Keith wrote: » bloodprophet wrote: » Hence why I said they should both be removed. Stay on topic Obv that's true. But wont happen because clearly SJW have already infiltrated AoC.
bloodprophet wrote: » Hence why I said they should both be removed. Stay on topic
Keith wrote: » The la Lazyactor wrote: » Keith wrote: » bloodprophet wrote: » Hence why I said they should both be removed. Stay on topic Obv that's true. But wont happen because clearly SJW have already infiltrated AoC. Yeah except even that person is overreaching quite a bit in a way most of use detest they are still talking about the game. Where as a satire over what they did is simply you wanting attention. Even if you found the idea they had detestable you should still conduct yourself with class an not clutter the forum where everyone wants to talk about the game with attention seeking nonsense. The last message i read in that thread was people going back and forth about racism accusations. Yeah real game related stuff.
Lazyactor wrote: » Keith wrote: » bloodprophet wrote: » Hence why I said they should both be removed. Stay on topic Obv that's true. But wont happen because clearly SJW have already infiltrated AoC. Yeah except even that person is overreaching quite a bit in a way most of use detest they are still talking about the game. Where as a satire over what they did is simply you wanting attention. Even if you found the idea they had detestable you should still conduct yourself with class an not clutter the forum where everyone wants to talk about the game with attention seeking nonsense.
Keith wrote: » Lazyactor wrote: » Keith wrote: » The la Lazyactor wrote: » Keith wrote: » bloodprophet wrote: » Hence why I said they should both be removed. Stay on topic Obv that's true. But wont happen because clearly SJW have already infiltrated AoC. Yeah except even that person is overreaching quite a bit in a way most of use detest they are still talking about the game. Where as a satire over what they did is simply you wanting attention. Even if you found the idea they had detestable you should still conduct yourself with class an not clutter the forum where everyone wants to talk about the game with attention seeking nonsense. The last message i read in that thread was people going back and forth about racism accusations. Yeah real game related stuff. Yeah but the initial post was about the game itself. However bad the idea or however badly it was presented you cant deny that is what the post was about....the game. A satire about someone using politics to talk about the game isnt actually talking about the game. Its childish attention seeking. No place on the forums where we wanna talk about the game. I know you understand what I am saying. You dont have to reply with your acknowledgement of making a pointless unrelated thread for attention. But to go out of your way to accuse the company of siding with your political opponent is quite extreme and pathologically paranoid. You can make that claim if the company allows purely political posts instead of posts about the game in favor of your ideological opponent but wont allow you to rebuke the posts or post your own views. That is favoritism the other is just crowd control. The two most liked posts in the thread in question apart from the first response are blatantly calling that post out for what it is. "politically motivated".
Lazyactor wrote: » Keith wrote: » The la Lazyactor wrote: » Keith wrote: » bloodprophet wrote: » Hence why I said they should both be removed. Stay on topic Obv that's true. But wont happen because clearly SJW have already infiltrated AoC. Yeah except even that person is overreaching quite a bit in a way most of use detest they are still talking about the game. Where as a satire over what they did is simply you wanting attention. Even if you found the idea they had detestable you should still conduct yourself with class an not clutter the forum where everyone wants to talk about the game with attention seeking nonsense. The last message i read in that thread was people going back and forth about racism accusations. Yeah real game related stuff. Yeah but the initial post was about the game itself. However bad the idea or however badly it was presented you cant deny that is what the post was about....the game. A satire about someone using politics to talk about the game isnt actually talking about the game. Its childish attention seeking. No place on the forums where we wanna talk about the game. I know you understand what I am saying. You dont have to reply with your acknowledgement of making a pointless unrelated thread for attention. But to go out of your way to accuse the company of siding with your political opponent is quite extreme and pathologically paranoid. You can make that claim if the company allows purely political posts instead of posts about the game in favor of your ideological opponent but wont allow you to rebuke the posts or post your own views. That is favoritism the other is just crowd control.
Keith wrote: » So I recently made a satire post, political in nature to joke about injecting politics into AoC. That post was removed by Greypelt citing "we dont allow political topics" now please look at the topic still going called "To avoid the "racism trap", a clearer distinction should be made between "race" and "culture"".
