What is going to be your first and second archetype combinations you will try?

ArchivedUser

Mine will be:
Tank/Summoner - for a monster on the battlefield and to have a partner always with me to either deal damage or assist in protecting my team.

Tank/Bard - to both defend and buff my team so people will think twice before screwing with my team

and yes before the comments roll in I main support in pretty much every game I play such as, League of Legends, Tera, Destiny, Last chaos, Smite, and Neverwinter.

ArchivedUser

This is like asking me what is the back up college my kid is choosing, before it's even conceived.

Too early to tell.

ArchivedUser

Going in with what you usually play or what sounds interesting is a great place to start though. You can't tell me you haven't thought of some combinations you are looking forward to.

ArchivedUser

Either Fighter/Tank or Fighter/Rogue, depending on the abilities you get from your secondary classes and how they will actually impact PvP.

I guess Fighter/Tank is what I will go for, as defense is usually what DPS classes are lacking. The missing dps you might get from choosing rogue as your secondary class can be made up with a high weapon enhancement.

ArchivedUser

An idea I had that would probably be horrible but hilarious in pvp:

Tank/Rogue or Tank/Ranger just with primary being tank then a dps secondary I think would be utterly ridiculous

ArchivedUser

whitedude31 said:

An idea I had that would probably be horrible but hilarious in pvp:

Tank/Rogue or Tank/Ranger just with primary being tank then a dps secondary I think would be utterly ridiculous

Not ridiculous, but certainly annoying to fight against. Does little damage, but still enough so you can't just ignore it. When you try to kill it, it's like fighting against a concrete wall.

ArchivedUser

Too early to tell but knowing what I know at this point, probably Cleric/Cleric maybe Cleric/bard.

ArchivedUser

tbh i always played melee classes, most of my alts are as well in most games.


This time however i will be going for the ranger type and augment it with either rogue elements ... or personal body guard summoner and see how those combo's play.  

ArchivedUser

A mage/summoner is something that sounds super annoying as well XD

A mage that can have a protective partner . . . nope needs to be auto-banned :l

ArchivedUser

I've waited and waited for a game to pull off Spellsword correctly, so I think I'll try Mage + Fighter first of course. 

My secondary would need to be an elemental tank of sorts, so Tank + Mage? It sounds like a nice idea. Tank + Summoner seems as though it could be a quirky but effective playstyle too..

ArchivedUser

Mage + Mage

Mage + Cleric 

Mage + Summoner

ArchivedUser

Rouge / Mage. I'd love to get a teleport augment for some stealth skills, Nightcrawler anyone?

ArchivedUser

First will be tank/cleric so a paladin as for a second character not a single second has been spent thinking about it TBH.

ArchivedUser

Rogue/?
Mage/?
Ranger/?

second class totaly depends on the benefits i'll get

ArchivedUser

Going with a Fighter/Rogue combo cause I wanna see if that style could fit my playstyle like a "rogue knight" if you must say but if that doesn't work maybe a Fighter/Ranger or Fighter/Fighter type.

ArchivedUser

Spell Sword!!!!!! 

Fighter/Mage 

Fuck yeah

ArchivedUser

Summoner-summoner 
Summoner- mage
Summoner-cleric

whatever allows me to play as a necromancer 

ArchivedUser

Rogue-rogue
Rogue-mage
Rogue-cleric
Rogue-tank

and so on xD

ArchivedUser

I've always loved a magic user who mastered the magic of the elements, fire, earth, air, water, the shamans of WoW. As of yet I've no clue what routes you can go down with a have but if I could get that mix that's what I'd strive for. 

Will deffo be trying a Cleric/mage too! 

ArchivedUser

I suspect mage & Summoner will be a very popular secondary archetype.

ArchivedUser

Kratz said:

I suspect mage & Summoner will be a very popular secondary archetype.

I think you may be right still can't wait for some more info on the summoner 

ArchivedUser

summoner/bard or summoner/cleric.  I want to be my own band or have my undead minions shamble to my horrible music and tell me it's good anyway.

ArchivedUser

Summoner+Mage
Summoner+Cleric
Summoner+Summoner

ArchivedUser

Rogue + Mage  
Mage + Rogue
Rogue + Summoner
Summoner + Rogue

ArchivedUser

Monk (Mage+Cleric)
Paladin(Tank + Cleric)
Conjurer (Summoner + Cleric)
Bishop(Rogue + Cleric)
Healer(Cleric + Cleric)
You get the point....

ArchivedUser

Rogue/cleric because d&d 3.0 wouldn't let me many years ago.

Ranger/fighter so if I max him out I can sit by a lake and fish while waiting for the stupid to test me in pvp

ArchivedUser

Ranger/Summoner 

ArchivedUser

Easy for me pure healer

ArchivedUser

Tank + Summoner
Summoner +Tank
Could be interesting...

ArchivedUser

First to try will be Summoner/Bard combo mostly to check out how unique summoner will be and at the same time learn the basics + progression. Most likely will main rogue or fighter main archetype, but it's hard to say until we can see the actual skills in alpha. It might turn out that I prefer ranged in this game, hard to tell atm.

ArchivedUser

Summoner-Summoner and then either a tank or a healer or both.