mcnasty wrote: » Kilion wrote: » I won't be going on a headstart server either, I want to be there when the land is still untouched. Same. I suspect the vast majority will want to start on a fresh server that doesn't have HS players. It will be interesting to see if the HS servers manage to thrive after launch, or if they are avoided by new players and suffer from under-population.
Kilion wrote: » I won't be going on a headstart server either, I want to be there when the land is still untouched.
Neurath wrote: » You can choose a non headstart server if you are worried.
ShadowVen wrote: » It wouldn't be PTW for those who all start early. To remove the PTW aspect just dont choose that server if you dont have early access. Neurath wrote: » You can choose a non headstart server if you are worried. well obviously i will not be choosing that server, but its not the fact that they get the headstart that bothered me its the fact that its been stated that no pay to win will exist within ashes of creation, even if its the smallest level its still by definition pay to win, for example, you get access to a server for two days before anyone else has a chance, after probably a year of alpha/beta tests the people on this server will know the game inside out for the starting experience its possible to get rare items, rare spawns, and most likely hit level 15-20 within this time frame, im not sure how the game mechanics work as we have not seen much of the game but say for example a mob is lvl 20, on a 3 day spawn timer, that has a 30% chance to drop x item, obviously the people starting early have a huge advantage to getting this, im expecting these servers to be mostly dead servers regardless as no one is going to willingly choose a headstart server without the headstart unless it becomes beneficial to do so with queue times maybe my point however is moving forward this game is advertised as 0 zero nada pay wo win atributes, i dont want things to just start slipping into the game, a day headstart there cosmetics here and all of a sudden theres level boosts and ptw weapons, either way just my thoughts
Chicago wrote: » my point however is moving forward this game is advertised as 0 zero nada pay wo win atributes, i dont want things to just start slipping into the game, a day headstart there cosmetics here and all of a sudden theres level boosts and ptw weapons, either way just my thoughts
NiKr wrote: » Chicago wrote: » my point however is moving forward this game is advertised as 0 zero nada pay wo win atributes, i dont want things to just start slipping into the game, a day headstart there cosmetics here and all of a sudden theres level boosts and ptw weapons, either way just my thoughts Except both headstart and cosmetics were pretty much in the game from the very start. So it's not like they suddenly came out of nowhere and draw a direct line to "this game will 100% become p2w because of this shit".
Chicago wrote: » Well im not saying it draws a line im just saying stating a game will have 0 pay to win features whilst having pay to win features is concerning
Chicago wrote: » well obviously i will not be choosing that server,
Chicago wrote: » its the fact that its been stated that no pay to win will exist within ashes of creation, even if its the smallest level its still by definition pay to win
insomnia wrote: » I get he point. But there will always be people with an advantage. Someone without a job/ school etc. Vs everybody else. A streamer that can play all day, and have people give them things, boost their guild. Work on the node they want etc
NiKr wrote: » mcnasty wrote: » Same. I suspect the vast majority will want to start on a fresh server that doesn't have HS players. It will be interesting to see if the HS servers manage to thrive after launch, or if they are avoided by new players and suffer from under-population. I'd bet they'll be the ones that thrive the most, because while some people will avoid them due to "omg I'm like so behind everyone waahhh", a ton of people would not care about that shit and they'd instead just see a less populated server that has either no queues or just small ones. And with that server being populated by people who don't care about the "race" as much - it'll be more successful in just existing and everyone just enjoying themselves on it.
mcnasty wrote: » Same. I suspect the vast majority will want to start on a fresh server that doesn't have HS players. It will be interesting to see if the HS servers manage to thrive after launch, or if they are avoided by new players and suffer from under-population.
Naeleron wrote: » NiKr wrote: » mcnasty wrote: » Same. I suspect the vast majority will want to start on a fresh server that doesn't have HS players. It will be interesting to see if the HS servers manage to thrive after launch, or if they are avoided by new players and suffer from under-population. I'd bet they'll be the ones that thrive the most, because while some people will avoid them due to "omg I'm like so behind everyone waahhh", a ton of people would not care about that shit and they'd instead just see a less populated server that has either no queues or just small ones. And with that server being populated by people who don't care about the "race" as much - it'll be more successful in just existing and everyone just enjoying themselves on it. So literally pay to win, if they are the "good" servers to be on.
Kilion wrote: » Naeleron wrote: » NiKr wrote: » mcnasty wrote: » Same. I suspect the vast majority will want to start on a fresh server that doesn't have HS players. It will be interesting to see if the HS servers manage to thrive after launch, or if they are avoided by new players and suffer from under-population. I'd bet they'll be the ones that thrive the most, because while some people will avoid them due to "omg I'm like so behind everyone waahhh", a ton of people would not care about that shit and they'd instead just see a less populated server that has either no queues or just small ones. And with that server being populated by people who don't care about the "race" as much - it'll be more successful in just existing and everyone just enjoying themselves on it. So literally pay to win, if they are the "good" servers to be on. There is not much to win when you have 48h head start without the primary game feature being active.
Naeleron wrote: » Kilion wrote: » Naeleron wrote: » NiKr wrote: » mcnasty wrote: » Same. I suspect the vast majority will want to start on a fresh server that doesn't have HS players. It will be interesting to see if the HS servers manage to thrive after launch, or if they are avoided by new players and suffer from under-population. I'd bet they'll be the ones that thrive the most, because while some people will avoid them due to "omg I'm like so behind everyone waahhh", a ton of people would not care about that shit and they'd instead just see a less populated server that has either no queues or just small ones. And with that server being populated by people who don't care about the "race" as much - it'll be more successful in just existing and everyone just enjoying themselves on it. So literally pay to win, if they are the "good" servers to be on. There is not much to win when you have 48h head start without the primary game feature being active. There is infinite difference between "not much" and "zero".
Kilion wrote: » Naeleron wrote: » Kilion wrote: » Naeleron wrote: » NiKr wrote: » mcnasty wrote: » Same. I suspect the vast majority will want to start on a fresh server that doesn't have HS players. It will be interesting to see if the HS servers manage to thrive after launch, or if they are avoided by new players and suffer from under-population. I'd bet they'll be the ones that thrive the most, because while some people will avoid them due to "omg I'm like so behind everyone waahhh", a ton of people would not care about that shit and they'd instead just see a less populated server that has either no queues or just small ones. And with that server being populated by people who don't care about the "race" as much - it'll be more successful in just existing and everyone just enjoying themselves on it. So literally pay to win, if they are the "good" servers to be on. There is not much to win when you have 48h head start without the primary game feature being active. There is infinite difference between "not much" and "zero". How is having 48h in an incomplete game with the primary feature for character and content progression deactivated anywhere close to a "win"? I get the concern but only until one is looking at the available sources. What exactly are these people winning nobody else is having access to?
Naeleron wrote: » Kilion wrote: » Naeleron wrote: » Kilion wrote: » Naeleron wrote: » NiKr wrote: » mcnasty wrote: » Same. I suspect the vast majority will want to start on a fresh server that doesn't have HS players. It will be interesting to see if the HS servers manage to thrive after launch, or if they are avoided by new players and suffer from under-population. I'd bet they'll be the ones that thrive the most, because while some people will avoid them due to "omg I'm like so behind everyone waahhh", a ton of people would not care about that shit and they'd instead just see a less populated server that has either no queues or just small ones. And with that server being populated by people who don't care about the "race" as much - it'll be more successful in just existing and everyone just enjoying themselves on it. So literally pay to win, if they are the "good" servers to be on. There is not much to win when you have 48h head start without the primary game feature being active. There is infinite difference between "not much" and "zero". How is having 48h in an incomplete game with the primary feature for character and content progression deactivated anywhere close to a "win"? I get the concern but only until one is looking at the available sources. What exactly are these people winning nobody else is having access to? You obviously don't get "the concern". Maybe quit redefining P2W, and we can have a meaningful discussion about it.
Naeleron wrote: » You obviously don't get "the concern". Maybe quit redefining P2W, and we can have a meaningful discussion about it.