Laetitian

Massive hyperbole. Zerging would just *have an impact.* If one side has 300 supporters and the other has 250, that will *have an impact.* It *won't decide who wins.* If the 250 side has the advantage… (View Post)

If you stay this stuck in the grinder mindset, you just won't get it. You know your version of justice/fairness is tainted if you're willing to sacrifice the enjoyability of the general gameplay for … (View Post)

In what dystopian nightmare is gameplay a "handout"? The richer players on the winning side can still be the ones who get to cash in all the rewards for their investment, that's not a deter… (View Post)

It's very simple: All players should be able to have agency and impact on developments in the game. Tryhards should have more impact. But a tryhard shouldn't have 100% of potential impact on the stat… (View Post)

why they should get access to the most rewarding content? Because content =/= reward; content is just ... the game. The rewards of owning and controlling the castle and nodes can be 100% left to the … (View Post)