Warhog53 wrote: » Firstly, OMG BARDS YESSS! With that out of the way, pretty much my only experience with a bard was in EQ. Where you had a limited number of songs slotted, with short durations on each. This meant you could "twist" different songs in and out to fit the encounter, while still doing a bit of dps. EQ2 did away with the twisting, and made the bard effects more skill based. I far prefer the former. Are there some other bard experiences you all would recommend to pull inspiration from? Personally, the experience in EQ is my favorite, but I'm interested to know the direction of the studio
Liftinmammals wrote: » I am so stoked to be a bard. To be a dwarven bard roaming the lands singing and dancing my way to glory from city to city. A lowly street performer making his way coin by coin, a hired singer for your weddings and festivals, and a member of your party there for moral support. *lute melodies fading away*
Niraada wrote: » I really enjoyed Zither's gameplay in Dragon Age 3, where you had "Songs", and a set of chords you could play, that you would line up to assemble each song and get a given effect. Weaving together chords and aligning when a particular song would drop, granting its effect was a lot of fun and had you constantly working to make sure you were always in a position to trigger a heal if a boss' big attack was about to come out, or a power buff for your team if it was about to fall off.
Pl1x wrote: » They said classes would be balanced like rock, paper, scissors, to me that sounds like a bard will beat many classes in 1v1. Reading people's comments, it sounds like most seem to think it'll be someone dancing and singing on the battlefield, just buffing teammates and not fighting at all.
Warhog53 wrote: » Pl1x wrote: » They said classes would be balanced like rock, paper, scissors, to me that sounds like a bard will beat many classes in 1v1. Reading people's comments, it sounds like most seem to think it'll be someone dancing and singing on the battlefield, just buffing teammates and not fighting at all. Not sure if this was directed at me but, that is far from my intent. Most on vanilla EQ hated a duel with a well played bard because they had so many tricks up their sleeve. Most tricks got nerfed so hard people stopped playing them. A bard in vanilla EQ might not kill you quickly, but they were absolutely capable of it. And would make you miserable while they did
Warhog53 wrote: » A bard in vanilla EQ might not kill you quickly, but they were absolutely capable of it. And would make you miserable while they did