Greetings, glorious adventurers! If you're joining in our Alpha One spot testing, please follow the steps here to see all the latest test info on our forums and Discord!
-
Re: Unpopular opinion : Zergs are necessary and Castle sieges should not be fair
In what dystopian nightmare is gameplay a "handout"? The richer players on the winning side can still be the ones who get to cash in all the rewards for their investment, that's not a deter… (View Post)1 -
Re: Unpopular opinion : Zergs are necessary and Castle sieges should not be fair
It's very simple: All players should be able to have agency and impact on developments in the game. Tryhards should have more impact. But a tryhard shouldn't have 100% of potential impact on the stat… (View Post)1 -
Re: Unpopular opinion : Zergs are necessary and Castle sieges should not be fair
why they should get access to the most rewarding content? Because content =/= reward; content is just ... the game. The rewards of owning and controlling the castle and nodes can be 100% left to the … (View Post)1 -
Re: Unpopular opinion : Zergs are necessary and Castle sieges should not be fair
Even if the upper limit on citizens was like 500, and the siege would be 1000v1000, many citizens might still be denied their ability to defend, because the defending node leadership could decide to … (View Post)2 -
Re: Unpopular opinion : Zergs are necessary and Castle sieges should not be fair
You're wrong though. I've been the guy who kept having to rally people together when the enemy was zerging, or the enemy tryhard guilds were controlling everything and taking everything uncontested. … (View Post)2