Noaani wrote: » VekoCrnogorac wrote: » . If economy is not similar to vanilla WoW then what you going to do with free time? Roam around doing professions for nothing? No, that would be stupid. Vanilla WoWs economy wasnt all that good. If you want a game with a good economy, look at either Archeage or EVE. Either game makes vanilla WoW look like the children's game that it was. People here saying they dont want what WoW had back then aren't saying they dont want a good economy, for the most part they are saying they want a better economy.
VekoCrnogorac wrote: » . If economy is not similar to vanilla WoW then what you going to do with free time? Roam around doing professions for nothing? No, that would be stupid.
NiKr wrote: » At this point I think you're either an intricate bot or just a troll
Arya_Yeshe wrote: » NiKr wrote: » At this point I think you're either an intricate bot or just a troll I have considered he is not a person, but an AI sent by Intrepid, maybe Intrepid is testing an AI that will be in the game and will give quests or do storytelling I don't think anymore that he is a person
The most common way to tell if an account is fake is to check out the profile. The most rudimentary bots lack a photo, a link, or any bio. More sophisticated ones might use a photo stolen from the web, or an automatically generated account name.
Using human language is still incredibly hard for machines. A bot’s tweets may reveal its algorithmic logic: they may be formulaic or repetitive, or use responses common in chatbot programs. Missing an obvious joke and rapidly changing the subject are other telltale traits (unfortunately, they are also quite common among human Twitter users).
Bots are usually created with a particular end in mind, so they may be overly obsessed with a particular topic, perhaps reposting the same link again and again or tweeting about little else.
Looking at tweets over time can also be revealing. If an account tweets at an impossible rate, at unlikely times, or even too regularly, that can be a good sign that it’s fake. Researchers also found that fake accounts often betray an inconsistent attitude toward topics over time.
Azherae wrote: » If that IS a bot, I wanna meet whoever wrote it.
NiKr wrote: » Azherae wrote: » If that IS a bot, I wanna meet whoever wrote it. It might just be the same case as when you said that your gameplay in an mmo can come off as that of a bot's. Maybe Veko's personality is just that close to how an AI would feel. I treated the first few threads and discussions with Veko involved as just a maybe not english native speaker who has had a singular big mmo experience and only had that as their pov. And I thought to myself "hell, that's exactly like me". But the more circular discussions there's been and the more explanations Veko has gotten about other games - literally nothing changed. And not only that, but Veko keeps writing the exact same things in different threads. Now we obviously have several "quirky" people on this forum (me definitely included), but there's gotta be at least some limit to how much a person can avoid understanding information that's been repeated to them time after time. Though maybe that's just my own malleability influencing my pov on people who're not as malleable.
NiKr wrote: » Noaani wrote: » If you want a good example of a game with a simple trade system, but also a good economy, you want Archeage. Btw, Noaani I don't remember if this was discussed in one of these 12 fucking same threads, but what was the situation with consumables in AA? And with their role in the bigger economy of the game. I know that AoC's crafting and economy inspirations might be closer to EVE or SWG, but still. L2's economy was pretty much based on a consumable, so, in case Steven pushes for his own inspirations when discussing these designs, what the situation in AA was?
Noaani wrote: » If you want a good example of a game with a simple trade system, but also a good economy, you want Archeage.
Ehrgeiz wrote: » Noaani wrote: » VekoCrnogorac wrote: » . If economy is not similar to vanilla WoW then what you going to do with free time? Roam around doing professions for nothing? No, that would be stupid. Vanilla WoWs economy wasnt all that good. If you want a game with a good economy, look at either Archeage or EVE. Either game makes vanilla WoW look like the children's game that it was. People here saying they dont want what WoW had back then aren't saying they dont want a good economy, for the most part they are saying they want a better economy. Archeage economy was the worst I ever saw.
VekoCrnogorac wrote: » This is reason why economy should not be bad in AoC... Everything revolves around if gold has worthiness.