NiKr wrote: » And I'd definitely like if Ashes had a similar system/design.
Azherae wrote: » frykman_iam wrote: » Why some people going personal in this forum? StrifeLords are a whole demographic.
frykman_iam wrote: » Why some people going personal in this forum?
Neurath wrote: » NiKr wrote: » Neurath wrote: » I'm all for an achievements list. I'm against an activity sheet. Yep, pretty much this. Genshin has achievements that include several different in-game activities and reward you with a small cosmetic (and some gacha currency), but there's no "list" of things to do at any given time. You just play the game and you'll get majority of achievements or meet requirements for the bigger achievement. And once you're done playing in your own way you're free to go look at what the achievement requires and do precisely that. And I'd definitely like if Ashes had a similar system/design. Yeah man, imagine an achievement 'Become Mayor of all node types' and get an absolutely stunning flying mount skin as a reward.
NiKr wrote: » Neurath wrote: » I'm all for an achievements list. I'm against an activity sheet. Yep, pretty much this. Genshin has achievements that include several different in-game activities and reward you with a small cosmetic (and some gacha currency), but there's no "list" of things to do at any given time. You just play the game and you'll get majority of achievements or meet requirements for the bigger achievement. And once you're done playing in your own way you're free to go look at what the achievement requires and do precisely that. And I'd definitely like if Ashes had a similar system/design.
Neurath wrote: » I'm all for an achievements list. I'm against an activity sheet.
Solvryn wrote: » Azherae wrote: » frykman_iam wrote: » Why some people going personal in this forum? StrifeLords are a whole demographic. What the hell is a strifelord? Is this an actual thing?
Azherae wrote: » Solvryn wrote: » Azherae wrote: » frykman_iam wrote: » Why some people going personal in this forum? StrifeLords are a whole demographic. What the hell is a strifelord? Is this an actual thing? A person who values the conflict in human emotion enough to always begin the chance for it if reasonable. Their definitions of 'reasonable' vary. See 'edgelord' as well. You're the forum's most reasonable one, that I know of, as you don't normally make personal attacks, but making personal attacks is a simple and effective method for most such people to get what they want. They normally have an emotionally inflammatory style of communication, and are capable of being eloquent, but have a tendency to choose not to do so. Whether or not this is because they believe that clarity is weakness, because they know that brevity in conversation with an annoyed target will achieve their goal, or that they're just naturally reticent when addressing something they aren't personally passionate about, is unclear and seems to vary. On forums they tend to choose names that give others a cautious impression of them, or imply that they value hostility and conflict, such as 'Depraved', or 'Max_Fury', but they may not actually be direct supportive of this, it might just be another way to provoke conflict. Normally best approached by either not engaging, or by making sure that one hasn't become more invested in whatever clash, than they actually are.
Depraved wrote: » Azherae wrote: » Solvryn wrote: » Azherae wrote: » frykman_iam wrote: » Why some people going personal in this forum? StrifeLords are a whole demographic. What the hell is a strifelord? Is this an actual thing? A person who values the conflict in human emotion enough to always begin the chance for it if reasonable. Their definitions of 'reasonable' vary. See 'edgelord' as well. You're the forum's most reasonable one, that I know of, as you don't normally make personal attacks, but making personal attacks is a simple and effective method for most such people to get what they want. They normally have an emotionally inflammatory style of communication, and are capable of being eloquent, but have a tendency to choose not to do so. Whether or not this is because they believe that clarity is weakness, because they know that brevity in conversation with an annoyed target will achieve their goal, or that they're just naturally reticent when addressing something they aren't personally passionate about, is unclear and seems to vary. On forums they tend to choose names that give others a cautious impression of them, or imply that they value hostility and conflict, such as 'Depraved', or 'Max_Fury', but they may not actually be direct supportive of this, it might just be another way to provoke conflict. Normally best approached by either not engaging, or by making sure that one hasn't become more invested in whatever clash, than they actually are. i dont have anything personal against anyone and my intention isnt to trigger anyone. i attack arguments, not people. but nowdays people get triggered too easily, even with truths and facts. i might not say things the smoothest possible ways, but im tired of protecting everyone elses feelings. we are all grown ups here. ive been insulted and you dont see me crying to mods or insulting back or anything, i dont even acknowledge it. i just attack the argument. if the rule is do not say anything that can offend anyone, then we might all as well delete our accounts and never post again. anything that anyone says might be offensive to somebody, even if its 1 in 100000. nowadays you could say you like pepsi better than coke and someone will get offended, so we cant really abide by that rule of "do not say anything offensive". i dont provoke people, people provoke themselves. also elixir > erlang
Solvryn wrote: » Depraved wrote: » Azherae wrote: » Solvryn wrote: » Azherae wrote: » frykman_iam wrote: » Why some people going personal in this forum? StrifeLords are a whole demographic. What the hell is a strifelord? Is this an actual thing? A person who values the conflict in human emotion enough to always begin the chance for it if reasonable. Their definitions of 'reasonable' vary. See 'edgelord' as well. You're the forum's most reasonable one, that I know of, as you don't normally make personal attacks, but making personal attacks is a simple and effective method for most such people to get what they want. They normally have an emotionally inflammatory style of communication, and are capable of being eloquent, but have a tendency to choose not to do so. Whether or not this is because they believe that clarity is weakness, because they know that brevity in conversation with an annoyed target will achieve their goal, or that they're just naturally reticent when addressing something they aren't personally passionate about, is unclear and seems to vary. On forums they tend to choose names that give others a cautious impression of them, or imply that they value hostility and conflict, such as 'Depraved', or 'Max_Fury', but they may not actually be direct supportive of this, it might just be another way to provoke conflict. Normally best approached by either not engaging, or by making sure that one hasn't become more invested in whatever clash, than they actually are. i dont have anything personal against anyone and my intention isnt to trigger anyone. i attack arguments, not people. but nowdays people get triggered too easily, even with truths and facts. i might not say things the smoothest possible ways, but im tired of protecting everyone elses feelings. we are all grown ups here. ive been insulted and you dont see me crying to mods or insulting back or anything, i dont even acknowledge it. i just attack the argument. if the rule is do not say anything that can offend anyone, then we might all as well delete our accounts and never post again. anything that anyone says might be offensive to somebody, even if its 1 in 100000. nowadays you could say you like pepsi better than coke and someone will get offended, so we cant really abide by that rule of "do not say anything offensive". i dont provoke people, people provoke themselves. also elixir > erlang *shrug* I only ever get a chuckle out of the folks who think they should be changing others views and not their own.
Depraved wrote: » Solvryn wrote: » Depraved wrote: » Azherae wrote: » Solvryn wrote: » Azherae wrote: » frykman_iam wrote: » Why some people going personal in this forum? StrifeLords are a whole demographic. What the hell is a strifelord? Is this an actual thing? A person who values the conflict in human emotion enough to always begin the chance for it if reasonable. Their definitions of 'reasonable' vary. See 'edgelord' as well. You're the forum's most reasonable one, that I know of, as you don't normally make personal attacks, but making personal attacks is a simple and effective method for most such people to get what they want. They normally have an emotionally inflammatory style of communication, and are capable of being eloquent, but have a tendency to choose not to do so. Whether or not this is because they believe that clarity is weakness, because they know that brevity in conversation with an annoyed target will achieve their goal, or that they're just naturally reticent when addressing something they aren't personally passionate about, is unclear and seems to vary. On forums they tend to choose names that give others a cautious impression of them, or imply that they value hostility and conflict, such as 'Depraved', or 'Max_Fury', but they may not actually be direct supportive of this, it might just be another way to provoke conflict. Normally best approached by either not engaging, or by making sure that one hasn't become more invested in whatever clash, than they actually are. i dont have anything personal against anyone and my intention isnt to trigger anyone. i attack arguments, not people. but nowdays people get triggered too easily, even with truths and facts. i might not say things the smoothest possible ways, but im tired of protecting everyone elses feelings. we are all grown ups here. ive been insulted and you dont see me crying to mods or insulting back or anything, i dont even acknowledge it. i just attack the argument. if the rule is do not say anything that can offend anyone, then we might all as well delete our accounts and never post again. anything that anyone says might be offensive to somebody, even if its 1 in 100000. nowadays you could say you like pepsi better than coke and someone will get offended, so we cant really abide by that rule of "do not say anything offensive". i dont provoke people, people provoke themselves. also elixir > erlang *shrug* I only ever get a chuckle out of the folks who think they should be changing others views and not their own. well, nowadays people call you provocative or inflammatory if you disagree with them, and by people i mean the left xD imagine someone says there are 100 genders, then a 2nd person says no there are only 2. Everyone calls the 2nd person inflammatory and provocative, and he also gets insulted (but I guess it's okay to insult if you belong to a certain tribe and as long you aren't getting insulted), just for stating a basic truth or speaking against a lie. That's why I can't take Azherae's comment seriously in this case xD this reminds me of Jordan Peterson. he goes around telling people to clean their room and be a good person. then he gets interviewed, proceeds to dismantle a lie or a bad argument, then the next time he gets interviewed he gets called inflammatory and provocative, then he dismantles another lie, then the next time he gets interviewed he gets called inflammatory and provocative once more. and the cycle keeps repeating. The reason I keep answering is because I refuse to participate in the lie. but I guess that will get me called inflammatory and provocative
CROW3 wrote: » If the game itself can't keep the attention of it's player base, the solution lies in content not coupons and sparkles.
frykman_iam wrote: » Lets say you have really bad RNG and things never drop for you no matter how well you do. Then achievement list, activity sheet or whatever you want to call it would be a nice thing.
Enigmatic Sage wrote: » frykman_iam wrote: » Lets say you have really bad RNG and things never drop for you no matter how well you do. Then achievement list, activity sheet or whatever you want to call it would be a nice thing. it'll have achievements with bells and whistles to let players know how special they are Definitely aids in the dopamine hits and self-esteem.
blktauna wrote: » This sounds like the whole setup of the game so far...
