. - Some people are angry. - Some people backed for MMO and they got BR. - Not everyone believe everything what they have told. ...or what ever reason. It is important to understand people at both sides of Apoc conversation. Some people are totally fine with Apoc and still faithful with the MMO -project and in other extreme are those who hate Apoc and IS because what they have done, and then we have people everywhere between these two extremes. At the end it does not matter who is right, it is all about how people feel.