Gaettusk wrote: » The real question is whether the leveling speed estimate is at Steven pace or non-Steven pace.
Flanker wrote: » Okay, so I'll ask you the same, simple "Yes" or "No" question, alright? Shouldn't be that difficult to answer. Based on what you said, does it mean that you suggest only taking into account the preferences of 55,6% of players who voted for the first option, while completely ignoring 44,4% of the players who voted for "90 days" and higher? Yes or No?
Zehlan wrote: » Flanker wrote: » Zehlan wrote: » Also you have failed to debunk any facts that I have brought forth.The facts-the majority wants 225 hours or 45 day equivalent. Okay, so I'll ask you the same, simple "Yes" or "No" question, alright? Shouldn't be that difficult to answer. Based on what you said, does it mean that you suggest only taking into account the preferences of 55,6% of players who voted for the first option, while completely ignoring 44,4% of the players who voted for "90 days" and higher? Yes or No?I do love the cut and dry no variables just all or nothing question yes 100%! Wow must of rattled you pretty good because I already answered it. It was a simple question of business yet you QQ oh it's manipulation it's not fair . Even If it was 56% vs 44% it would be no different than 56% vs 9% it will be the same result. I like how you always fall back to retention when facts are stated you can't refute them or using means to determine polling outcomes that is so laughable but a nice attempt at manipulating people. Do they use this technique in government elections where your from? Doesn't matter how many seats the majority wins by because they just do means to the polling data so every body ends up with the same amount of seats. Anyway I just wanted to see if you would answer my question without a plethora of excuses I got my answer.
Flanker wrote: » Zehlan wrote: » Also you have failed to debunk any facts that I have brought forth.The facts-the majority wants 225 hours or 45 day equivalent. Okay, so I'll ask you the same, simple "Yes" or "No" question, alright? Shouldn't be that difficult to answer. Based on what you said, does it mean that you suggest only taking into account the preferences of 55,6% of players who voted for the first option, while completely ignoring 44,4% of the players who voted for "90 days" and higher? Yes or No?I do love the cut and dry no variables just all or nothing question yes 100%! Wow must of rattled you pretty good because I already answered it. It was a simple question of business yet you QQ oh it's manipulation it's not fair . Even If it was 56% vs 44% it would be no different than 56% vs 9% it will be the same result. I like how you always fall back to retention when facts are stated you can't refute them or using means to determine polling outcomes that is so laughable but a nice attempt at manipulating people. Do they use this technique in government elections where your from? Doesn't matter how many seats the majority wins by because they just do means to the polling data so every body ends up with the same amount of seats. Anyway I just wanted to see if you would answer my question without a plethora of excuses I got my answer.
Zehlan wrote: » Also you have failed to debunk any facts that I have brought forth.The facts-the majority wants 225 hours or 45 day equivalent.
Flanker wrote: » Noaani wrote: » Yeah, but a random thread from 3 years ago - that's what makes it creepy. Maybe it is stalkerish, maybe it isn't. Either way, it's sure as hell creepy. If someone I knew did that kind of thing, I'd get a restraining order out against them. Dude, what are you even talking about? It's not some personal or sensitive information - it's someone calling you what you are on a public forum while publicly replying to your comment that you also made, surpise - PUBLICLY. Learn the difference between OSINT and stalking. Damn, I'll even google it for you:OSINT stands for open source intelligence, which refers to legally gathered information about an individual or organization from free, public sources. OSINT is completely legal because it only uses information that is available through open sources. So Mr Professional Full-Time Victim, stop whining already, for god's sake
Noaani wrote: » Yeah, but a random thread from 3 years ago - that's what makes it creepy. Maybe it is stalkerish, maybe it isn't. Either way, it's sure as hell creepy. If someone I knew did that kind of thing, I'd get a restraining order out against them.
Saabynator wrote: » I would generally like a slow level speed. Although, if they do come through on all the vertical progression and the - really freaking awesome!, world they wanna make, then leveling speed will be less important. But I am a huge fan of the old EQ1 leveling times. It should take a long time, as long as there is stuff to do while leveling. Every cool thing should not come after max level, it should come along the way.
JmanX wrote: » Saabynator wrote: » I would generally like a slow level speed. Although, if they do come through on all the vertical progression and the - really freaking awesome!, world they wanna make, then leveling speed will be less important. But I am a huge fan of the old EQ1 leveling times. It should take a long time, as long as there is stuff to do while leveling. Every cool thing should not come after max level, it should come along the way. This sums it pretty well
Flanker wrote: » Flanker wrote: » P.S. I hereby challenge you or anyone else from this thread who dares to have a 1v1 debate. We can even invite an unbiased moderator if you want.
Flanker wrote: » P.S. I hereby challenge you or anyone else from this thread who dares to have a 1v1 debate. We can even invite an unbiased moderator if you want.
Zehlan wrote: » It was a simple question of business yet you QQ oh it's manipulation it's not fair .
Zehlan wrote: » I do love the cut and dry no variables just all or nothing question yes 100%!
Zehlan wrote: » I like how you always fall back to retention when facts are stated you can't refute them or using means to determine polling outcomes that is so laughable but a nice attempt at manipulating people.
Zehlan wrote: » Do they use this technique in government elections where your from? Doesn't matter how many seats the majority wins by because they just do means to the polling data so every body ends up with the same amount of seats.
Zehlan wrote: » Anyway I just wanted to see if you would answer my question without a plethora of excuses I got my answer.
Flanker wrote: » Alright, I gave it a chance and actually read all of it. Haven't learned anything I didn't know already, but the funny thing begins now. You are obviously going to bounce and won't give an answer to this (and entertain me again by saying something unimaginably stupid), but here is the question: can you specify which part exactly was supposed to prove that my calculations are not valid? And now, let me enjoy and see you bounce. Why? Because apparently, you thought that I would either ignore it, not understand what's written there or get overwhelmed by a couple of "scary-looking mathematical formulas". Well, guess again. Can't wait for your answer.
Flanker wrote: » P.S. You don't wanna bounce again and make yourself even more of a clown that you already are, don't you?P.S.S. Come debate me 1v1 face-to-face. With that"logic" of yours, I'll steamroll you (obviously, in a polite and respectful way) in 10 minutes and you'll be free to go.
Noaani wrote: » Wow, you don't even realize why it's creepy. It isn't that it is or isn't public information. It's just creepy. As to you claiming I am "playing the victim", no, you're just creepy.
abc0815 wrote: » LoL OK so i do and concede right away that you won. What now? You know nobody here can change anything about this game right?! But to me it seems you just want to be "right".
Flanker wrote: » Wiki says the following:On release the developers anticipate max level should be attainable in approximately 45 days if playing 4-6 hours per day. This is equal to ~225 hours to reach level 50. What is your opinion about it? Would you like it to be faster or slower?
Flanker wrote: » Noaani wrote: » Wow, you don't even realize why it's creepy. It isn't that it is or isn't public information. It's just creepy. As to you claiming I am "playing the victim", no, you're just creepy. I couldn't care less whether you consider it "creepy" or not. I haven't done anything illegal or bad. Cry about it
Noaani wrote: » I didn't say illegal or bad, I said creepy. I always said creepy. If objectively bad or illegal are your lines before which you question your actions, that's a hell of a reflection on you. Most of us curb ourselves well before we get to that point.
Flanker wrote: » we are here to talk about leveling
Noaani wrote: » Flanker wrote: » we are here to talk about leveling Then don't quote comments from discussions that are years old and have nothing to do with leveling. If you don't want a people getting side tracked in to talking about how creepy you are being, don't be creepy. It's kind of simple - people will always talk about the thing that stands out the most to them. With this in mind, make sure the thing you want them to talk about is the thing that stands out the most about what you say to them. Creepiness is kind of high on the list of things that stand out. If you want peiple to talk about how creepy your actions are, then you only need to be a little bit creepy. If you don't want them to talk about it, then don't be creepy at all. Kind of simple.
Flanker wrote: » stop whining already, for god's sake
Aszkalon wrote: » Flanker doesn't back down. He is defending his Point like a good Citizen would defend his own Node.
