tautau wrote: » Let's set examples that, at least sometimes, will change them.
Khambhat wrote: » tautau wrote: » Let's set examples that, at least sometimes, will change them. Lead by example. I think the people worried about the toxicity of the player base simply have to try and set examples. There's always going to min/max, hardcore players who enjoy griefing but there are a lot of decent folks out there willing to be decent. Not carebears, just decent.
Nagash wrote: » I mean the game is a while from release and the community we have already seems to be doing pretty well
D3ATHSPARK wrote: » Nagash wrote: » I mean the game is a while from release and the community we have already seems to be doing pretty well I plan to create content which is why I think about stuff like this early on. It's true that the bulk of the community seems pretty good, but there are definitely some bad apples out there. Most of those bad apples are leading guilds too so it will be interesting seeing how long they last.
Nagash wrote: » D3ATHSPARK wrote: » Nagash wrote: » I mean the game is a while from release and the community we have already seems to be doing pretty well I plan to create content which is why I think about stuff like this early on. It's true that the bulk of the community seems pretty good, but there are definitely some bad apples out there. Most of those bad apples are leading guilds too so it will be interesting seeing how long they last. How do you mean by "bad apples" are they toxic or are they people you dislike?
D3ATHSPARK wrote: » Nagash wrote: » D3ATHSPARK wrote: » Nagash wrote: » I mean the game is a while from release and the community we have already seems to be doing pretty well I plan to create content which is why I think about stuff like this early on. It's true that the bulk of the community seems pretty good, but there are definitely some bad apples out there. Most of those bad apples are leading guilds too so it will be interesting seeing how long they last. How do you mean by "bad apples" are they toxic or are they people you dislike? Toxic and destructive. The game is still 1+ years out and I've already had a guild attempt to sabotage mine. It's pretty sad. Lot's of juvenile behavior to weed through. The content creators are pretty awesome so far. I hope those individuals keep going.
Big Banana wrote: » I can relate about community being a major part of the gaming experience and I believe it still is. I also remember playing WoW when it was first out as well as Runescape. Back then MMOs were so new and exciting. There was a real feel of adventure and there wasn't a guide to every quest, how to level up quickly, or get gold fast. The same applied to me for MapleStory since I really stuck around because of how awesome the community was and how helpful players would be. You'll always have people who try to take advantage of things. With the way Ashes is set up I believe it will be much easier to focus on building friendships and alliances to get things done since the world will be constantly changing on every server and there won't be a way to just Wiki all the quests because not every server will have access to all of them based on how Nodes develop. Same will apply with resources, dungeons, etc. This should really shape for a better community in general since it will take effort and teamwork to truely move forward with characters and the environment.
Karatos wrote: » Just read this conversation, the empirical evidence is present. I never had a conversation with this guy in my life prior to this thread and he's been steep in conjecture and fallacious rhetoric about how he views people.
D3ATHSPARK wrote: » Karatos wrote: » Just read this conversation, the empirical evidence is present. I never had a conversation with this guy in my life prior to this thread and he's been steep in conjecture and fallacious rhetoric about how he views people. It's just you clowns.
Karatos wrote: » D3ATHSPARK wrote: » Karatos wrote: » Just read this conversation, the empirical evidence is present. I never had a conversation with this guy in my life prior to this thread and he's been steep in conjecture and fallacious rhetoric about how he views people. It's just you clowns. Again, I don't know you. Nor do I care. The only thing I see here is you're some narcissist on the internet who lumps a whole group of people together for saying you type slow, that's your business. Own it. Your fallacious reasoning for why you hate a whole crew is for you to sort out. It would help that you didn't act like a man-child and throw a fit, make some BS up without any empirical evidence. It just makes you out to be a liar.
D3ATHSPARK wrote: » Karatos wrote: » D3ATHSPARK wrote: » Karatos wrote: » Just read this conversation, the empirical evidence is present. I never had a conversation with this guy in my life prior to this thread and he's been steep in conjecture and fallacious rhetoric about how he views people. It's just you clowns. Again, I don't know you. Nor do I care. The only thing I see here is you're some narcissist on the internet who lumps a whole group of people together for saying you type slow, that's your business. Own it. Your fallacious reasoning for why you hate a whole crew is for you to sort out. It would help that you didn't act like a man-child and throw a fit, make some BS up without any empirical evidence. It just makes you out to be a liar. The fact that you can sit there and believe it's over something as petty as that is just sad. It just shows your low level of intelligence honestly. I could honestly care less what you or anyone else thinks. I know what happened and that word will continue to spread.
D3ATHSPARK wrote: » Elleandrias wrote: » This is coming from the toxic individual that blocked an entire guild on discord because he got meme'd on for typing forever xD We meme on Steven for typing forever and its not toxic man, its a joke. And I know plenty of old school MMORPG-ers that don't think the community is "toxic" at all, your subjective opinion on what is toxic and what isn't toxic is very different from the rest of the community and with you making asinine comments saying an entire guild is toxic when you really just got sad from some words only makes the situation worse. You don't even have the whole story yet you're running your mouth. I could care less what a bunch of kids say to me, or how you put it "meme" on me. I have incredibly thick skin and don't take a single thing to heart. Sure I blocked a few so I didn't have to read juvenile comments but that is not how Enveus got blacklisted. That happened when they got butthurt over me blocking them and they decided to join my Discord and attempted to sabotage my guild. Any guild that uses a mob mentality to do something like that earns a global blacklist imo. So you're guilty by association. Maybe understand who your GM is before trying to defend such toxic people.
Elleandrias wrote: » This is coming from the toxic individual that blocked an entire guild on discord because he got meme'd on for typing forever xD We meme on Steven for typing forever and its not toxic man, its a joke. And I know plenty of old school MMORPG-ers that don't think the community is "toxic" at all, your subjective opinion on what is toxic and what isn't toxic is very different from the rest of the community and with you making asinine comments saying an entire guild is toxic when you really just got sad from some words only makes the situation worse.
Dygz wrote: » Cold 0ne FTB wrote: » Well no. Your wrong. You might not specifically consent to fight that person but every time you go somewheres were PvP is a possibility you are by default consenting to it. If we were default consenting to PvP combat by hitting Launch, we would be combatants by default. And, there would be no penalty for killing non-combatants because there would be no such thing as non-combatants. Facts are facts. So, I am not wrong. Deterrent for griefing is the same as reducing toxicity. Which is my point. It is true that if you choose to participate in a Siege, Caravan or other type of battlegrounds, that is consent. Ashes is PvX. We agree.
Cold 0ne FTB wrote: » Well no. Your wrong. You might not specifically consent to fight that person but every time you go somewheres were PvP is a possibility you are by default consenting to it.