Glorious Alpha Two Testers!
Phase I of Alpha Two testing will occur on weekends. Each weekend is scheduled to start on Fridays at 10 AM PT and end on Sundays at 10 PM PT. Find out more here.
Check out Alpha Two Announcements here to see the latest Alpha Two news and update notes.
Our quickest Alpha Two updates are in Discord. Testers with Alpha Two access can chat in Alpha Two channels by connecting your Discord and Intrepid accounts here.
Phase I of Alpha Two testing will occur on weekends. Each weekend is scheduled to start on Fridays at 10 AM PT and end on Sundays at 10 PM PT. Find out more here.
Check out Alpha Two Announcements here to see the latest Alpha Two news and update notes.
Our quickest Alpha Two updates are in Discord. Testers with Alpha Two access can chat in Alpha Two channels by connecting your Discord and Intrepid accounts here.
Caravan blocade
Strevi
Member
If you want to prevent caravans running between two nodes, can you do that?
I assume a single party can attack it.
A group will be required to successfully attack a caravan.[4][26]
If defenders win, can you attack the caravan immediately with a 2nd group?
Then with a 3rd?
I assume a single party can attack it.
A group will be required to successfully attack a caravan.[4][26]
If defenders win, can you attack the caravan immediately with a 2nd group?
Then with a 3rd?
September 12. 2022: Being naked can also be used to bring a skilled artisan to different freeholds... Don't summon family!
0
Comments
It's all absolutely vague at this point. So pretty much the answer is the classic "wait till alpha2".
Starts about 1:05:40
@superhero6785
The game has risk vs reward as a core pillar.
The purpose of being able to kill each other is to take the materials other players transport in their inventory. If that would be against the game philosophy, PvP could have an opt-in flag, like in New World.
The corruption penalties are not suppose to act as the NW solution.
We do not know how corruption will be balanced. Maybe first kill will be just a light debuff and only after 2-3 kills a bounty hunter will see the red player. And only after 4-5 kills might the corrupt player drop items on death.
Transporting the loot back to a storage should be riskier than driving a caravan because players must see an advantage using the caravans when transporting the goods between nodes.
And there is at least one good reason: you can hire NPC guards.
Hopefully those guards respawn to fight if the caravan is attacked 4-5 times on it's journey.
From what I know it is also not a single group can attack at a time, it just takes a group to engage in an action against or for the caravans safety. This sounds to me like when you are in a group and get into the proximity of a caravan you'll receive an automatic notification that let's you decide whether you want to attack defend or ignore the caravan. If you decide to attack or defend, you'll automatically be flagged for PvP meaning there would be no way to interact with a caravan and gain corruption from it. What's unclear is whether a player who decided to ignore the caravan (as in "clicked the option of "IGNORE" in the UI") can still attack - but even doing so would immediately flag them for PvP as the defenders are all flagged.
And there is a chance that ignoring the Caravan means you cannot participate in the fight at all like it will be in a different phase, visible but not interactable. Not sure about that though.
But yeah, being able to craft and lay out different traps on the route of caravans would be a fun addition.
I think you're misinformed as to the purpose of leaving in the ability to kill non-combatants in the first place. It's not to add extra risk to "PvE players". It's to allow a natural rise in tension and heated passion of the moment to take place from time to time. Those "acts of passion" have a cost. Corruption is specifically designed to thwart people from griefing non-combatants. Adding risk of losing all the loot you just got from a dungeon is not the intent for the system, and corruption will be balanced specifically to stop people from doing this on a regular basis.
Caravans on the other had are a high-risk / high-reward part of the game. It's an opt-in PvP system where, if successful, you can make a LOT of money, and other players have the opportunity to steal those goods if they've got the skill to do so. In other words - you have your thinking completely backwards.
If you attack me and I fail to opt-in for PvP and you kill me anyway, you will be punished with Corruption that is at least 2x the normal death penalties, the first time you kill me. And the penalities become increasingly
Even with Caravans, you opt-in to either defend or attack - but, by default, everyone is a Non-Combatant.
yes but let's not forget, I also get 50% of your loot after killing you if you didnt opt in to fight back, vs 25% or 0%
There is indeed something I've not noticed.
Certificates redeemed from distant economic regions via the caravan system will provide higher returns (4 to 5 times greater in some cases) than certificates collected from the same region.[1][3]
Based on wording, it could be that these certificates will drop in dungeons too and the game will prevent players to redeem the certificates if they are transported in player's own inventory.