Azraya wrote: » Hello my dudes and not dudes and everything in between. I thought it would be interesting to see what everyone thinks the secondary class will do to your primary. Do you guys have any thoughts on how it could or should work? Any particular kind of ability augments you think a certain class should get?
Azherae wrote: » Rogue - https://forums.ashesofcreation.com/discussion/50146/rogue-desire-compilation-and-analysis-conversion#latest Ranger - https://forums.ashesofcreation.com/discussion/50801/ranger-desires-compilation-and-analysis-conversion#latest Mage - https://forums.ashesofcreation.com/discussion/50889/mage-desires-compilation-and-analysis-conversion#latest Tank - https://forums.ashesofcreation.com/discussion/50932/tank-desires-compilation-and-analysis-conversion#latest Fighter - https://forums.ashesofcreation.com/discussion/50187/fighter-desires-compilation-and-analysis-conversion#latest Bard - https://forums.ashesofcreation.com/discussion/50357/bard-desires-compilation-and-analysis-conversion#latest Cleric - https://forums.ashesofcreation.com/discussion/50562/cleric-desires-compilation-and-analysis-conversion#latest Summoner - https://forums.ashesofcreation.com/discussion/50101/summoner-desire-compilation-and-analysis-conversion#latest
Roxi wrote: » I prefer to play with the "tank" class, so I'd like to break down its secondary classes: 1. + Bard = Argent. (one of the most difficult tank combos for me to imagine), but I will try to assume that now tank skills will weaken the enemy, or increase survivability and resistance against enemy control. movement speed can be increased. 2. + Cleric = Paladin. (without thinking for a long time) I can assume that his attacks should heal allies, perhaps the effect of "immortality" - the automatic resurrection of the tank after death. 3. + Fighter = Knight. when taking this class, there should be an increase in physical attack and defense. 4. + Mage = Spellshield. improved resistance against magic for yourself and for the group. 5. + Ranger = Warden. increase the range of provocation skills. Improved durability against ranged weapons. 6. + Rogue = Nightshield. detection of invisible objects and improved protection against bleeding/poisons. 7. + Summoner = Keeper. the ability to suppress the actions of summoned beings. 8. + Tank = Guardian. average class among all tanks. summing up, I want to say that I think that all classes of the first profession "tank" will be the antipodes of those classes, which second profession they will take.
SirChancelot wrote: » Azraya wrote: » Hello my dudes and not dudes and everything in between. I thought it would be interesting to see what everyone thinks the secondary class will do to your primary. Do you guys have any thoughts on how it could or should work? Any particular kind of ability augments you think a certain class should get? Ohh I love stirring up this question I hope that secondary archetypes if built properly can shift the role of the players character
CROW3 wrote: » *Points to 'Tank'@SirChancelot - I know what you're thinking. Don't do it.
CROW3 wrote: » Ohhhh, he knows.
SirChancelot wrote: » CROW3 wrote: » *Points to 'Tank'@SirChancelot - I know what you're thinking. Don't do it. Come oonnn 😆 I don't think it should work for everything, but I'd love to see a few combinations here and there that if fully spec'ed into being that role it could create a tank or healer. That's why I'm so eagerly looking forward to A2 and beta. I'm hoping they will have some functions for testing giving us easy respec of skill points and secondaries to allow for experimentation. I absolutely love finding the weird shit that shouldn't work.
CROW3 wrote: » Oh, well - that's fine. I was sure - sure - you were going to rehash one of the topics-that-shall-not-be-named.
SirChancelot wrote: » CROW3 wrote: » Oh, well - that's fine. I was sure - sure - you were going to rehash one of the topics-that-shall-not-be-named. Nope 😆 I'm not going to try that again until I actually get to see more and play around with it some, if @Azraya wants to read through the old one though, by all means
Azraya wrote: » SirChancelot wrote: » CROW3 wrote: » Oh, well - that's fine. I was sure - sure - you were going to rehash one of the topics-that-shall-not-be-named. Nope 😆 I'm not going to try that again until I actually get to see more and play around with it some, if @Azraya wants to read through the old one though, by all means i'm reading it now.
