George_Black wrote: » JustVine wrote: » George_Black wrote: » JustVine wrote: » Hailee wrote: » I wish all the pve only cry babies would just go ahead and die,in ashes on a pvx server playing the game the way it's meant to be enjoyed. I assume you 'totally' mean that 'metaphorically' and not literally since you actually care about the forum's rules. Either way this is totally uncalled for language in my opinion, no matter how much you disagree with someones tastes or opinions. Clueless... looking for the worst in people automatically, through a prism, to the point that you are blind and cant read. Oh? Would you care to explain to me what it meant then? No.
JustVine wrote: » George_Black wrote: » JustVine wrote: » Hailee wrote: » I wish all the pve only cry babies would just go ahead and die,in ashes on a pvx server playing the game the way it's meant to be enjoyed. I assume you 'totally' mean that 'metaphorically' and not literally since you actually care about the forum's rules. Either way this is totally uncalled for language in my opinion, no matter how much you disagree with someones tastes or opinions. Clueless... looking for the worst in people automatically, through a prism, to the point that you are blind and cant read. Oh? Would you care to explain to me what it meant then?
George_Black wrote: » JustVine wrote: » Hailee wrote: » I wish all the pve only cry babies would just go ahead and die,in ashes on a pvx server playing the game the way it's meant to be enjoyed. I assume you 'totally' mean that 'metaphorically' and not literally since you actually care about the forum's rules. Either way this is totally uncalled for language in my opinion, no matter how much you disagree with someones tastes or opinions. Clueless... looking for the worst in people automatically, through a prism, to the point that you are blind and cant read.
JustVine wrote: » Hailee wrote: » I wish all the pve only cry babies would just go ahead and die,in ashes on a pvx server playing the game the way it's meant to be enjoyed. I assume you 'totally' mean that 'metaphorically' and not literally since you actually care about the forum's rules. Either way this is totally uncalled for language in my opinion, no matter how much you disagree with someones tastes or opinions.
Hailee wrote: » I wish all the pve only cry babies would just go ahead and die,in ashes on a pvx server playing the game the way it's meant to be enjoyed.
JustVine wrote: » George_Black wrote: » JustVine wrote: » George_Black wrote: » JustVine wrote: » Hailee wrote: » I wish all the pve only cry babies would just go ahead and die,in ashes on a pvx server playing the game the way it's meant to be enjoyed. I assume you 'totally' mean that 'metaphorically' and not literally since you actually care about the forum's rules. Either way this is totally uncalled for language in my opinion, no matter how much you disagree with someones tastes or opinions. Clueless... looking for the worst in people automatically, through a prism, to the point that you are blind and cant read. Oh? Would you care to explain to me what it meant then? No. Glad to hear. I'd rather have Hailee explain themselves.
George_Black wrote: » JustVine wrote: » George_Black wrote: » JustVine wrote: » George_Black wrote: » JustVine wrote: » Hailee wrote: » I wish all the pve only cry babies would just go ahead and die,in ashes on a pvx server playing the game the way it's meant to be enjoyed. I assume you 'totally' mean that 'metaphorically' and not literally since you actually care about the forum's rules. Either way this is totally uncalled for language in my opinion, no matter how much you disagree with someones tastes or opinions. Clueless... looking for the worst in people automatically, through a prism, to the point that you are blind and cant read. Oh? Would you care to explain to me what it meant then? No. Glad to hear. I'd rather have Hailee explain themselves. You made the accusation. Shouldnt you explain yourself on why you wrote what you wrote, based on the post you quoted?
Dygz wrote: » Um. Caravan runs are an activity people can do to satisfy their PvP itch for the day. If they can find a Mayoral or [Node] Quest caravan. Of course, satisfying a PvP itch for the day depends on how casual or hardcore the individual is with regard to PvP combat. I don't know that anyone outright called it PvE content. Again, what SirChancelot said several times is that even on a "PvE server", PvP would still occur for battlegrounds, like caravan runs. We tend to generalize caravan runs as a type of PvP battlegrounds. Especially Mayoral and [Node] Quest caravans. But, if no players attack the caravan - and no PvP combat occurs - that's PvE.
Mag7spy wrote: » George_Black wrote: » JustVine wrote: » George_Black wrote: » JustVine wrote: » Hailee wrote: » I wish all the pve only cry babies would just go ahead and die,in ashes on a pvx server playing the game the way it's meant to be enjoyed. I assume you 'totally' mean that 'metaphorically' and not literally since you actually care about the forum's rules. Either way this is totally uncalled for language in my opinion, no matter how much you disagree with someones tastes or opinions. Clueless... looking for the worst in people automatically, through a prism, to the point that you are blind and cant read. Oh? Would you care to explain to me what it meant then? No. Just vine is a pve Andy that thinks he knows what pvp is when he is a pve player. So he is mad when he hears pve doesn't take as much skill as pvp.
JustVine wrote: » George_Black wrote: » JustVine wrote: » George_Black wrote: » JustVine wrote: » George_Black wrote: » JustVine wrote: » Hailee wrote: » I wish all the pve only cry babies would just go ahead and die,in ashes on a pvx server playing the game the way it's meant to be enjoyed. I assume you 'totally' mean that 'metaphorically' and not literally since you actually care about the forum's rules. Either way this is totally uncalled for language in my opinion, no matter how much you disagree with someones tastes or opinions. Clueless... looking for the worst in people automatically, through a prism, to the point that you are blind and cant read. Oh? Would you care to explain to me what it meant then? No. Glad to hear. I'd rather have Hailee explain themselves. You made the accusation. Shouldnt you explain yourself on why you wrote what you wrote, based on the post you quoted? No.
Mag7spy wrote: » Why would people that want to be a on pve server want to do pvp content, literarily makes no sense.
Dygz wrote: » Mag7spy wrote: » Why would people that want to be a on pve server want to do pvp content, literarily makes no sense. Because the issue is nonconsensual PvP. And battegrounds are scheduled and consensual. With battlegrounds, you do not lose "all" your stuff. And death penalties are disabled.
Grimseethe wrote: » Wait are there really no pve servers??? thats moronic. Nothing worse than trying to level and enjoy the world and being ganked by cowards. 99% of the time whoever attacks first wins, they have time to prepare and can wait until youre in combat with an NPC, its cowardly and skilless, probably why ive never done it. If i dont ever gank..why would i want to be in a server where im getting ganked. Its not about being good, i used to solo teams in wotlk arenas, arenas and dueling take skill, ganking does not. PVE servers are going to become your top priority now or thousands of players will be driven away. Ive been loosely following this game for years and i didnt know this, most gamers arent on forums, they arent keeping up to date, when they find this out the drop off will be massive, trust me.
Mag7spy wrote: » Grimseethe wrote: » Wait are there really no pve servers??? thats moronic. Nothing worse than trying to level and enjoy the world and being ganked by cowards. 99% of the time whoever attacks first wins, they have time to prepare and can wait until youre in combat with an NPC, its cowardly and skilless, probably why ive never done it. If i dont ever gank..why would i want to be in a server where im getting ganked. Its not about being good, i used to solo teams in wotlk arenas, arenas and dueling take skill, ganking does not. PVE servers are going to become your top priority now or thousands of players will be driven away. Ive been loosely following this game for years and i didnt know this, most gamers arent on forums, they arent keeping up to date, when they find this out the drop off will be massive, trust me. Game is not designed for everyone, no game is it was pretty clear what type of game this was if you have been keeping up with any kind of information. A ton of players wouldn't be interested if it wasn't PvX. Anyone saying I won't try this game because it doesn't have PvE while it is designed as a PvX game most likely wouldn't stay long either way and be subbed to the game. You are coming in bad faith with exaggerated idea of thinking the game is a gank fest. Understand the game, how the PvP works and make a judgment after playing it to see how the systems are in place so that doesn't happens that has been said again and again. This is exactly why PvE carebears are a issue "PVE servers are going to become your top priority now" their top priority is making a PvX game lmao. End of the day there are very few mmorpgs coming out and this is the only one not going to be pay 2 win. A shit ton of people will be picking up and trying the game when it eventually releases. But if you really think PvE servers are the priority (from being high on copium) I hear lost ark has a lot of pve content.
Otr wrote: » Grimseethe wrote: » Wait are there really no pve servers??? thats moronic. Nothing worse than trying to level and enjoy the world and being ganked by cowards. Players who will kill PvE players will get corruption:https://ashesofcreation.wiki/Corruption What do you think about this system? Will it work? Do you see any loopholes? If it will work, then most PvE players will feel fine in the game.
Grimseethe wrote: » Wait are there really no pve servers??? thats moronic. Nothing worse than trying to level and enjoy the world and being ganked by cowards.
Grimseethe wrote: » Game doesnt need to be deisnged for everyone, just need pve servers. Hundreds of thousands will drop out in first month, due to want pve servers, write it down.
Grimseethe wrote: » Otr wrote: » Grimseethe wrote: » Wait are there really no pve servers??? thats moronic. Nothing worse than trying to level and enjoy the world and being ganked by cowards. Players who will kill PvE players will get corruption:https://ashesofcreation.wiki/Corruption What do you think about this system? Will it work? Do you see any loopholes? If it will work, then most PvE players will feel fine in the game. It just make world pvp pointless, no one is going to do something if it makes them weaker and takes away QOL. The novelty will wear off so fast.
Mag7spy wrote: » I think you really don't understand the PvP in this game or pvp in general since you are a pve player, this game isn't shadowbane
Mag7spy wrote: » Game is designed for it, there are plenty of other mmorpgs that are designed as PvE. Something not designed for only PvE only causes more issues in the end. As I've started before people demand more and more pve elements which that is not how the game is.
Otr wrote: » Hailee wrote: » Otr wrote: » They might get upset, hunt you down and kill you with a special finisher animation to punish you, when you are corrupt Don't underestimate their rage. Those bounty hunters are crazy berserkers. That's exactly how I want the game to be. To have conflict, risk, changes and multiple good and bad interactions driven by player action. Sounds like a good time. Reading the wikihttps://ashesofcreation.wiki/Player_death I see A non-combatant (green player) who dies suffers normal penalties A combatant (purple player) who dies suffers these same penalties, but at half the rate of a non-combatant So there is an incentive to fight back instead of just letting the other player become corrupt. I am very curious how things will work out. Probably if the PvE player will let himself die, the other loots him but will also curse a little and run away. Bounty hunters will not see the lightly cursed players, which is OK. Will be an interesting game No matter how this is balanced, PvE players will not be happy.
Hailee wrote: » Otr wrote: » They might get upset, hunt you down and kill you with a special finisher animation to punish you, when you are corrupt Don't underestimate their rage. Those bounty hunters are crazy berserkers. That's exactly how I want the game to be. To have conflict, risk, changes and multiple good and bad interactions driven by player action. Sounds like a good time.
Otr wrote: » They might get upset, hunt you down and kill you with a special finisher animation to punish you, when you are corrupt Don't underestimate their rage. Those bounty hunters are crazy berserkers.
A non-combatant (green player) who dies suffers normal penalties A combatant (purple player) who dies suffers these same penalties, but at half the rate of a non-combatant