"When you pick the Cleric as a secondary class, two of the augments are Life and Death, basically. And choosing Life augments on certain skills will have the ability to both potentially impact others to a degree and give them life-giving benefits to a degree -through your skills- and also provide healing benefits for yourself through your skills. So, pretty much any class that is going to choose Cleric as a secondary class will have the ability to pick from those augments to influence their skills and to affect the lives of others around you...and yourself."
---Steven
On the earlier comment again yes i have done work around the industry for 15 years also the alpha 2 will not run like other alpha's have before Steven said "it will run up the LAUNCH with secondaries added by the Beta window mid way through alpha 2 testing", So there is no big window like your thinking of without a delay personally fine with delays but others are not!! and again it is what Steven and team have said that has started to Counter their own comments and terms used to explain things..... But moving on: What many of us noted when Steven answered he did what many Business people would do avoiding directly answering and by using words like: "BASICALLY", "POTENTIALLY", "PRETTY MUCH" and "TO A DEGREE" that allow the team LOTS of flex in what he has been saying and even in the LAST livestream countered comments he made in 2018 which is what prompted me to make this post.
I respect the team and the hard work they are putting into the game BUT i also want even a little be of show for the community willing waiting for a game where many things said have already been changed! And ill put it this way just to be clear i am committed to making this all work: @Steven Sharif Can you share 4 abilities each from a different Class and show us this Ability and Augment combos? That with 4 class X 4 Augments should be able to show 16 combinations as a WIP teaser for things to come? many want to see just how different each Ability and Augment combo is...... Cause currently we are getting mixed signals and arguing faction that each heard you differently!!
This and explaining as you said that adding augments does not change the core class role??? pleasse
0
Options
DygzMember, Braver of Worlds, Kickstarter, Alpha One
also the alpha 2 will not run like other alpha's have before Steven said "it will run up the LAUNCH with secondaries added by the Beta window mid way through alpha 2 testing", So there is no big window like your thinking of without a delay personally fine with delays but others are not!!
Please post the source for that quote. Looks like an attempt at a paraphrase to me. And that "paraphrase" makes no sense.
How can an Alpha run up the "launch"? And how can there be a "Beta window mid way through alpha 2 testing"?
I am not thinking about a "big window", whatever that is. The devs are not going to say it's too late to make changes to the secondary archetype system before external testing of that system. The last release schedule we saw states that Alpha 2 is when external testing for the secondary archetype system. So, it makes no sense for the devs to say, "It's too late to make changes to the secondary archetype system." The devs are not going to say that before a considerable amount of external testing has occurred.
But moving on: What many of us noted when Steven answered he did what many Business people would do avoiding directly answering and by using words like: "BASICALLY", "POTENTIALLY", "PRETTY MUCH" and "TO A DEGREE" that allow the team LOTS of flex in what he has been saying and even in the LAST livestream countered comments he made in 2018 which is what prompted me to make this post.
When Steven answered what, specifically?
Many of us already know that Steven is now resigned to delays in the schedule, which is why the team is very reluctant to provide dates before they are sure they can meet those dates. Currently, the team hopes to give us a heads up about one week before delivery.
I respect the team and the hard work they are putting into the game BUT i also want even a little be of show for the community willing waiting for a game where many things said have already been changed! And ill put it this way just to be clear i am committed to making this all work: @Steven Sharif Can you share 4 abilities each from a different Class and show us this Ability and Augment combos? That with 4 class X 4 Augments should be able to show 16 combinations as a WIP teaser for things to come? many want to see just how different each Ability and Augment combo is...... Cause currently we are getting mixed signals and arguing faction that each heard you differently!!
This and explaining as you said that adding augments does not change the core class role??? please
Ha. That's basically the summary I posted as my first response to the original post.
Articles about the classes are supposed to be provided after the Know Your Nodes series is completed, but there is already a 6 month delay for the 3rd article in that series, so... don't hold your breath waiting for articles about the MMORPG classes.
I expect to see articles about the Castle Siege Class Kits first - possible we could get all of those in one article.
I expect the devs to start with one article per month for Tank, Ranger, Cleric and Mage. Which means, we will most likely have to wait 6 months before we get an article for Fighter, Rogue, Bard or Summoner. IS couldn't even stay on schedule for the quarterly Creative Director's Letter - they skipped the Q3 letter.
It's possible that they could speed up delivery of articles to once a week or once every other week. But, Steven has been holding up the Divine Nodes article for months due to significant tweaks in the designs for Divine Nodes and Military Nodes... I wouldn't be surprised at something similar occurring with articles about classes. I also expect to see articles before being shown gameplay.
But, yeah, Steven has been learning to not make statements that can be misconstrued as promises. And some designs have been tweaked in 2019. Subclass affecting stat progression is one of the tweaks mentioned in the last dev livestream, IIRC.
0
Options
VirtekMember, Phoenix Initiative, Royalty, Kickstarter, Alpha One
Adding a Cleric / Fighter / Mage to a Prime class say Tank does not increase DPS!!
Same goes for adding each class together it does not change it but adds a "Buff" of sorts!
Sadly for me this means if your are a Class you will ALWAYS choose from the same list of abilities,
Always fill the same role as the prime / core class you picked there is very little flex in the idea,
adding augments does not alter the ability like people think or it would be fine but still not the case!
Unless something has changed since the last time I asked Steven to clarify this point when everyone went down the wrong road with their thoughts:
Steven has confirmed that anyone with "Tank" in their name will be viable as a tank, to one degree or another. This includes Tank/XXX as well as XXX/Tank
The augmenting class will have a direct impact upon the skills. One example he provided was with Tank doing a grapple hook skill to pull an enemy towards him/her. With certain secondary class augments, it would become an AoE pull. That is a MASSIVE change to that skill. HUGE reason to choose that secondary class.
If all of the above applies to Tank, it would be only logical that the exact same applies to all other classes.
i.e. (using your example list):
Tank - Anyone with Tank primary/secondary will have some Defensive & control (Tank Duh)
Cleric - Anyone with Cleric primary/secondary will have some Life conversion (Healer)
Bard - Anyone with Bard primary/secondary will have some Manipulation (Buff/healer)
Fighter - Anyone with Fighter primary/secondary will have some Mobile sustained Melee
Rogue - Anyone with Rogue primary/secondary will have some Deceptive Burst Melee
Mage - Anyone with Mage primary/secondary will have some Elemental Range (Possibly AoE Based)
Ranger - Anyone with Ranger primary/secondary will have some Cunning Range (Focuses / traps)
Summoner - Anyone with Summoner primary/secondary will have some role that changes every time someone asks
As has been mentioned, I think that adds plenty of diversity to classes. You, essentially, have 8 core tanks, with 7 kinda off tanks. Out of 64 "class combinations," 15 can tank to one degree or another. 23% of the class choices can tank, many of which can also perform other role tasks to similar effectiveness.
I like that type of variety, personally. You can choose to dilute your effectiveness on any certain role to provide more flavor and utility.
Adding a Cleric / Fighter / Mage to a Prime class say Tank does not increase DPS!!
Same goes for adding each class together it does not change it but adds a "Buff" of sorts!
Sadly for me this means if your are a Class you will ALWAYS choose from the same list of abilities,
Always fill the same role as the prime / core class you picked there is very little flex in the idea,
adding augments does not alter the ability like people think or it would be fine but still not the case!
Unless something has changed since the last time I asked Steven to clarify this point when everyone went down the wrong road with their thoughts:
Steven has confirmed that anyone with "Tank" in their name will be viable as a tank, to one degree or another. This includes Tank/XXX as well as XXX/Tank
The augmenting class will have a direct impact upon the skills. One example he provided was with Tank doing a grapple hook skill to pull an enemy towards him/her. With certain secondary class augments, it would become an AoE pull. That is a MASSIVE change to that skill. HUGE reason to choose that secondary class.
If all of the above applies to Tank, it would be only logical that the exact same applies to all other classes.
i.e. (using your example list):
Tank - Anyone with Tank primary/secondary will have some Defensive & control (Tank Duh)
Cleric - Anyone with Cleric primary/secondary will have some Life conversion (Healer)
Bard - Anyone with Bard primary/secondary will have some Manipulation (Buff/healer)
Fighter - Anyone with Fighter primary/secondary will have some Mobile sustained Melee
Rogue - Anyone with Rogue primary/secondary will have some Deceptive Burst Melee
Mage - Anyone with Mage primary/secondary will have some Elemental Range (Possibly AoE Based)
Ranger - Anyone with Ranger primary/secondary will have some Cunning Range (Focuses / traps)
Summoner - Anyone with Summoner primary/secondary will have some role that changes every time someone asks
As has been mentioned, I think that adds plenty of diversity to classes. You, essentially, have 8 core tanks, with 7 kinda off tanks. Out of 64 "class combinations," 15 can tank to one degree or another. 23% of the class choices can tank, many of which can also perform other role tasks to similar effectiveness.
I like that type of variety, personally. You can choose to dilute your effectiveness on any certain role to provide more flavor and utility.
NO in fact he has said the complete opposite to people also... ONLY Primaries have roles not secondaries!
- Core abilities that define a tank, healer, mage, rogue are not transferred via Sub classes..... Steven said "we will have to limit what is shared in subclasses or it will just be every going DPS + Support and DPS + Tank for dungeons and raids that everyone picking the most OP combo for PvE and PvP so no there will be limits like only 10% of the augments added by cleric will heal the others with be thematically Life and Death benefits that are not healing"
But that's ok cause remember as people KEEP DMing me "EVERYTHING IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE" so until Intrepid commits "On paper" nothing is right either way..... also love those that DM me on fake discord accounts and dont face me on here.. (not directed at you all here just wish some people would grow up)
0
Options
DygzMember, Braver of Worlds, Kickstarter, Alpha One
edited December 2019
That is not an actual Steven quote.
Makes no sense to state that only primaries have roles. Secondary archetype means there can be secondary role if you don't double-down on your primary role by choosing the same archetype twice.
Active skills are not gained when choosing a secondary archetype, but a Tank/Cleric gains augments that can Heal and a Tank/Rogue gains augments that allow them to Stealth.
What a character can do with with an augment is a lesser degree than what can be done with an active skill - which is why Virtek said that those who choose Tank as secondary archetype can tank to some degree...which means they can off-tank to some degree.
The only way that can change is to not have secondary archetypes at all... which pretty much negates a core pillar of the game design.
1
Options
nightragnerMember, Braver of Worlds, Kickstarter, Alpha One
That is not an actual Steven quote.
Makes no sense to state that only primaries have roles. Secondary archetype means there can be secondary role if you don't double-down on your primary role by choosing the same archetype twice.
Active skills are not gained when choosing a secondary archetype, but a Tank/Cleric gains augments that can Heal and a Tank/Rogue gains augments that allow them to Stealth.
What a character can do with with an augment is a lesser degree than what can be done with an active skill - which is why Virtek said that those who choose Tank as secondary archetype can tank to some degree...which means they can off-tank to some degree.
The only way that can change is to not have secondary archetypes at all... which pretty much negates a core pillar of the game design.
Again that is the point of this Theory Craft / Hypothetical topic due to the nature of the ever evolving classes and that Steven has said to us while play Civ5 in VC these things which put previous statements as something many heard as incorrect including the old "Big topic Mage/ Tank can tank" in stream to then later say that "the augments of tank add survival and control affixes to the current mages abilities and possible a survival/control passive" and again You / Me and others all stated the way that works and we all want it the same way... like in the old post please intrepid prove me wrong cause every one of us can scream and say shit until we are blue in the face but that will be for nothing thinking it is "A" if in fact it is going to be "B" and worse is the when we find out..... but you will keep going back and commenting cause there is not way in hell i am right about any of this....... well then i hope i am made out to be an idiot by @Steven Sharif and the Intrepid team cause that is 1 Million times better than may concerns being facts !! Keep up the good work everyone at Intrepid AND in the community!!!!
0
Options
poisonzMember, Phoenix Initiative, Royalty, Kickstarter, Alpha One
i agree
1
Options
poisonzMember, Phoenix Initiative, Royalty, Kickstarter, Alpha One
but who did i agree with FEELSTHINKINGMAN!
1
Options
DygzMember, Braver of Worlds, Kickstarter, Alpha One
I don't think anyone has said that Mage/Tank can tank like a primary Tank.
Rather people have said that Mage/Tank can off-tank to some degree. A tank control augment affixing to the current Mage abilities and Spellshield possibly gaining a control passive is not new or contradictory info.
Tank/Mage will be a viable primary Tank.
Mage/Tank will be able to off-Tank to some degree due to having some augments that, when affixed to a Mage ability, will also utilize some control effects.
10% of Secondary Cleric augments healing others is not really new info - other than that's probably higher than I originally expected. I have never expected a Secondary Cleric to be as good at healing as a Primary Cleric. Even having one augment that can heal others has always been good enough.
Sounds to me that whatever Steven said in Civ5 voice chat is not contradictory info.
If there is contradictory info, that's going to add months to the schedule of releasing info on classes.
Especially since, if what you believe is true, the devs would have to spend time re-naming the majority of the class list.
Personally i think the best thing the can do in this case is to steal some things from archeage.
Combos while doing certain actions feel very good to use, and sub class should have a noticeable impact on what you do, not just the same but with different types of damage.
For example, use a water spell and then lightning to increase the overall damage, and make it aoe, things like that.
I also think that they should allow to respect secondary class without any problems.
Comments
Please post the source for that quote. Looks like an attempt at a paraphrase to me. And that "paraphrase" makes no sense.
How can an Alpha run up the "launch"? And how can there be a "Beta window mid way through alpha 2 testing"?
I am not thinking about a "big window", whatever that is. The devs are not going to say it's too late to make changes to the secondary archetype system before external testing of that system. The last release schedule we saw states that Alpha 2 is when external testing for the secondary archetype system. So, it makes no sense for the devs to say, "It's too late to make changes to the secondary archetype system." The devs are not going to say that before a considerable amount of external testing has occurred.
You assert that without citing actual dev quotes along with adequate context.
When Steven answered what, specifically?
Many of us already know that Steven is now resigned to delays in the schedule, which is why the team is very reluctant to provide dates before they are sure they can meet those dates. Currently, the team hopes to give us a heads up about one week before delivery.
Ha. That's basically the summary I posted as my first response to the original post.
Articles about the classes are supposed to be provided after the Know Your Nodes series is completed, but there is already a 6 month delay for the 3rd article in that series, so... don't hold your breath waiting for articles about the MMORPG classes.
I expect to see articles about the Castle Siege Class Kits first - possible we could get all of those in one article.
I expect the devs to start with one article per month for Tank, Ranger, Cleric and Mage. Which means, we will most likely have to wait 6 months before we get an article for Fighter, Rogue, Bard or Summoner. IS couldn't even stay on schedule for the quarterly Creative Director's Letter - they skipped the Q3 letter.
It's possible that they could speed up delivery of articles to once a week or once every other week. But, Steven has been holding up the Divine Nodes article for months due to significant tweaks in the designs for Divine Nodes and Military Nodes... I wouldn't be surprised at something similar occurring with articles about classes. I also expect to see articles before being shown gameplay.
But, yeah, Steven has been learning to not make statements that can be misconstrued as promises. And some designs have been tweaked in 2019. Subclass affecting stat progression is one of the tweaks mentioned in the last dev livestream, IIRC.
Unless something has changed since the last time I asked Steven to clarify this point when everyone went down the wrong road with their thoughts:
Steven has confirmed that anyone with "Tank" in their name will be viable as a tank, to one degree or another. This includes Tank/XXX as well as XXX/Tank
The augmenting class will have a direct impact upon the skills. One example he provided was with Tank doing a grapple hook skill to pull an enemy towards him/her. With certain secondary class augments, it would become an AoE pull. That is a MASSIVE change to that skill. HUGE reason to choose that secondary class.
If all of the above applies to Tank, it would be only logical that the exact same applies to all other classes.
i.e. (using your example list):
Tank - Anyone with Tank primary/secondary will have some Defensive & control (Tank Duh)
Cleric - Anyone with Cleric primary/secondary will have some Life conversion (Healer)
Bard - Anyone with Bard primary/secondary will have some Manipulation (Buff/healer)
Fighter - Anyone with Fighter primary/secondary will have some Mobile sustained Melee
Rogue - Anyone with Rogue primary/secondary will have some Deceptive Burst Melee
Mage - Anyone with Mage primary/secondary will have some Elemental Range (Possibly AoE Based)
Ranger - Anyone with Ranger primary/secondary will have some Cunning Range (Focuses / traps)
Summoner - Anyone with Summoner primary/secondary will have some role that changes every time someone asks
As has been mentioned, I think that adds plenty of diversity to classes. You, essentially, have 8 core tanks, with 7 kinda off tanks. Out of 64 "class combinations," 15 can tank to one degree or another. 23% of the class choices can tank, many of which can also perform other role tasks to similar effectiveness.
I like that type of variety, personally. You can choose to dilute your effectiveness on any certain role to provide more flavor and utility.
NO in fact he has said the complete opposite to people also... ONLY Primaries have roles not secondaries!
- Core abilities that define a tank, healer, mage, rogue are not transferred via Sub classes..... Steven said "we will have to limit what is shared in subclasses or it will just be every going DPS + Support and DPS + Tank for dungeons and raids that everyone picking the most OP combo for PvE and PvP so no there will be limits like only 10% of the augments added by cleric will heal the others with be thematically Life and Death benefits that are not healing"
But that's ok cause remember as people KEEP DMing me "EVERYTHING IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE" so until Intrepid commits "On paper" nothing is right either way..... also love those that DM me on fake discord accounts and dont face me on here.. (not directed at you all here just wish some people would grow up)
Makes no sense to state that only primaries have roles. Secondary archetype means there can be secondary role if you don't double-down on your primary role by choosing the same archetype twice.
Active skills are not gained when choosing a secondary archetype, but a Tank/Cleric gains augments that can Heal and a Tank/Rogue gains augments that allow them to Stealth.
What a character can do with with an augment is a lesser degree than what can be done with an active skill - which is why Virtek said that those who choose Tank as secondary archetype can tank to some degree...which means they can off-tank to some degree.
The only way that can change is to not have secondary archetypes at all... which pretty much negates a core pillar of the game design.
Again that is the point of this Theory Craft / Hypothetical topic due to the nature of the ever evolving classes and that Steven has said to us while play Civ5 in VC these things which put previous statements as something many heard as incorrect including the old "Big topic Mage/ Tank can tank" in stream to then later say that "the augments of tank add survival and control affixes to the current mages abilities and possible a survival/control passive" and again You / Me and others all stated the way that works and we all want it the same way... like in the old post please intrepid prove me wrong cause every one of us can scream and say shit until we are blue in the face but that will be for nothing thinking it is "A" if in fact it is going to be "B" and worse is the when we find out..... but you will keep going back and commenting cause there is not way in hell i am right about any of this....... well then i hope i am made out to be an idiot by @Steven Sharif and the Intrepid team cause that is 1 Million times better than may concerns being facts !! Keep up the good work everyone at Intrepid AND in the community!!!!
Rather people have said that Mage/Tank can off-tank to some degree. A tank control augment affixing to the current Mage abilities and Spellshield possibly gaining a control passive is not new or contradictory info.
Tank/Mage will be a viable primary Tank.
Mage/Tank will be able to off-Tank to some degree due to having some augments that, when affixed to a Mage ability, will also utilize some control effects.
10% of Secondary Cleric augments healing others is not really new info - other than that's probably higher than I originally expected. I have never expected a Secondary Cleric to be as good at healing as a Primary Cleric. Even having one augment that can heal others has always been good enough.
Sounds to me that whatever Steven said in Civ5 voice chat is not contradictory info.
If there is contradictory info, that's going to add months to the schedule of releasing info on classes.
Especially since, if what you believe is true, the devs would have to spend time re-naming the majority of the class list.
Combos while doing certain actions feel very good to use, and sub class should have a noticeable impact on what you do, not just the same but with different types of damage.
For example, use a water spell and then lightning to increase the overall damage, and make it aoe, things like that.
I also think that they should allow to respect secondary class without any problems.