rumlox wrote: » I contacted customer support over this and they don't care at all that they are not honoring what braver of worlds paid for (earliest access). no packages above BoW has anything about earlier access, because they already sold earliest access to BoW. If they sold more of these packages then they can currently handle then they should have rotating groups of testers. At this point I wont be shocked if our lifetime subs turns out to only be good for a couple of years.
Undead Canuck wrote: » Please remember that all tiers of the kickstarter above Braver of Worlds include Braver of Worlds. None of the packages above needed to say anything as they included it. Just think of the testing in May as pre-Alpha 1 access to help get ready for Alpha 1. BoW will get Alpha 1 access.
Jahlon wrote: » So back in December of 2019 I booked a vacation. At that time, on the very day I booked it, they took my money and in exchange for my money I got certain guarantees about what I was getting for my money. Then a Pandemic Hit, and those guarantees went out the window. Why is that relevant? In 2017 Intrepid ran a Kickstarter. At that time, they had a plan. Then in 2018/2019 they had a set back and realized that their back end architecture had to be totally redone. That set back hit, and your guarantee of "earliest possible access" went right out the window. Unless you want them to just allow all 10,000 A1 backers into the server at one time, have it crash, and have them have no idea what the problem is and end up having weeks at a time of no testing as they try to figure out is it the loading server, the authentication system, the starter zone, or something else. Its like people forgot its "Alpha testing" not "Alpha I get to preview the game to get an advantage playtime"
Dante wrote: » Yeah, I just made a post on the subreddit about this and was directed here. It's upsetting being told something that isn't true. If there is any access to ashes for kick starter backers, then that is the earliest access. Anything after that isn't what we paid for.
noaani wrote: » Dante wrote: » Yeah, I just made a post on the subreddit about this and was directed here. It's upsetting being told something that isn't true. If there is any access to ashes for kick starter backers, then that is the earliest access. Anything after that isn't what we paid for. This is only one possible way of reading the kickstarter information, and as it turns out, this was the wrong way.
Dante wrote: » I get what your saying, but let's look at it this way. Let's say I stead of alpha access it was something physical, let's say a game console for arguments sake. Now, we all paid for the earliest access to the first version of this console ( alpha 1 earliest access). When they start shipping them out, they now say "we know 10k people paid for the earliest version of this console, but we're only shipping out a hundred for now, the rest of you will get yours at a later time in the months to follow." You could see how this would be upsetting and thought of as bad business practice. They shouldn't be giving access to the consoles/alpha until it's ready for all those that paid for it, not just a few.
unknownsystemerror wrote: » @blur A small group? Alpha 1 sales were capped at 10,000 and finished back in 2018.
Undead Canuck wrote: » So Dante, you expected to be offered the first character slot the game because you paid $500. But the ones who paid $5000 have to wait until you are already playing before they get a chance??? You both get access to Alpha 1, but you are annoyed that you haven't been invited yet? As far as I know, Alpha 1 has not yet been closed. Still don't understand how think you are being slighted. Again, if you are not invited before the close of Alpha 1, you have a right to be annoyed. But not until then.