Glorious Alpha Two Testers!

Alpha Two testing is currently taking place five days each week. More information about Phase II and Phase III testing schedule can be found here

If you have Alpha Two, you can download the game launcher here, and we encourage you to join us on our Official Discord Server for the most up to date testing news.

Why Summoner should be a melee Archetype

BirqaBirqa Member, Alpha Two
We have 8 Archetypes planned.

Current Melee:_____________Current Range:
Tank ____________________ Ranger
Fighter __________________ Mage
(Rogue in stealth) __________Cleric
_________________________Bard

Mmos in general have the issue of being range meta often. to lessen those probabilities its important to have at least the same amount of melee classes as range. To achieve that summoner has to be a melee Archetype. i could see it being similar to rogue with one or two range abilities and the rest melee focus. of course summoner will have the abilities from their summons so i expect there will be melee and range options. same as dps tank heal and utility options.

I am aware that most people think of a summoner as a range class with their pets being melee or range but that would lead to 5 range Archetypes and only 2 and a half melee.

So game design wise: Thats why Summoner should be a melee Archetype!


Im interested in discussing that with everyone here :)
«1

Comments

  • VeeshanVeeshan Member, Alpha Two
    when it comes to secondary though anything that takes a fighter for example might change all their skills to be more melee ordinated

    Just something to take into account

    Also im kinda hoping they make ranger a hybrid range/melee class you have range skills and a bit of melee mixed in (crowfall did rangers the best imo) they had a few melee combos and then range ability ontop of that

  • Veeshan has a point. I think that ur secondary archetype will determine ur range. Probably what type of summon you have active plays a role too. I guess some summons will be ranged and some melee and summoners will cast many spells through their summons.
  • AzheraeAzherae Member, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    I don't understand what this would mean because your main weapon is what determines your range.

    Do you want to force Summoners to not use Wands or Focii? Because even tanks can do that. Wand Tanks dancing around slow enemies is an entire specific way of gaining exp.
    Stellar Devotion.
  • AladaurAladaur Member, Alpha Two
    edited April 4
    if most of a summoner's fighting prowess comes from their summons, and their summons are in melee range, they have the same weakness as melee classes. But making them a COMPLETE melee class would go against the summoner fantasy of being a weak glass cannon. because to be in melee range you need survivability. Unless you want to make a solo leveling Roleplay where the summoner is not a weak class that needs to stay at a range, and is a melee class that has good survivability, then you can read an entire book series called solo leveling or any other necromancer story where the MC steamrolls the entire story.

    Veeshan made a good point, EVERY archetype should have 2 melee variants between the tank/fighter sub archetypes at the least, but choosing mage sub type on a fighter wont make you a caster.
  • LudulluLudullu Member, Alpha Two
    Azherae wrote: »
    Wand Tanks dancing around slow enemies is an entire specific way of gaining exp.
    That do be me. EXCEPT I WANT MY FUCKING SHIELD AT THE SAME TIME, STEVEEEEEEN!!! :angry:
  • REHOCREHOC Member
    I see your point, and it's definitely an interesting design angle. Having a balanced number of melee and ranged archetypes could help prevent a ranged-dominated meta.

    Personally though, I wouldn't take the risk of turning Summoner into a melee archetype. Many players, myself included, imagine Summoner as a ranged or mid-range class that commands from a distance while their summons do the frontline work.

    It’s a tricky balance, and in the end, only the devs know what direction they’re aiming for in terms of combat roles and class identity. I’m really curious to see what they come up with.

    Cool topic to think about either way!
    9ogtbxoqmpef.png
  • BirqaBirqa Member, Alpha Two
    In general: "Summoners can shift their roles easily to fill gaps in a group's composition based on the role of the summon they are utilizing coupled with their choice of secondary archetype, which influences the role the summons perform best at." (Ashes Wiki)

    so to answer some of the comments, by the way thanks for the input, i assume that in a best case scenario summoner will be the archetype that can be melee or range depending on their summons.
    "Abilities from the summon appear on the summoner's hotbar"

    having 4 archetypes for melee and range each would also influence the class building since you would have 4 options for secondaries to get some melee or range capabilities together with their augmentation schools.
    if your character is ranged or melee comes from the abilities @Azherae. you can use a range weapon with any character but killing something with only auto attacks vs having abilities to help with that is a massive difference.

    as for class fantasy. thats why i had this sentence in my original post already: I am aware that most people think of a summoner as a range class with their pets being melee or range but that would lead to 5 range Archetypes and only 2 and a half melee.
    i would love summoner to be the hybrid that can fit all roles, only one at a time, so we could have them in melee and range. but game design wise i disagree with myself ;)

    at the end i agree with what @REHOC said: "It’s a tricky balance, and in the end, only the devs know what direction they’re aiming for in terms of combat roles and class identity. I’m really curious to see what they come up with"

    lets hope they cook something reeeeaal cool for us <3


    thx again for all the input :)
  • NoaaniNoaani Member, Intrepid Pack, Alpha Two
    Making the Summoner melee because it fulfill some OCD notion that there needs to be 4 ranged and 4 melee classes seems ill considered.

    Even just the difference in how much space there is for players around a target vs how much space there is for players within casting range of a target should tell you that the kotion of balancing melee and caster is a foolish notion to even consider, let alone design around.
  • ShadowcrushersShadowcrushers Member, Alpha Two
    Every archetype is both melee and ranged, the difference is depending on playstyle a cleric can easily play frontline, they just need a bit more heavy gear to be a bit more tanky, but because of this they will naturally heal less, but have more defensives and health, the same goes for any other class, it mainly depends on playstyle and very little about skills in the end thats why every class can use any type of gear in the game aswell as weapons so you can mix and mash to your liking
  • AzheraeAzherae Member, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    My other question to this thread would be... why are we treating Bards as 'Ranged'?
    Stellar Devotion.
  • BirqaBirqa Member, Alpha Two
    @Shadowcrushers : so in your opinion you would be fine with ur tank just auto attacking from range and never use skills by they cant and thats an intended playstyle? pls expand on it since i dont really see how that would be feasible.

    @Azherae : bards dances are like midrange while most targeted skills are ranged so theres not much incetive to get in melee to be hit more easily. in my experience, when you can play something in range or melee people tend to choose range most of the time.

    i would also be totally fine with bards skills being changed in range so they become more incentivised to be melee so summoner can be that range fantasy.
    my whole point is still just that mmos tend to have a ranged meta and they suffer from it.

    really nice to have this conversation ongoing btw :)
  • ShadowcrushersShadowcrushers Member, Alpha Two
    @Birqa well the game is intended to make every playstyle possible, but some would benefit more from a more specific playstyle than others for example ranger would benefit from range, casters would benefit from range, tanks and other melee designed archetypes benefit more from being up melee cuz of their skills, but again the game still intend for every playstyle for every archetype to be viable in some way
  • willsummonwillsummon Member, Alpha Two
    edited April 19
    The two styles of game play currently missing in AoC are damage over time caster and pet master. The Summoner would fill both roles well.

    Keep in mind that the three primary melee play styles are already present.

    The defensive melee, the Tank.

    The pure melee, the Fighter.

    The stealth melee, the Rogue.

    Side note. Both the Cleric and the Bard offer some hybrid caster and melee options.
  • XeegXeeg Member, Alpha Two
    Birqa wrote: »
    We have 8 Archetypes planned.

    Current Melee:_____________Current Range:
    Tank ____________________ Ranger
    Fighter __________________ Mage
    (Rogue in stealth) __________Cleric
    _________________________Bard

    Mmos in general have the issue of being range meta often. to lessen those probabilities its important to have at least the same amount of melee classes as range. To achieve that summoner has to be a melee Archetype. i could see it being similar to rogue with one or two range abilities and the rest melee focus. of course summoner will have the abilities from their summons so i expect there will be melee and range options. same as dps tank heal and utility options.

    I am aware that most people think of a summoner as a range class with their pets being melee or range but that would lead to 5 range Archetypes and only 2 and a half melee.

    So game design wise: Thats why Summoner should be a melee Archetype!


    Im interested in discussing that with everyone here :)

    Yeah man this is a cool idea. Puts the summoner in melee with his pets or maybe even tanking for them. I assume there will be some range pets anyways. He can always use a wand or bow just like anyone else, but only have a couple range abilities. More melee cleave abilities or touch abilities for his pets even? Maybe pet teleports could help with mobility.
  • BirqaBirqa Member, Alpha Two
    edited April 23
    willsummon wrote: »
    The two styles of game play currently missing in AoC are damage over time caster and pet master. The Summoner would fill both roles well.

    Keep in mind that the three primary melee play styles are already present.

    The defensive melee, the Tank.

    The pure melee, the Fighter.

    The stealth melee, the Rogue.

    Side note. Both the Cleric and the Bard offer some hybrid caster and melee options.

    im all for dots on summoner. imagine spirit breath and a skill that lets u jump on your pet to charge into your enemy like @Xeeg mentioned. sounds really fun. wear them down with all your debuffs :)
  • willsummonwillsummon Member, Alpha Two
    edited April 24
    Birqa wrote: »
    im all for dots on summoner. imagine spirit breath and a skill that lets u jump on your pet to charge into your enemy like @Xeeg mentioned. sounds really fun. wear them down with all your debuffs :)

    I can see that with the Brood Warden, Summoner/Tank class. A guess that is the bug summoning class.

    Since as a Brood Warden the Summoner takes on some of the Tank features, one idea would be a Brood Warden summons a large, powerful bug to mount and be a direct tank while riding that large bug.
  • SmileGurneySmileGurney Member, Alpha Two
    I would like to see some melee focused magic users, but I'm not sure if Summoner specifically is the best idea. Also, not like it matters that much, a plain summoner in most RPG systems tends to a ranged magic user with pets.
    My lungs taste the air of Time,
    Blown past falling sands…
  • BirqaBirqa Member, Alpha Two
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WASBctxQ2Fk
    just linking the little unconfirmed leaks that we got so far.

    does that sound more melee or range, what do you think?
  • ButkusButkus Member, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    Veeshan wrote: »
    when it comes to secondary though anything that takes a fighter for example might change all their skills to be more melee ordinated

    Just something to take into account

    Also im kinda hoping they make ranger a hybrid range/melee class you have range skills and a bit of melee mixed in (crowfall did rangers the best imo) they had a few melee combos and then range ability ontop of that

    I can this as well. Summoner/fighter acting like a white lion from Warhammer or Summoner/rogue being a melee with a pet.
  • SmileGurneySmileGurney Member, Alpha Two
    Birqa wrote: »
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WASBctxQ2Fk
    just linking the little unconfirmed leaks that we got so far.

    does that sound more melee or range, what do you think?
    Very little is known about the Summoner, but that alone would suggest a ranged class: a channelled ranged ability which applies snare.
    My lungs taste the air of Time,
    Blown past falling sands…
  • BirqaBirqa Member, Alpha Two
    Birqa wrote: »

    does that sound more melee or range, what do you think?
    Very little is known about the Summoner, but that alone would suggest a ranged class: a channelled ranged ability which applies snare.

    if its similar to the mage beam its midrange with like 15m. i agree though that its a bad sign ;)
    i like the snare ^^

    the dot ability could be both but withe the beam together probably range. maybe they could make it a multiple choice where its either ranged or melee but melee gets more dmg or lifesteal or some statuseffect etc :)
  • AuldrakarAuldrakar Member, Alpha Two
    True Summoners want Summoner to be a mage-like archetype, let's be real.
    6au0fcq9yhle.png
  • AzheraeAzherae Member, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    Auldrakar wrote: »
    True Summoners want Summoner to be a mage-like archetype, let's be real.

    No True Summoner wants to cut or punch things! Except mine, cause she's awesome... and every other Summoner I've ever seen, because I played a game like that. And most fans of things like Solo Leveling. And...

    Wait...
    Stellar Devotion.
  • AuldrakarAuldrakar Member, Alpha Two
    Azherae wrote: »
    Auldrakar wrote: »
    True Summoners want Summoner to be a mage-like archetype, let's be real.

    No True Summoner wants to cut or punch things! Except mine, cause she's awesome... and every other Summoner I've ever seen, because I played a game like that. And most fans of things like Solo Leveling. And...

    Wait...

    Nah, all the good pet classes are mage-like. There's no good melee pet class.
    6au0fcq9yhle.png
  • VaknarVaknar Member, Staff
    Great conversation here :)

    Good point, @Azherae, on being able to lean into range or melee through weapon choice. As @Veeshan pointed out, secondary classes could offer interesting ways of choosing predominantly ranged or melee builds!
    community_management.gif
  • AzheraeAzherae Member, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    Auldrakar wrote: »
    Azherae wrote: »
    Auldrakar wrote: »
    True Summoners want Summoner to be a mage-like archetype, let's be real.

    No True Summoner wants to cut or punch things! Except mine, cause she's awesome... and every other Summoner I've ever seen, because I played a game like that. And most fans of things like Solo Leveling. And...

    Wait...

    Nah, all the good pet classes are mage-like. There's no good melee pet class.

    Well obv just going 'nuh uh' or even providing reference isn't going to sway you, but I provide it anyway.

    https://ffxiclopedia.fandom.com/wiki/Puppetmaster

    I'll assume you would consider this also not good, and that's fine, to each their own.
    Stellar Devotion.
  • willsummonwillsummon Member, Alpha Two
    Azherae wrote: »
    Auldrakar wrote: »
    True Summoners want Summoner to be a mage-like archetype, let's be real.

    No True Summoner wants to cut or punch things! Except mine, cause she's awesome... and every other Summoner I've ever seen, because I played a game like that. And most fans of things like Solo Leveling. And...

    Wait...
    The class system will allow for 15 flavors of Summoners. When the class system is finished and released you will likely find one you are happy with.

    Like it or now, AoC is still missing the DoT and pet Archetype(s). The Summoner could fill both roles.
  • AuldrakarAuldrakar Member, Alpha Two
    Azherae wrote: »
    Auldrakar wrote: »
    Azherae wrote: »
    Auldrakar wrote: »
    True Summoners want Summoner to be a mage-like archetype, let's be real.

    No True Summoner wants to cut or punch things! Except mine, cause she's awesome... and every other Summoner I've ever seen, because I played a game like that. And most fans of things like Solo Leveling. And...

    Wait...

    Nah, all the good pet classes are mage-like. There's no good melee pet class.

    Well obv just going 'nuh uh' or even providing reference isn't going to sway you, but I provide it anyway.

    https://ffxiclopedia.fandom.com/wiki/Puppetmaster

    I'll assume you would consider this also not good, and that's fine, to each their own.

    What the akshual hell am I even looking at? What is that thing?
    6au0fcq9yhle.png
  • AszkalonAszkalon Member, Alpha Two
    Auldrakar wrote: »
    True Summoners want Summoner to be a mage-like archetype, let's be real.

    Yes, my fellow Necromancer ... ... ... >:)
    a50whcz343yn.png
    ✓ Occasional Roleplayer
    I am in the guildless Guild so to say, lol. But i won't give up. I will find my fitting Guild "one Day".
  • BirqaBirqa Member, Alpha Two
    in case anyone missed it i wanted to provide the summoner info that steven posted in a video format for you as additional input:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-GYUj1El0cQ summoner info

    as well as quick video about the four summoner classes in L2
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8tqWSfsQIR4&amp;t=254s l2 summoners

    i have no idea about the L2 summoners but one seems to be mostly melee oriented. if someone played L2 and could provide some insights. that would be great.

    movement from summons:
    other than that i thought about the summon ai. especially since some of them are looking real melee based.
    two examples: if an enemy climbes onto a rock with the mantle that characters can use, how or is the summon be able to follow and keep attacking.
    second example: if i jump from one rock to another using space + dodge, how or is my summon able to follow me.
    to get those interactions right is imo really important to make the summoner a viable but not overpowered archetype. id be interested in your thoughts

    and btw: a true summoner is divers enough to not let others decide their role or range for them ;)
Sign In or Register to comment.