Lithion wrote: » Zahie wrote: » I don't think it's simply about hate against sexy female characters. It's more about the sexual objectifying of female game characters and females in general. So far every girl that has commented has been in favor of making sexy characters though. So who is getting upset about sexualizing's women? Most of this topic isn't about putting women in mini bikinis or anything, just more feminine armor that is form fitting and sexy looking. Wouldn't you agree that most women would like the option to make their character sexy from time to time and feel sexy as they play? If you look back at page one the post by @Leiloni was a good example of sexy but still practical. I'm in agreement that bikini armor is a bit immersion breaking because how does it protect anything lol but I think a lot of this thread is just asking for armor that is more sexy than what we are getting currently. NOT full stripper mode lol
Zahie wrote: » I don't think it's simply about hate against sexy female characters. It's more about the sexual objectifying of female game characters and females in general.
Lithion wrote: » Not trying to argue, I'm legit curious on why so many people hate sexy female characters in games.
Zahie wrote: » Why do you get so triggerd? I just answerd your question about why so many people hate sexy female characters in games. I'll repeat myself, I don't think it's about hating sexy female characters pers se, I think its more about disliking the sexual objectifying of femele characters. If you're not sure what sexual objectification really is, you can read about it here.https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_objectification You said you was legitly curious and didn't want to argue, but yet you still trying to argue. Lithion wrote: » Not trying to argue, I'm legit curious on why so many people hate sexy female characters in games. And what other girls in this thread has commented is irrelevant with your question and with my answer. I'm well aware what this threads is about. I did add my own opinion to the thread, it's on the first page.
Lithion wrote: » Zahie wrote: » Why do you get so triggerd? I just answerd your question about why so many people hate sexy female characters in games. I'll repeat myself, I don't think it's about hating sexy female characters pers se, I think its more about disliking the sexual objectifying of femele characters. If you're not sure what sexual objectification really is, you can read about it here.https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_objectification You said you was legitly curious and didn't want to argue, but yet you still trying to argue. Lithion wrote: » Not trying to argue, I'm legit curious on why so many people hate sexy female characters in games. And what other girls in this thread has commented is irrelevant with your question and with my answer. I'm well aware what this threads is about. I did add my own opinion to the thread, it's on the first page. I'm not triggered at all, was just responding to your point with a counter point. I was originally asking why he seemed upset about sexy female characters and then you pointed out that its most likely more about women being sexually objectified. But i disagree that making more feminine armor is the same as objectifying women. Just because a game gives players the option to dress more sexy or in form fitting ways that express more feminine styles, doesn't mean they are trying to sexually objectify women.
Dygz wrote: » I think part of the issue people have with bikini armor is that it shouldn't be able to function as armor because there's not enough of it to protect the revealed skin and body parts. I mean - men can wear bikini armor, too. Especially in a Barbarian Fantasy setting. Barbarian fantasy is typically a low magic setting, though. In a high magic setting, people can get their armor ratings increased via jewelry and a wide variety of Enchantments, rather than from the physical dynamics of their armor. Some Polynesian, Native American and African cultures would be increasing armor ratings via tattoos and ritual scarrification. Due to the tattoos and scarrification available in the UE5 Character Creator, I will certainly have Vek and Nikua who wish to display their tattoos and scarrification. Not only will I want to transmog chest pieces to be invisible, I will also want to wear armor and costumes that reveal my tattoos and scarrification. The devs have said that there will be a variety of armor sets that reveal tattoos. So.... I definitely now want to see some armor sets and costumes that are revealing. Especially ones designed to show off tattoos and scarrification. Revealing is not necesarily the same thing as "sexy".
Sybil_Lanel wrote: » As a Female MMO gamer I would like to suggest giving more effeminate options in armor styles. My concern is that I would like to have the option for dressing effeminately. The reason I am suggesting to make it optional is so people can dress as feminine or masculine or neutral as the player choses. This aids players self expression. Different armor styles as well as jewelry and makeup would be very helpful in this goal. I understand that you would like to keep things on the more practical side but this could be stifling to the communities creativity. Self expression and fashion is very important to me as a player I would like as many options as possible in creating my character.
Kreed wrote: » As long as they are not as conservative as ESO's female wardrobes. Dont get me wrong ESO had some snappy sharp looking out fits but they still were lacking in Sex appeal. The ones they did create to have sex appeal were terrible designs.
Leiloni wrote: » Vaknar wrote: » It's certainly interesting seeing this thread, and others like it come up recently. I think we still have yet to see a large majority of the different gear appearances in the game (whether in-game achievable or cosmetic). With that said, I think there may be gear sets in the future that please some who are concerned about this! Steven has said he doesn't like the idea of 'bikini armor' but hasn't ruled out form-fitting gear appearances, or more revealing ones ^_^ If you have thoughts on this and you're just happening to see this thread, please feel free to drop your thoughts in a comment! There's definitely a huge middle ground between Bikini armor and Brienne of Tarth. You can have fashionable armor that covers most or all of a character. I would suggest taking a look at Aion's Chain armor sets for Cleric/Chanter over the years. They've been incredibly creative in making armor that looks like armor but still looks attractive. Some quick pics I found while searching (note: These look better in game but I can't find real screenshots right now!): The thighs are a bit ugly on this second one but the rest of the set is nice.
Vaknar wrote: » It's certainly interesting seeing this thread, and others like it come up recently. I think we still have yet to see a large majority of the different gear appearances in the game (whether in-game achievable or cosmetic). With that said, I think there may be gear sets in the future that please some who are concerned about this! Steven has said he doesn't like the idea of 'bikini armor' but hasn't ruled out form-fitting gear appearances, or more revealing ones ^_^ If you have thoughts on this and you're just happening to see this thread, please feel free to drop your thoughts in a comment!
Caeryl wrote: » If you put those female armor designs on a male character model and it would look silly, then it shouldn’t be on a female model either. All these boob windows and huge armorless gaps for “sexy leg flash” are so damn annoying I don’t want any significant difference in design between male and female versions. They should be adjusted to fit physical forms, but obviously there shouldn’t be coverage lost from the male > female designs. Outfits that display more skin should be equitable between both sexes, like those shaman costumes. Don’t give me a damn dress for my female characters while the males get a suit when using the same outfit.