BlackBrony wrote: » The only democratic node is scientific. Military requires a battle Divine doing quest Economic is a bid, therefore money. Even if a streamer gets hold of Mayorship, it will be required for people to vote each month. A streamer is a really bad mayor, because all of his/her strategy will be plain to see for everyone, even enemies trying to figure out defenses. So probably, if you have a house in such Node, it's not really a safe choice. Sure, people might vote for streamer the first time, then lose all houses, resources to a Node War, and stop voting streamers.
Undead Canuck wrote: » Military is an arena. They haven't said it will be a free for all. It may be a 1 on 1 ladder tournament.https://ashesofcreation.wiki/Military_nodes Economic, you have to have lots of people donate a lot of gold each time. No matter what node type, the streamer and all followers would have to already be a citizen. Since there are soft caps on population, they would have to find a node at the start, all become citizens, and then they could control it going forwards. But then everyone else could just leave and siege it with alliances. Coordinating that many people to be all citizens of one node would be very improbable.
Aardvark wrote: » Undead Canuck wrote: » Military is an arena. They haven't said it will be a free for all. It may be a 1 on 1 ladder tournament.https://ashesofcreation.wiki/Military_nodes Economic, you have to have lots of people donate a lot of gold each time. No matter what node type, the streamer and all followers would have to already be a citizen. Since there are soft caps on population, they would have to find a node at the start, all become citizens, and then they could control it going forwards. But then everyone else could just leave and siege it with alliances. Coordinating that many people to be all citizens of one node would be very improbable. In a game based on hard counters random 1vs1 pvp tournament will never work. It would be more about which class drew which class than how well you played.
Amist wrote: » Aardvark wrote: » Undead Canuck wrote: » Military is an arena. They haven't said it will be a free for all. It may be a 1 on 1 ladder tournament.https://ashesofcreation.wiki/Military_nodes Economic, you have to have lots of people donate a lot of gold each time. No matter what node type, the streamer and all followers would have to already be a citizen. Since there are soft caps on population, they would have to find a node at the start, all become citizens, and then they could control it going forwards. But then everyone else could just leave and siege it with alliances. Coordinating that many people to be all citizens of one node would be very improbable. In a game based on hard counters random 1vs1 pvp tournament will never work. It would be more about which class drew which class than how well you played. Which is why the militaristic election will require for you to create a champion, rather than use your own character for combat.
CaptainChuck wrote: » Here you go.https://forums.ashesofcreation.com/discussion/44956
CaptainChuck wrote: » CaptainChuck wrote: » Here you go.https://forums.ashesofcreation.com/post/editdiscussion/44956 I made a detailed post about this topic. Just read it. It explains why everything will balance out, when it comes to streamer privilege, in AoC, unlike in WoW.
CaptainChuck wrote: » Here you go.https://forums.ashesofcreation.com/post/editdiscussion/44956
CasualEthan wrote: » Its very possible IMO they wont let the same mayor take over month after month anyways thus solving this issue.
BlackBrony wrote: » CaptainChuck wrote: » CaptainChuck wrote: » Here you go.https://forums.ashesofcreation.com/post/editdiscussion/44956 I made a detailed post about this topic. Just read it. It explains why everything will balance out, when it comes to streamer privilege, in AoC, unlike in WoW. This wasn't working for me, use this https://forums.ashesofcreation.com/discussion/44956
phdmonster wrote: » CasualEthan wrote: » Its very possible IMO they wont let the same mayor take over month after month anyways thus solving this issue. That really depends. If the mayor is bad, someone will most probably step up and take his place. If the mayor is a good ruler and does stuff properly, then i don't see why people who are happy with him would want him replaced.
Aardvark wrote: » phdmonster wrote: » CasualEthan wrote: » Its very possible IMO they wont let the same mayor take over month after month anyways thus solving this issue. That really depends. If the mayor is bad, someone will most probably step up and take his place. If the mayor is a good ruler and does stuff properly, then i don't see why people who are happy with him would want him replaced. Because it will be like in real life politics, bribes will happen, favors will happen, for and against parties will happen.
noaani wrote: » Aardvark wrote: » phdmonster wrote: » CasualEthan wrote: » Its very possible IMO they wont let the same mayor take over month after month anyways thus solving this issue. That really depends. If the mayor is bad, someone will most probably step up and take his place. If the mayor is a good ruler and does stuff properly, then i don't see why people who are happy with him would want him replaced. Because it will be like in real life politics, bribes will happen, favors will happen, for and against parties will happen. I'm fairly sure this is the point of the whole thing.
Aardvark wrote: » noaani wrote: » Aardvark wrote: » phdmonster wrote: » CasualEthan wrote: » Its very possible IMO they wont let the same mayor take over month after month anyways thus solving this issue. That really depends. If the mayor is bad, someone will most probably step up and take his place. If the mayor is a good ruler and does stuff properly, then i don't see why people who are happy with him would want him replaced. Because it will be like in real life politics, bribes will happen, favors will happen, for and against parties will happen. I'm fairly sure this is the point of the whole thing. You think the whole point of the game is to have popularity contests that give game breaking advantages to certain people and their friends?