codewarlock wrote: » I think most sub games that end up switching to F2P still carry a sort of monthly "Elite" status package which usually includes free cosmetics, XP boosts, free mico-currency, extra slots, special pets/mounts, etc. I assume in this instance, we would get elite or VIP status for the life of the game. Given that the game itself is free, I wouldn't anticipate a F2P switch for quite a long time, if at all
Lalli wrote: » codewarlock wrote: » I think most sub games that end up switching to F2P still carry a sort of monthly "Elite" status package which usually includes free cosmetics, XP boosts, free mico-currency, extra slots, special pets/mounts, etc. I assume in this instance, we would get elite or VIP status for the life of the game. Given that the game itself is free, I wouldn't anticipate a F2P switch for quite a long time, if at all Well it would most likely be cosmetics/micro currency to buy cosmetics. I don't think it will ever have to switch to F2P. On a side note I don't understand why many people are against sub games in general but I like them. Something like runescape (Old School) does it right in my opinion.
codewarlock wrote: » Lalli wrote: » codewarlock wrote: » I think most sub games that end up switching to F2P still carry a sort of monthly "Elite" status package which usually includes free cosmetics, XP boosts, free mico-currency, extra slots, special pets/mounts, etc. I assume in this instance, we would get elite or VIP status for the life of the game. Given that the game itself is free, I wouldn't anticipate a F2P switch for quite a long time, if at all Well it would most likely be cosmetics/micro currency to buy cosmetics. I don't think it will ever have to switch to F2P. On a side note I don't understand why many people are against sub games in general but I like them. Something like runescape (Old School) does it right in my opinion. Same here! Subs + cosmetic options = gravy.
noaani wrote: » Cosmetic options will provide less income than a box price on the game would, especially if that box price applied to expansion content as well. If any two combinations were to "= gravy" it would be box price + sub, not sub + cosmetics.
Lalli wrote: » noaani wrote: » Cosmetic options will provide less income than a box price on the game would, especially if that box price applied to expansion content as well. If any two combinations were to "= gravy" it would be box price + sub, not sub + cosmetics. I don't know if I agree with that. Depends on the box price I think. I'm not against either way though. If its a good game people will come.
noaani wrote: » codewarlock wrote: » Lalli wrote: » codewarlock wrote: » I think most sub games that end up switching to F2P still carry a sort of monthly "Elite" status package which usually includes free cosmetics, XP boosts, free mico-currency, extra slots, special pets/mounts, etc. I assume in this instance, we would get elite or VIP status for the life of the game. Given that the game itself is free, I wouldn't anticipate a F2P switch for quite a long time, if at all Well it would most likely be cosmetics/micro currency to buy cosmetics. I don't think it will ever have to switch to F2P. On a side note I don't understand why many people are against sub games in general but I like them. Something like runescape (Old School) does it right in my opinion. Same here! Subs + cosmetic options = gravy. Cosmetic options will provide less income than a box price on the game would, especially if that box price applied to expansion content as well. If any two combinations were to "= gravy" it would be box price + sub, not sub + cosmetics.
codewarlock wrote: » noaani wrote: » codewarlock wrote: » Lalli wrote: » codewarlock wrote: » I think most sub games that end up switching to F2P still carry a sort of monthly "Elite" status package which usually includes free cosmetics, XP boosts, free mico-currency, extra slots, special pets/mounts, etc. I assume in this instance, we would get elite or VIP status for the life of the game. Given that the game itself is free, I wouldn't anticipate a F2P switch for quite a long time, if at all Well it would most likely be cosmetics/micro currency to buy cosmetics. I don't think it will ever have to switch to F2P. On a side note I don't understand why many people are against sub games in general but I like them. Something like runescape (Old School) does it right in my opinion. Same here! Subs + cosmetic options = gravy. Cosmetic options will provide less income than a box price on the game would, especially if that box price applied to expansion content as well. If any two combinations were to "= gravy" it would be box price + sub, not sub + cosmetics. Hehehe, I more so meant it's gravy to me. At the end of the day, I'm willing to shell out whatever the price if the experience is worth the while. I've played Runescape, Guild Wars (1&2), WoW, Rift, SWTOR, Terra, WIldstar--they've all had their own payment methods but I never found any of them unreasonable for the experience I enjoyed.
OrcLuck wrote: » I don't know. I want the game to do well, and I think they're listening. If I asked would I have wanted a life time sub on World of Warcraft for 500 I think my answer would be... I'd be willing to pay 1000, its kind of like....who knows, what the game will mean to you. To me, its a game that fills a need, in a down trodden genre. I think having a life time sub to a game I helped contribute to the launch of, and had an impact in the design of, means more to me then if I bought one for another game. That being said, I bought this tier exclusively for the life time sub and everything else is more chips n dip.
Sterigo wrote: » Is it still possible to buy the lifetime sub?
Nagash wrote: » Sterigo wrote: » Is it still possible to buy the lifetime sub? sadly no, it was only available for people who back the game on Kickstarter/summer backers
glory wrote: » Nagash wrote: » Sterigo wrote: » Is it still possible to buy the lifetime sub? sadly no, it was only available for people who back the game on Kickstarter/summer backers I was under the impression that people who choose lesser packages could still upgrade. Is that not an option anymore?
Masscarnage wrote: » Anyone have any thoughts?