Greetings, glorious testers!
Check out Alpha Two Announcements here to see the latest news on Alpha Two.
Check out general Announcements here to see the latest news on Ashes of Creation & Intrepid Studios.
To get the quickest updates regarding Alpha Two, connect your Discord and Intrepid accounts here.
Check out Alpha Two Announcements here to see the latest news on Alpha Two.
Check out general Announcements here to see the latest news on Ashes of Creation & Intrepid Studios.
To get the quickest updates regarding Alpha Two, connect your Discord and Intrepid accounts here.
Comments
In that game though, characters aren't deleted, they are moved to the regular server once killed.
Hardcore servers are a part of the core game, not some random player mod.
Both of these two facts above make it more likely that people will use it, yet the hardcore server always follows the same path. People create a character on it, run that character until they die, then continue to play that character on the regular server. Subsequent characters are generally made on the regular server as opposed to the hardcore server.
Essentially, things like this are a gimmick. Players use them in PoE as a challenge to themself - to see how long they can last. It isnt ever considered a core part of the game
Content creators are the only people that really take this kind of thing seriously, and only because it makes content better.
Also that's a separate game mode entirely that needs to be properly supported.
Works great in PoE, but even wow hasn't fully supported it so the jury is still out on how that fits into a game where you can't do everything yourself
Add the code to make it work to the test server and invite people to create new characters there - with a cosmetic prize for anyone that completes some specific goals (reaching a specific level, killing specific mobs, finishing specific quests etc).
The idea of running events on their own server, with ever so slightly different rules is one thing I wish developers would do more of.
I've only seen PoE and Archeage ever do this - and Archage only did it once that I know of (it was popular though).
My wife and I were playing a lot of MMORPGs over the years and at some point came to WoW Classic. I already anticipated, that I would have fun with it due to the nostalgic feelings involved etc. etc.
But I didnt expect how much my wife, who never played the old WoW, enjoyed it and even prefered it over newer versions of the game and other, newer MMORPGs. We were thinking a lot (and I really mean a lot) about this and a part of our conclusion is precisely represented by your post Arya.
Really hope Intreprid will stay with this as a core principle for their games design and overcome the temptation to weaken it to please a certain audience that in my interpretation falls into Stevens "the game is not for everyone" category.
Intrepid is already planning to do the exact thing your wife liked. They will already have a game that's "just like in the old days". That's been the whole plan from the very start. Arya could've just said "Intrepid wants to do a good thing. I want them to do that good thing" in the OP and people would've agreed way more than with this post.
It goes against both the spirit and the lore of the game.
You mask ask why? Because of lack of progression. If people do not feel progression in a video game they eventually ask themself "why am I doing this"? I keep dying in the same spot or at the same level... just to start all over again. And this spot or level of the game may feel mandatory to me. So this is no longer fun to me... let me just play something else.
There does need to be challenge, there does need to be some risk vs reward. But if the risk seems to heavy, you will lose players resulting in smaller servers, fewer servers, or dead game. If the goal is for millions to play or retaining several hundred thousand players this is not a good idea.
I have guildees right now who have left games like wow for shooters... why? lack of time. Not feeling their time respected, etc. Why grind for hundreds of hours always chasing the carrot to never get it... when I can just que into a 15 minute round to enjoy my time, wind down for bed, and then log?
In AoC, full hardcore isn't in scope. But there could be "Hardcore mode" events. IE, you can play this (weekend, week-long, whatever) event until you die. Then you're booted and cannot rejoin. I'd actually like to see this as a solo event, but the lack of focus on solo balancing means that probably won't work.
Maybe something to work on after release
But have you downloaded State of Survival from the link in the video to receive your 777 draws and the Legendary Hero Lucky?
The OP isn't refering to WoW Classic. He's talking about Hardcore gameplay, think Path of Exile.
I agree with you and you wife about WoW classic
You would 100 percent get PKd eventually, though, and I don't imagine HC folks would generally be ok with that.
I have rediscovered fun in a MMO where just by running around the map is a thrill, hardcore remembered me how good WoW is and it only became a bad game to me because since there was no risk involved everything became a grind
Now with hardcore there is no mindless grind and everything has a meaning, everything is well thought and well put together
I'm not advertising that permadeath is what devs should look for, but the post is about the community's quest for meaningful gameplay
Permadeath just makes blatant that people miss the adrenalin rush, I don't think games should be unforgivin like Path of Exile (which I also played and lost my favorite Gladiator), but having meaninful deaths and meaninful exploration is where the fun is
Many possibilities could be made other than permadeath, it all depeonds on the game... but ressurecting right after and just continuing the grind brakes the fun
Well then now I have a potentially useful question.
tl;dr Meaningful is a function of skill and in a competitive game setting the 'meaningful' slider to something that doesn't punish the average player results in no change long term.
The problem with MMOs is that generally their 'difficulty' is a weird function. You have to make it so that players don't have to be 100% at all times even in their combat, but gamers have a huge skill range. But then if the dying isn't the interesting part, what do you do?
I'll use MOBA anecdote because it's easy, I'm not really saying that MOBAs specifically are related to your topic, it's just that I can't think of a 'single player' game that feels hard without self imposed challenge, so:
A good Carry in Predecessor in a short game usually kills 10 opponents and dies maybe 5 times depending on how much escape their kit has.
An average one kills about 6 opponents and dies maybe 5 times.
A poor one kills 3 people and dies 15 times, and a genius one might kill 12 people and die only once. That genius one is never even thinking they're in danger. There's no adrenaline rush for them, it's just 'another day at the office'.
If you make an MMO where the GENERAL open world experience is dangerous to the AVERAGE player you haven't changed anything about the experiences of the people who tend to talk about the game. To those people (who are usually the 'winners' on a server in a competitive game) everything is still easy, and because things are easy to them, for their average opponents, every encounter with them is 'extra hard'.
Blizzard didn't change anything in the game (for now), everything is default
This is proof that people have been playing the game like zombies for years, dying carelessly and indifferent to consequences of any kind... Now, this just shows that the lack of incentive for staying alive has made them bad at the game. In hardcore people are feeling alive and having fun
Or its proof that people are only playing it as a gimmick, as a side show.
People are going there to meme it up, not to have a meaningful gaming experience.
I am really grateful that Ashes has a different aproach to this and I hope they don't back down on this or tune it down so much that it becomes irrelevant because I highly doubt corporate will ever have the guts to try and I don't want to wait 20+ years to maybe find a game that will. We need a prime example to prove that this can work and that our games are allowed and even need to have challenge to them.
In terms of difficulty and what is appropriate I don't see a problem during level phase if you don't explicitly introduce it. By that I mean mechanics like WoW's hit rating that artificially increases the power gap between attacker and target by reducing the hit chance for every level of difference. To the point that it soon becomes undoable even though the dps to hp ratio has barely changed. This of course requires giving the players meaningful content they can do together without the need of micromanaging quest progress. What I mean by this is that traditionally in theme park mmos every person has personal progression in a story line of a zone. Which is nice for telling a narrative but a real hassle when you want level somewhere that matches your or your group's level of strength. Quests are often implemented as chains (meaning you can't hop in at any point but have to do all previous steps) starting at a certain level. If you level alone this might be fine. Quest chain starters becomes available when your character hits a level the devs think is appropriate and then provide content of appropriate level as you progress through a zone. But this changes a lot if any or a combination of the following happen (only the first few I could think of. There is propably more)
- You like to quest as a group (especially relevant for non-dps-classes)
- - The level of your group members varies
- You you have higher personal skill level as what the quest is balanced around
- You like more challenge
- You have something affect your experience income (basically any activity that you can do asside from questing)
A lot of these things already apply to playing in single player mode. If you bring more players into the equation it only gets worse. This is where I think story arcs will help us a lot because they provide a meaningful goal that is available to everyone propably in a broad level range that everyone progresses in as a team. They were said to have multiple objectives which maybe don't have to be for the same level and can yield different amount of quest progress for participating. This way you are part of the same narrative but you can adjust the difficulty as members leave and join the party or as you see fit and you have a reason to get back into . If you combine this with quests that don't have many preconditions, if any at all, you give the players some flexibility to adjust the difficulty themselves. If you take the risk taking on higher level mobs with the chance of additional, better or just different rewards/experience is up to you and if you like to play it safe and feel cozy you just do simpler objectives. At least this sounds like a vlaid option for me but I m not sure whether it still works in endgame content.
I think the main goal of the original post was to show that the hardcore movement, even though really unforgiving, already appeals to some players who miss the challenge in their games. And challenge is not really about the punishment but about the fun, thrill and pride propably many of us felt when first playing mmos. When we got out of dangerous situations, when we achieved a certain level and because we have learned from our mistakes and those of others, made friends and got to know the world better. That got lost along the way due to us becoming more experienced as mmo players and games getting easier. It is not just character progression (level, items,..) but also player progression (player skill). Hardcore is just some challenge to bring back a bit of viewing the world through the eyes of a child. And yeah maybe some people try to get attention and clicks with this but some others do it purely for their enjoyment because we can't wipe our brains to get this experience back so one has to find other ways.
The only three things this shows in my opinon are: (1) risk motivates people who love to play daredevil style, (2) the love of this mode amongst streamers means they are almost the only ones with the time to commit to building back up after death and (3) there are no more interesting MMORPGs out there to play and watch so modding old ones is the only solution next to just letting the genre rest (for now).
In EVE Online (2003) some missions are so hard for your skill level (or you lost the quest item, because you died and random people looted it) that you simply turn around and go talk to the npc and click ABANDON MISSION and it fails LOL. But, if you find someone else doing the same mission, kill that player, loot the mission item, you can go to the NPC and deliver the item a if it was yours and the mission is sucessful.
In Guild Wars 2 (2012) it is impossible failing a quest, also any random person (not even in the party) can shoot your mobs and that will also help you in completing the quest, you will both complete the quest/event and the payout will be in full for both of you. Everybody is a winner in GW2 PvE.
What I would like to see in a MMO is you starting your own quests and goals, even setting goals for your weapons... let's say you right click your sword and select an achievement, then you complete that achievement along many days. When this tracker is complete you can turn your sword into a legendary sword. That would mean something
I gave up playing a few games with hit rating influenced by level differences, this is utter garbage... I want to play a game where I can create my level 1 character right now and if I see a level 50 with 1 hp in his health bar, I want to gank him while being level 1
They know it is fun, they have a public to appease to, also the streamers themselves sometimes are on the edge playing wow hardcore.They streaming this is just proof
As a streamer, in a frustrating genre, this is not even remotely how this works.
One thing you hear from people who watch Fighting Game streams a lot is that they watch because they can't play.
Playing is too frustrating, the game is too hard, the mindsets required are too strict. What they want is to watch someone who has already mastered all those things. This goes for so many sports, not even for just streaming. Football, MMA, the people watching these are not watching 'because they would find those sports fun to play', they watch it because it is fun to watch.