Glorious Alpha Two Testers!

Phase I of Alpha Two testing will occur on weekends. Each weekend is scheduled to start on Fridays at 10 AM PT and end on Sundays at 10 PM PT. Find out more here.

Check out Alpha Two Announcements here to see the latest Alpha Two news and update notes.

Our quickest Alpha Two updates are in Discord. Testers with Alpha Two access can chat in Alpha Two channels by connecting your Discord and Intrepid accounts here.

Throne and Liberty further proves Ashes needs Factions

12345679»

Comments

  • GithalGithal Member
    edited July 27
    You all will be surprised how different AOC is from lineage 2.
    But i would guess most of you will be part of zerg group anyway. So you are not concerned at all.
  • iccericcer Member
    Veeshan wrote: »
    Githal wrote: »
    Guess it's not easy to have vision of how things will work... After a2 lunches and you see what I am talking about on practice,we Will talk again
    In that comment I literally explained how mass pvp in L2 worked. A game where a party had only 3 dps characters. And the zerg's reaction was taken from personal experience from both sides: attacking a zerg and being a part of one.

    So no, I don't need to have vision of things, because I have direct experiences of a game that is literally AoC's inspiration.

    Problem with alot of these people complaining about PvP/zergs and all that are mostly coming from people who have never played a single game that is similiar to AoC or has large scale open world pvp at all.

    Exactly. That was also my point, it seems like people are taking out of their ass, arguing with people who actually HAVE played mass open-world PvP games (that are an inspiration to AoC), and know how things work.

    I wouldn't have a problem with it, if this was something new, and we just had no idea how it would turn out when we actually get to play the game. Discussion and arguments are good in that case.
    But the thing is, it's not new, it's been done in other games, we know how mass PvP works, we know how zergs work, and we know because we have actually experienced all of that, are are not talking about theoretical stuff.

    And the thing is, I haven't played L2, yet my experience is nearly the same as @Ludullu_(NiKr)'s, for example.
    Why? Because these things that we are talking about are generally true for all other similar games that have mass open-world PvP.
    When another person comes in, and starts arguing against these things, saying the opposite, it just means they haven't actually played these sort of games, and are not talking from their experience.
  • Githal wrote: »
    You all will be surprised how different AOC is from lineage 2.
    But i would guess most of you will be part of zerg group anyway. So you are not concerned at all.

    Hey, I too have gripes with L2, so in a way, let's hope we are both surprised by the changes 🥳
  • Mag7spyMag7spy Member, Alpha Two
    edited July 27
    I find it funny people are still saying zergs are unorganized. All of you need to paly throne and liberty get get some mmorpg experience since it prob has been 20 years since you have done pvp.

    It will help modernize your experience going into AoC on the current landscape.

    If im doing a large scale war with my guild i have multiple people leading large groups of people. If we are talking about 400 people most likely that content wont have them all on a single tight spot but multiple objectives + flank squads / groups.

    If you think that won't be coordinated you again do not understand the current landscape. Most zerg style groups are people that can get people together / coordinate those groups as well.

    Yall really don't get how serious people are taking these games. I have about 5 guilds in the beta but 3 were focused on pvp that is like 150 players. You better believe they were as organized as they needed to be to win fights / get bosses.

    *Edit

    And this didn't have my main people as well or the people I mainly have to organize guild things for perspective.

    6k92oqqhvgm6.png
  • Mag7spy wrote: »
    I find it funny people are still saying zergs are unorganized. All of you need to paly throne and liberty get get some mmorpg experience since it prob has been 20 years since you have done pvp.

    It will help modernize your experience going into AoC on the current landscape.

    If im doing a large scale war with my guild i have multiple people leading large groups of people. If we are talking about 400 people most likely that content wont have them all on a single tight spot but multiple objectives + flank squads / groups.

    If you think that won't be coordinated you again do not understand the current landscape. Most zerg style groups are people that can get people together / coordinate those groups as well.

    Yall really don't get how serious people are taking these games. I have about 5 guilds in the beta but 3 were focused on pvp that is like 150 players. You better believe they were as organized as they needed to be to win fights / get bosses.

    *Edit

    And this didn't have my main people as well or the people I mainly have to organize guild things for perspective.

    6k92oqqhvgm6.png

    Ah yes, Throne and Liberty, 10 years to develop the same old cashgrab Korean shovelware that even Koreans won't play cause of how bad it is.

    Congratulations on you and your own, you are the most elite dung divers the world has ever seen.
  • GithalGithal Member
    Mag7spy wrote: »
    I find it funny people are still saying zergs are unorganized. All of you need to paly throne and liberty get get some mmorpg experience since it prob has been 20 years since you have done pvp.

    It will help modernize your experience going into AoC on the current landscape.

    If im doing a large scale war with my guild i have multiple people leading large groups of people. If we are talking about 400 people most likely that content wont have them all on a single tight spot but multiple objectives + flank squads / groups.

    If you think that won't be coordinated you again do not understand the current landscape. Most zerg style groups are people that can get people together / coordinate those groups as well.

    Yall really don't get how serious people are taking these games. I have about 5 guilds in the beta but 3 were focused on pvp that is like 150 players. You better believe they were as organized as they needed to be to win fights / get bosses.

    *Edit

    And this didn't have my main people as well or the people I mainly have to organize guild things for perspective.

    6k92oqqhvgm6.png

    Ah yes, Throne and Liberty, 10 years to develop the same old cashgrab Korean shovelware that even Koreans won't play cause of how bad it is.

    Congratulations on you and your own, you are the most elite dung divers the world has ever seen.

    What he is talking about is not connected to Throne and liberty at all. Its the way zergs function. And this will apply to any game.
  • LudulluLudullu Member, Alpha Two
    Mag7spy wrote: »
    Most zerg style groups are people that can get people together / coordinate those groups as well.
    And as I keep saying, if they ARE that coordinated - they deserve what they get. I don't want well-coordinated big groups to suddenly lose simply because the game has op aoes.

    And judging by those score numbers, there can be at least 3 sides to that server with roughly similar score values between the sides, and I'm sure that this is far from all the guilds on the server.

    So it comes down to people's willingness to fight against the zerg and their skill compared to the zerg's.

    And as a ton of people have been saying for years now - people are pussies now and never want to rebel (ironic, considering your guild's name :D ), so yes, zergs will dominate. But it won't be because of aoes or game design. It will be because players are shitty weaklings now.
    Githal wrote: »
    But i would guess most of you will be part of zerg group anyway. So you are not concerned at all.
    Yes, my small node guild will definitely be a huge zerg B)
  • AszkalonAszkalon Member, Alpha Two
    Yes, my small node guild will definitely be a huge zerg B)

    I think what he means is - > we will seek Allies beyond our normal Guild-Size and be part of something greater.



    Which is by no means a wrong Decision, right ? Riiight ? No one will take down a Node of Level Three, Four - or above, only with a single Guild with like 20 Members, right ?


    That would be absurd. Or only a Node which is likely Level Three and where all Citizens completely suck as Defenders. lol
    a50whcz343yn.png
    ✓ Occasional Roleplayer
    ✓ Guild is " Balderag's Garde " for now. (German)
  • LudulluLudullu Member, Alpha Two
    Aszkalon wrote: »
    I think what he means is - > we will seek Allies beyond our normal Guild-Size and be part of something greater.
    Nah, I do think he means that we'll be in zerg guilds. But even if he does mean what you're saying - no, I will not be a part of a zerg, because I'll always be opposing one.
  • AszkalonAszkalon Member, Alpha Two
    I will not be a part of a zerg, because I'll always be opposing one.

    So You will gain the [Outnumbered, but not outgunned]-Achievement. :grin:
    a50whcz343yn.png
    ✓ Occasional Roleplayer
    ✓ Guild is " Balderag's Garde " for now. (German)
  • Balrog21Balrog21 Member, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    World is way to big to have one guild run the server.
  • AszkalonAszkalon Member, Alpha Two
    Balrog21 wrote: »
    World is way to big to have one guild run the server.

    Exactly.

    The " One gigantic Zerg Alliance will dominate everything without Resistance " is a Fear by many here, i have the Impression sometimes.


    But i must say it is also kinda a little bit a pessimistic Approach. Who can honestly claim on a Nine-Thousand-People Server that they will always be an invincible Zerg Alliance or something like that ?


    This is only possible when all other Forces never band together against oneself. :grin:
    Seeing as People will definitely play in way more different Node-Places than just Five to Nine Nodes, out of like the full Eighty-Five or so on the whole Worldmap,

    how is someone even supposed to gather like half the whole Server ? This shooooouuuld be impossible.


    Lastly,
    i imagine such a Server getting lonely really quick, when all other Players who are not in the Mood for this, are tired of being dominated by lets say - > +2000 to +4000 People (<- maximum) who think they must PvP everyone who could possibly be outside their own Alliance.


    Not even with Streamers like dear Asmongold i could imagine such sick Groups to form. And i know MANY People always love to follow him. :D
    a50whcz343yn.png
    ✓ Occasional Roleplayer
    ✓ Guild is " Balderag's Garde " for now. (German)
  • Ayeveegaming1Ayeveegaming1 Member, Braver of Worlds, Kickstarter, Alpha One, Alpha Two, Early Alpha Two
    edited July 27
    I would hope that if the guilds are out there zerging, that there would be other guilds attacking the base of the zerg guild, weaking the base of said zerg. There can be so many tangents to go from this. I suggest peopel read The Art of War by Sun Tzu. https://youtu.be/jxcMRkqaQdw?si=DuE1qz9sjo0AqOHT
    vmw4o7x2etm1.png
  • Mag7spyMag7spy Member, Alpha Two
    Mag7spy wrote: »
    Most zerg style groups are people that can get people together / coordinate those groups as well.
    And as I keep saying, if they ARE that coordinated - they deserve what they get. I don't want well-coordinated big groups to suddenly lose simply because the game has op aoes.

    And judging by those score numbers, there can be at least 3 sides to that server with roughly similar score values between the sides, and I'm sure that this is far from all the guilds on the server.

    So it comes down to people's willingness to fight against the zerg and their skill compared to the zerg's.

    And as a ton of people have been saying for years now - people are pussies now and never want to rebel (ironic, considering your guild's name :D ), so yes, zergs will dominate. But it won't be because of aoes or game design. It will be because players are shitty weaklings now.
    Githal wrote: »
    But i would guess most of you will be part of zerg group anyway. So you are not concerned at all.
    Yes, my small node guild will definitely be a huge zerg B)

    Mainly wasn't really talking about what they should and shouldnt get, though i agree people that are more coordinated and win should get what they aim for.

    I really want to dispel this zergs or large numbers of players are not organized thing, cause that isnt really reality.
  • Mag7spyMag7spy Member, Alpha Two
    Mag7spy wrote: »
    I find it funny people are still saying zergs are unorganized. All of you need to paly throne and liberty get get some mmorpg experience since it prob has been 20 years since you have done pvp.

    It will help modernize your experience going into AoC on the current landscape.

    If im doing a large scale war with my guild i have multiple people leading large groups of people. If we are talking about 400 people most likely that content wont have them all on a single tight spot but multiple objectives + flank squads / groups.

    If you think that won't be coordinated you again do not understand the current landscape. Most zerg style groups are people that can get people together / coordinate those groups as well.

    Yall really don't get how serious people are taking these games. I have about 5 guilds in the beta but 3 were focused on pvp that is like 150 players. You better believe they were as organized as they needed to be to win fights / get bosses.

    *Edit

    And this didn't have my main people as well or the people I mainly have to organize guild things for perspective.

    6k92oqqhvgm6.png

    Ah yes, Throne and Liberty, 10 years to develop the same old cashgrab Korean shovelware that even Koreans won't play cause of how bad it is.

    Congratulations on you and your own, you are the most elite dung divers the world has ever seen.

    ITs always the casual players that don't understand and are the same people complaining when they die in pvp.
  • DepravedDepraved Member, Alpha Two
    Mag7spy wrote: »
    @Depraved you play the beta?

    i just logged in to test the new skills. only made a level 20 char that's it ;3

    didn't feel like doing everything all over again to lose it in a few days xD
  • DepravedDepraved Member, Alpha Two
    deathwish wrote: »
    Probably the most important feedback I will bring over to AoC.

    If you're not apart of the mega super multi guild that controls the server you are not allowed to play the game. Meaning you either get the benefits of being the #1 guild on the server and snowball or you become content to be farmed by the #1 guild and quit the game to do something more fun.

    New World had this, Throne and Liberty has this and Arche Age 2 will have this. These games have all failed or are going to fail.

    Add factions to Ashes to prevent this problem. Two factions is great. Three would be the best design.

    Small scale GvG has little to no accessibility which means less players playing in the game and spending money. Good luck.

    games with factions are even worse when you try to avoid the problem you described. in a non faction game, people can easily oppose the winning side. cant do that in a faction game unless you reroll, since you are stuck (only nw made it kind of easy, that's it)

    one side can still dominate and farm everyone else in a faction game, then people just start rerolling and joining that side...its even worse than no factions xD
  • SmaashleySmaashley Member, Alpha Two
    Throne and Liberty doesn't prove anything. It's gonna be a dead P2W game in 6 months. Let Intrepid rock the MMORPG genre.
  • AszkalonAszkalon Member, Alpha Two
    Smaashley wrote: »
    Throne and Liberty doesn't prove anything. It's gonna be a dead P2W game in 6 months. Let Intrepid rock the MMORPG genre.

    I don't know anything about Throne and Liberty - > but i agree with You instantly ! Let Intrepid ROCK the MMORPG Genre. It is about time someone worthy lifts the Hammer that are MMO's and lead the Genre to Greatness.
    a50whcz343yn.png
    ✓ Occasional Roleplayer
    ✓ Guild is " Balderag's Garde " for now. (German)
  • Mag7spyMag7spy Member, Alpha Two
    Smaashley wrote: »
    Throne and Liberty doesn't prove anything. It's gonna be a dead P2W game in 6 months. Let Intrepid rock the MMORPG genre.

    I feel that wont be the case based on how people were playing the game and excited for it, ontop of the changes and new content coming.
  • VegaronVegaron Member
    edited July 28
    It might even outlive AoC :D You wouldnt believe how Players are not willing to let go of a dead p2w Korea mmo because of addiction and sunken cost fallacy. And how much Whales are willing to spend for decades.
  • DepravedDepraved Member, Alpha Two
    Vegaron wrote: »
    It might even outlive AoC :D You wouldnt believe how Players are not willing to let go of a dead p2w Korea mmo because of addiction and sunken cost fallacy. And how much Whales are willing to spend for decades.

    tnl isn't p2w enough, according to asian players, and that's why they don't like it xD
    west and east are different when it comes to p2w
  • NoaaniNoaani Member, Intrepid Pack, Alpha Two
    ,
    Depraved wrote: »
    Vegaron wrote: »
    It might even outlive AoC :D You wouldnt believe how Players are not willing to let go of a dead p2w Korea mmo because of addiction and sunken cost fallacy. And how much Whales are willing to spend for decades.

    tnl isn't p2w enough, according to asian players, and that's why they don't like it xD
    west and east are different when it comes to p2w

    I wouldn't personally consier this an East/West thing, so much as a specifically South Korean thing vs the rest of the world.

    Most SEA players dispise pay to win as much as most NA players do. Same with most Japanese players.

    That said, I get that in the MMORPG world we kind of talk about East/West with the understanding that east is specifically just South Korea.
Sign In or Register to comment.