LuKe_NuKeS_Em wrote: » Please keep the discussion on topic. How do you prove that a trade in-game was legit or the result of RMT? Is there a tenable solution that the community would find acceptable?
Robtzu wrote: » The only way to get rid of gold farmers and bots is to have the studio sell it themself cheaper than the gold farmers. Since there is a no p2w pledge that will not happen.
LuKe_NuKeS_Em wrote: » Real money trading (RMT) or buying in game currency with real world money is going to be available to anyone with expendable income. If you have a legal way to stop people in real life making deals with their own money that affect the game please post below. How do you prove that a trade in-game was legit or the result of RMT? Is there a tenable solution that the community would find acceptable? I read one post that talked about how the Chinese tie their social security numbers to their accounts (crazy).
LuKe_NuKeS_Em wrote: » Real money trading (RMT) or buying in game currency with real world money is going to be available to anyone with expendable income.
LuKe_NuKeS_Em wrote: » If you have a legal way to stop people in real life making deals with their own money that affect the game please post below.
LuKe_NuKeS_Em wrote: » How do you prove that a trade in-game was legit or the result of RMT? Is there a tenable solution that the community would find acceptable?
LuKe_NuKeS_Em wrote: » I read one post that talked about how the Chinese tie their social security numbers to their accounts (crazy).
BaSkA13 wrote: » ...computer vision, pattern recognition and machine learning.
LuKe_NuKeS_Em wrote: » Is this the intended solution for Ashes of Creation?
LuKe_NuKeS_Em wrote: » Real money trading (RMT) or buying in game currency with real world money is going to be available to anyone with expendable income. If you have a legal way to stop people in real life making deals with their own money that affect the game please post below.
How do you prove that a trade in-game was legit or the result of RMT?
Is there a tenable solution that the community would find acceptable?
LuKe_NuKeS_Em wrote: » I agree letting the public know the solution would help people counter it. Advertising the game as having no pay to win and not explaining how that is going to be the case isn't ideal either.