Glorious Alpha Two Testers!

Phase I of Alpha Two testing will occur on weekends. Each weekend is scheduled to start on Fridays at 10 AM PT and end on Sundays at 10 PM PT. Find out more here.

Check out Alpha Two Announcements here to see the latest Alpha Two news and update notes.

Our quickest Alpha Two updates are in Discord. Testers with Alpha Two access can chat in Alpha Two channels by connecting your Discord and Intrepid accounts here.

Should you even PVP ? (Corruption)

2»

Comments

  • U5urPatorU5urPator Member, Alpha Two
    You don't have to do open-world 1v1 non-consensual pvp.
    However, you should to sieges, caravans etc as you benefit heavily from it.
  • NoaaniNoaani Member, Intrepid Pack, Alpha Two
    Aardvark wrote: »
    noaani wrote: »
    Aardvark wrote: »
    hazardnumberseven wrote: »
    Aardvark wrote: »
    hazardnumberseven wrote: »
    Aardvark wrote: »
    the main source of pvp appears is going to be sieges

    And players attacking each other for mats.

    If you kill someone who doesn't fight back you get corruption.

    If they do fight back, I don't get corruption though...
    And if they don't fight back, they take bigger penalties, so no fighting back probably means they have nothing worth fighting for, and if my opponent has nothing worth fighting for then I don't want to kill them. Not interested in griefing.

    Or they are as big of griefers as the pvper and use not fighting back as a way to give them the finger carebear style

    Here's the thing, if they don't fight back, it is still your choice if you want to continue to attack them or not. You can always just not kill them.

    You can't grief someone by not fighting back, because all that is doing is giving them the option to stop. You may not get the materials, but you also don't get the corruption.

    Except if someone doesn't want to pvp that would be the desired outcome...pvper walks off and leaves them alone

    Sometimes, yes. If this weren't the case, there wouldn't be a whole lot of actual choice between the two options though.

    The player being attacked has this choice to make.

    Since they have that choice to make, they can't complain about there being no choice, as there is a clear and obvious one.
Sign In or Register to comment.