DPS Meter Megathread

This discussion was created from comments split from: DPS Meter Megathread.

I’ve instructed the mods to focus any dps meter threads into a single mega thread to help focus and centralize the discussion 👍

Find more posts tagged with

Staff

Comments

georgeblack

Dps meters are a dungeon mechanic.
If dungeon bosses are dps races then they are badly designed.

In the open world bad players cannot reach the areas that good players are farming or leveling. All players in those areas should be considered able.

I never liked dps meters. It forces players to select a specific weapon or class.
So what if a two handed sword warrior is dealing a bit less dps than a twin sword warrior? Without a dps meter nobody would ever notice the difference.

Also /join a guild....... dont pug

Dygz

Lack of DPS meters alone won’t stop the behavior, but in conjunction with non-static and non-repeatable raids... in addition to raiding with friends from your Node to end threats to the Node, the behavior will be reduced.
I expect it will be significantly reduced.

It should be easier to find and play with the people we like to play when we like to play because we will know where those people live.
And because we won’t be moving to other zones just because we’ve outleveled a zone.

It should be much easier to teach people how to react to other players’ weapon combos to get the most bang for the buck than it will be to rant about DPS.
It’s going to be more important to know how individuals are augmented than it will be to monitor combat trackers.

We shouldn’t need a tool to be able to adequately track combo combo, combo, ultimate - combo, combo, ultimate.

Noaani

unknownsystemerror wrote: »

posting an achievement or meter information will not be an indication of ability to do content successfully a second time.

To be clear, I have never considered this to be much of an indication anyway.

However, the kind of player that would kick someone out of a raid or group because they think that player isn't spec'd *right* are also the kind of player that think these things are accurate.

This thread seems to be bout stopping that kind of player being that kind of player, rather than being about the actual merits of any given tool. This is despite the fact that the above kind of player will be that kind of player regardless of what tools they do or do not have.

As to the rest of your post, a combat tracker is a useful tool within a single nights raiding. You don't need to use it to compare from one nights raid to another, or from one raid guild to another for it to be a useful tool.

Wandering Mist

georgeblack wrote: »

Dps meters are a dungeon mechanic.
If dungeon bosses are dps races then they are badly designed.

DPS race bosses do have their place, but they need to be used sparingly. I am actually a huge fan of bosses where the difficulty slowly ramps up over the course of the fight. While not a strict DPS check with a hard enrage, these fights gradually build up the pressure on the dps who need to finish the fight before the healers run out of mana and everyone dies.

Noaani

wanderingmist wrote: »

georgeblack wrote: »

Dps meters are a dungeon mechanic.
If dungeon bosses are dps races then they are badly designed.

DPS race bosses do have their place, but they need to be used sparingly. I am actually a huge fan of bosses where the difficulty slowly ramps up over the course of the fight. While not a strict DPS check with a hard enrage, these fights gradually build up the pressure on the dps who need to finish the fight before the healers run out of mana and everyone dies.

Absolutely.

There should be some group and raid mobs where the tank has to be 100% on their game or the group/raid will die. By definition, this would be a tank check.

There should be some group and raid mobs where the healers have to be 100% on their game or the group/raid will die. By definition, this would be a healer check.

There should be some group and raid mobs where the CC has to be 100% on their game or the group/raid will die. By definition, this would be a CC check.

There should be some group and raid mobs where the DPS has to be 100% on their game or the group/raid will die. By definition, this would be a DPS check.

I seriously hope no one even tries to argue with the above in any serious manner, though I'm sure any attempt would be entertaining.

Azathoth

I agree, but I do not think a DPS/ACT are needed for those 100% Role Checks. If the area/mob* is for a certain level range of play, then there should be a variety of builds that could perform at that level.

So the 100% on point Tank Check would either be successful or not. You'll know with or without a tracker/meter. Because of the stipulation of being 100% on point a good player with the meta tank build could still fail, so what use is the meter?

Hopefully the 100% on point checks are more robust. Situations where the Tank/ Mage doesn't quite have to be at 100% but the Tank/Rogue would have to be and vice versa. Same with all the other augments.

I like the thought of these typea of encounters, but I am not sure why they would benefit from a Tracker/Meter.

Either way it seems like building a character (outside of looking builds up or being told what builds are good) is trial and error.

*edit

consultant

I use dps meters to test out performance of different setups. So if I am not running the usuall top dps cookie cutter set up. I can tell them it only makes this much difference so no big deal.
With programs (that maybe inaccurate) like Ask mister robot. Basically you look at some ones gear set up in game then transfer that information to website and it will tell you all their supposed mistakes.

So that is the real reason people are telling you about your set up.. They upload it to some website and bingo that player supposedly can tell you everything you are doing wrong as far as set up is concerned. Thing is I had a dps meter and knew that Mister Robot was very inaccurate. So all this people telling you what your build
should be are mistaken and think they are smart.

So really no dps meter basically makes those type of websites the authority on how you should run your set up cuase you do not have a good dps meter that helps you analyze data to show you the truth.

Noaani

azathoth wrote: »

I like the thought of these typea of encounters, but I am not sure why they would benefit from a Tracker/Meter.

They wouldn't directly, but there is a definite indirect way in which they would.

With tank checks, there is essentially only one point of failure. Either your tank was successful and so the encounter was killed, or your tank wasn't successful and so your raid failed.

This also applied to encounters in which CC is key (very few raids rely on multiple people CC'ing in such encounters, it usually goes badly).

Where combat trackers come in to use though (in terms of the above four encounters) is in the healer and DPS check encounters. A good combat tracker will be able to tell you if some of the heals your healers are casting are wasted and can help lead you and your raid towards better ways of working together.

With DPS checks, a combat tracker can tell the raid who it is in the raid that may need assistance in improving their DPS. It may be that you need to get your support classes working better, or it may be that someone on the raid needs some assistance/guidance with a build or spell rotation/priority.

At the end of the day though, if you have a raid of 40, with 8 of them being healers and 30 being DPS or DPS support, if your raid isn't passing a DPS check, then you have no way of knowing where the issue is unless you have a way of tracking combat.

Noaani

I still fail to actually see the issue with combat trackers at all.

Some people seem to have some fantasy that in games without combat trackers, every one can play what ever build they want and no one they group with will care or know if they are pulling their weight or not.

That isn't true.

If anything, in games with many possible builds, people are MORE willing to give you a shot if you have an out there build and they are able to see the numbers that build can produce.

Without a tracker, if people don't "get" what they can see of your build (class, weapon, armor, skill selection) they often just won't bring you along on content. This does force people in to some cookie cutter builds.

At least with a combat tracker, people are more willing to give you and your out there build a shot. Even if they don't think it will be as good as a more standard build, they are often simply intrigued to see just how well it does - something they can't see unless they have a combat tracker.

Yes, with a combat tracker there will be kids that kick you from groups if you don't pull the numbers they think you should. But then those same players will kick you from a group before you get to the content if they don't like your build and can't track you.

Additionally, with a tracker, you can actually work on your build to be more effective. It is a fair assumption to make that with all the abilities classes will have, and all the possible augments, if a player were to specify that they wanted to be an ice mage, they would have more ice spells available to them than they are able to select at any one time. Then those that wish to do so will be able to take their unique build that they wish to run, and actually put some effort in to it to make it as effective as they can so as to continue to pull their weight in groups. Without a tracker, all they could do is select random ice spells and hope they do OK

Dygz

azathoth wrote: »

I agree, but I do not think a DPS/ACT are needed for those 100% Role Checks. If the area/mob* is for a certain level range of play, then there should be a variety of builds that could perform at that level.

So the 100% on point Tank Check would either be successful or not. You'll know with or without a tracker/meter. Because of the stipulation of being 100% on point a good player with the meta tank build could still fail, so what use is the meter?

Hopefully the 100% on point checks are more robust. Situations where the Tank/ Mage doesn't quite have to be at 100% but the Tank/Rogue would have to be and vice versa. Same with all the other augments.

Right. A Tank Check wouldn't just be about how Guardians are playing their role - it would include all the players who have Tank as a secondary archetype - and there should be a way for them to pick up the perceived slack.
Even in a party of 8, aspects of the Tank role could be handled by several people in the party - especially when the players are at max level.
A party with a Tank/Rogue who seems to be struggling might get some back-up from the Rogue/Tank and the Mage/Tank.
Or, a seemingly weak Tank/Rogue might not be as much of an issue with a party that includes a Rogue/Cleric and a Mage/Cleric. That party might not need as much tanking as a party comprised of all "pure" archetypes.

Dygz

noaani wrote: »

I still fail to actually see the issue with combat trackers at all.

Yes. And it's unlikely anyone is going to be able to change your perspective.
We will see who's more on point when we actually play Ashes.

noaani wrote: »

Some people seem to have some fantasy that in games without combat trackers, every one can play what ever build they want and no one they group with will care or know if they are pulling their weight or not.
That isn't true.

We aren't really talking about "games without trackers" - we're talking about Ashes of Creation.
Also, you are the one who is obsessed with the concept of "not pulling their weight".
You think that raiding in Ashes is going to be like raiding in other MMORPGs.

I don't think anyone has said players don't have to "pull their weight". What people have said is that there isn't just one way for a player to pull their weight - at least there shouldn't be. And if that's the case in an RPG, that's really an issue of poor game design.
Devs don't really design that way. Elitist players just think that way.

noaani wrote: »

If anything, in games with many possible builds, people are MORE willing to give you a shot if you have an out there build and they are able to see the numbers that build can produce.

It's not really even about having many possible builds - it's about having more than one viable strategy to defeat bosses. Elitist players who just want the fastest, most efficient strategy as determined by combat tracker stats don't care if there are more than one viable strategy.

noaani wrote: »

Without a tracker, if people don't "get" what they can see of your build (class, weapon, armor, skill selection) they often just won't bring you along on content. This does force people in to some cookie cutter builds.

In Ashes, there won't be the same luxury to refuse to bring people along... because the bosses won't just be sitting around cleaning their claws month after month waiting for players to repeat their attacks on the instanced boss lair.
How and why people raid and dungeon delve is going to be very different in Ashes of Creation - due to the game's unique design.

CrazySquiggle

Too lazy to sift through the entire thread for whoever mentioned it for the credit, but someone stated an idea I would be okay with as well, and that would be having a test dummy to test out your base damage on just to compare damage numbers with certain skills and get a dps readout for that. Division 2 does this and it is useful for testing all the different weapons against each other to find what works best for you.

Now before all you 5 year olds start screeching like banshees, yes I realize this would not be a perfect measurement because actual combat is way different that hitting a test dummy. There are builds in Division 2 that some people think are great because the DPS is high, but in actual use they are garbage setups.

EDIT: Forgot to mention this is just a dps example and nothing impressive in the link below

https://gamerdvr.com/gamer/crazywhiteguy99/video/76504584

Nagash

even if IS don't add them you know someone will make a add on

Dygz

Yeah, but add-ons aren't supported.

Nagash

dygz wrote: »

Yeah, but add-ons aren't supported.

when has that ever stopped modder

Dygz

When the modder gets banned.

CrazySquiggle

dygz wrote: »

When the modder gets banned.

You have obviously never met a good modder lol. The smart ones use dummy accounts and usually hide their IP so they can't be banned permanently.

Dygz

Where’s the LOL button when ya need one???

Azathoth

For me it's not that I think Ashes should not have one, just that they aren't planning on having one and that seems sufficient to me. I guess my main argument would be, if IS doesn't want one in Ashes there shouldn't be one.

I think both sides of this issue have merits and the addition of a DPS/ACT would likely not effect me at all. Except for (maybe) making bad players better because they just min/max specs based on DPS/ACT. This would likely happen anyways though.

Having a meter tell you that you could do better is different than trying, failing, and wanting to do better. Although, in many cases, I can see a player wanting to try and fail and then using a meter to determine why. I am not a power gamer, a min/max builder, or someone that feels their character needs to be the best or in a certain percent of the best, so I will likely never fully understand the use of said meters.

Noaani

dygz wrote: »

When the modder gets banned.

How can Intrepid ban someone if they don't know that person is using an add on?

It's *REALLY* easy to make it impossible for for anyone else to ever see exactly what it is you are running on your computer.

Literally the only way Intrepid would even know specific add on exists is if someone streams themselves using it - at which point all they would know is that one person is using it, and they have no way of detecting if any other player is using it.

As I've said many times in this thread, add ons don't need to interact with the game client directly. If a program is running on your computer but not interacting with the games client, literally all Intrepid can ever do is pull the name the program is running under - though even that would see them lose many thousands of subscribers - and there are ways to alter the name a program is running under at will.

I've recently seen programs that pull from another games in game text as I've outlined above as being possible. They would take a small amount of work to get working in AoC, work that couldn't begin until we have a finalized UI, but it absolutely will happen if there is no other solution.

One again though, Intrepid can't ban players for using something that Intrepid can't see.

dygz wrote: »

It's not really even about having many possible builds - it's about having more than one viable strategy to defeat bosses. Elitist players who just want the fastest, most efficient strategy as determined by combat tracker stats don't care if there are more than one viable strategy.

How well do you think a raid of 40 people just doing their own thing would compare to a raid of 40 people that are dedicated to working as a single unit towards a common goal?

Because that is what a raid is. You forgo your individual ambitions in order to further the progress of the whole. You sometimes do things that are not entirely enjoyable to you, because in doing that thing, you are furthering the progress of the hole, and you get more enjoyment out of progressing the whole than you get out of progressing the individual.

In return, you get to be a part of a group of 40 people that are also forging their own individual ambitions in order to further the whole.

It isn't about elitism at all, and those that think raiding is about elitism don't know raiding well at all.

Raiding is teamwork. Not everyone is cut out to be a part of a whole, rather than the focus of it, so not everyone is cut out to raid.

AoC will have challenging raid content. This is a given. When tackling this content, raids as a whole will decide on the best method for that specific raid. There may be other strategies, but that day, in that zone, against that encounter, on that pull, that raid is only using one - and so every member of that raid on that pull against that encounter in that zone on that day had better do what they are supposed to do otherwise they are wasting the time of the other 39 people present.

The interesting thing I've found with raiders is that they have more alts than most people would think. Not alts for raiding, as only guilds in games with overly easy combat systems ask raiders to have multiple raid ready characters - in the games I play, combat is too intricate for a player to be able to easily switch from one class to another and still be fully competent. Rather, the alts most raiders have are alts that they enjoy - it could be a race they really like, a class or build they wanted to try, a character on a different server or at a different level to play with a friend, or in some games I've played, characters locked at a specific level in order to be able to participate in nostalgic content at an appropriate level.

I bring this up to illustrate that while raiders forgo the individual ambition for the greater good, they only do that during the time in which they need to raid (and the time they need to spend becoming raid ready). Outside of raids, these players still run builds on characters just because they wanted to be an ice mage, they still play races just because they like them, they still craft because they enjoy making items - but then when it's time to raid, they set that down in order to become a small part of a greater whole.

Child Item